FP2020 1.0
APHRC-FP2020-1.0
African Population and Health Research Center
2018-03-09
Nesstar Publisher
Version 1.0 (March 2018)
Resources Flow Pilot Project in Tanzania and Ethiopia 2012
Pilot Study
FP2020
APHRC-FP2020-1.0
African Population and Health Research Center
Futures Institute
Health Policy Project
Chimaraoke Izugbara
Erik Beekink
Michael Mutua
Copyright © APHRC, 2018
Nesstar Publisher
Netherlands Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute
Administrative Records, Health (ad/hea]
For many years, international donors, multilateral corporations, governments and philanthropies have invested heavily in supporting family planning programs in sub-Saharan Africa. Regardless the resources applied to FP, the gap of the needs met is still huge. In response to the need for a revamped family planning agenda, several initiatives have been developed, among them, the Family Planning 2020 (FP2020) Initiative. FP2020 is a global partnership that supports the rights of couples, women and girls to decide, freely, and for themselves, whether, when, and how many children they want to have. The initiative works with governments, civil society, multi-lateral organizations, donors, the private sector, and the research and development community to enable 120 million more women and girls to use contraceptives by 2020. Given the paucity of information on this expenditure, this pilot study was implemented in Tanzania and Ethiopia. The aim was to ascertain the feasibility of generating quality data on expenditure on family planning from the public and private sectors involved in providing family planning goods and services in the two countries.
Version 1.0 with datasets and study DOI
Capital Investment
Domestic sources
Expenditures
International sources
Own income
Recurrent expenses
ETHIOPIA
TANZANIA
This survey covered sampled actors in family planning in Ethiopia and Tanzania.
Government departments , corporations, NGOs, Public institutions, insurance companies, local philanthropies and consultants that deal with family planning issues.
The survey covered sampled government departments , corporations, NGOs, Public institutions, insurance companies, local philanthropies and consultants that deal with family planning issues.
The first step in implementing the survey was to prelist all known key players in FP financing and provision. From that list was extracted all government, insurance companies, and large corporations to be included. For parsimony, the top 10 NGOs and a simple random sample of the remaining NGOs were included in the sample. The top 10 NGOs and other major players were identified based on the consultant's knowledge of the specific organization's approximate market share of FP involvement in their respective countries and consultative discussion with national FP service provision experts.
Face-to-face [f2f]
Other non-data entry errors that could not be verified against the paper questionnaires could be corrected after seeking corrections from the consultant or the respondent. The final clean data were used to produce summary measures such as proportions, summations and averages.
Director of Research
African Population and Health Research Center, Resources Flow Pilot Project in Tanzania and Ethiopia, 2018. Nairobi - Kenya. doi:10.20369/aphrc-050:2018.1.0
The user should submit electronic and paper copies of all publications generated using APHRC data to the Policy Engagement and Communications Department, with copies to the Director of Research.
The user of the data acknowledges that APHRC and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Corporation_Tanzania.NSDstat
6
228
Nesstar 200801
African Population and Health Research Center
na
1.0 version
na
NGO_Tanzania.NSDstat
10
239
Nesstar 200801
African Population and Health Research Center
na
1.0 version
na
Government_Tanzania.NSDstat
4
198
Nesstar 200801
African Population and Health Research Center
na
1.0 version
na
NGO_Ethiopia.NSDstat
8
239
Nesstar 200801
African Population and Health Research Center
na
1.0 version
na
Survey on Financial Flows for Family Planning in 2012 NGOs
Survey on Financial Flows for Family Planning in 2012 Government Departments
Survey on Financial Flows for Family Planning in 2012 Corporations
A. General Information 2012
B. Overview of Financial Flows 2012
C. Income Received in 2012 from Domestic and International Sources
A. Recurrent expenses
Capital investments
A. General Information 2012
B. Overview of Financial Flows 2012 for Family Planning
Income received from domestic sources for 2012
Income received from international sources for 2012
Expenditures for Family Planning in 2012
A. Recurrent Expenditures
B. Capital Investment
A. General Information 2012
B. Overview of Financial Flows 2012
Revenues for your organiztion
Expenditures of your organization
C. Income Received in 2012 from Domestic and International sources
A. Recurrent expenses
B. Capital investments
Id of responding organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
na
NA
All responding government departments
6
0
Unique ID assigned to the responding organization
1
1
2
1
3
4
Organization code
Respondent
na
na
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
0
A code that identifies a particular responding organizaton
1
1
2
1
3
4
A1: city
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
City
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
0
City where the responding organzation is located
Dae-es-salaam
4
Dar-es-salaam
2
A1: province
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
State/Region/ Province
na
NA
All responding corporations
0
0
The province/region where the organization is located
A1: country
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Country
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
0
Country in which the organization is located
Tanzania
6
A1: position and unit of respondent
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Position and unit
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
0
Position held and unit under which the person responding on behalf of the organization works
COP
1
Country Director Advance Family Planning
4
Senior family planning specialist
1
A2: calendar year
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate whether you use 'calendar year' or 'financial year' in this questionnaire:
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
0
Captures whether financial records are such that the time period covered is within a calendar year or a financial year
0
5
1
1
A2: start of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate whether you use 'calendar year' or 'financial year' in this questionnaire:
na
NA
All responding corporations
5
2011-10-01
2012-11-01
Captures whether financial records are such that the time period covered is within a calendar year or a financial year
2011-10-01
1
2012-01-11
2
2012-10-01
1
2012-11-01
1
A2: end of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate whether you use 'calendar year' or 'financial year' in this questionnaire: (to)
na
NA
All responding corporations
6
2012-09-30
2013-10-31
Indicates the end of calendar or financial yar for which financial records are kept.
2012-09-30
1
2013-09-30
1
2013-10-31
4
A3: currency used
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Currency used throughout the questionnaire:
na
All responding corporations
6
0
The currency used in filling the questionnaire
1
Tsh
0
2
USD
6
A4: currency rate used
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
All responding corporations
6
0
The exchange rate of the currency used vis a vis the US dollar
1
6
B1: income from domestic sources
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Any income received from domestic sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding corporations
6
0
Income received from sources within the country
0
6
B2: income from international sources
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Any income received from international sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding corporations
6
0
372000
25700000
4748000
10271051.67
Income received from sources that are not based within the country
B3: total domestic ependitureS
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
You are requested to summarise the total amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed domestically by your organisation for family planning activities in 2012. Only include expenditures made both locally and abroad which benefited local family planning projects/programs or activities.
All responding corporations
6
0
349000
24079240
4462540
9617706.831
Expenditures incurred on domestic activities
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
Indicates the name of the funder
Bill &Melinda Gates
4
USAID
1
direct funding to MOH
1
C1: country 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
6
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
0
C1: type 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
Type of funding organization
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
2
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
4
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
C1: level 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
124000
2850000
774333.333
1120397.37
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
0
Indicates the name of the funder
Hewlett Foundation
4
local NGOs
1
C1: country 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
1
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
5
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: type 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
1
Type of funding organization
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
1
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
4
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: level 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
0
6386000
1147000
2567054.577
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
0
Indicates the name of the funder
Packard Foundation
4
international NGOs
1
C1: country 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
1
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
5
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: type 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
5
1
Type of funding organization
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
4
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: level 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
0
11750983
2041163.833
4757079.076
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
washington agreements
1
C1: country 4
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
5
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
1
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
0
Sysmiss
5
C1: type 4
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
5
Type of funding organization
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
1
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
5
C1: level 4
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 4
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
0
3112257
518709.5
1270573.6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 5
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 5
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 5
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 5
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 7
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 7
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 7
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 7
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 8
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 8
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 8
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 8
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 9
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 9
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 9
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 9
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 10
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 10
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 10
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 10
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 11
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 11
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 11
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 11
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 12
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 12
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 12
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 12
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 13
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 13
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 13
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 13
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 14
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 14
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 14
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 14
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 15
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 15
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 15
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 15
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 16
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 16
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 16
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 16
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 17
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 17
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 17
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 17
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 18
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 18
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 18
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 18
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 19
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 19
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 19
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 19
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 20
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 20
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Type of funding organization
C1: level 20
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
C1: amount received 20
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
0
6
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
6
C1: total income
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Total:
na
na
All organization funded by other organizations
6
0
372000
24079240
4477873.333
9609841.179
The total income received from various sources.
D1: name of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Name of project/programme:
na
na
All responding corporations.
2
0
The title of the project
Advance Family Panning
1
jiamini green star
1
D2: project/program reference number
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Reference number of project/ programme
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
6
The reference number of th project/programme within the organization
Sysmiss
6
D3: project/program period from
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
na
All responding corporations.
3
2011-10-01
2012-01-11
When the project started/starts
2011-10-01
2
2012-01-11
1
D3: project/program period to
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
na
All responding corporations.
2
2014-12-31
2017-10-31
End date
2014-12-31
1
2017-10-31
1
D4: project location
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Project location
na
na
All responding corporations.
2
0
Where the project is being carried out
kinondoni, kisarawe, chato,ngara,biharando
1
national
1
D5: is prog/project for general development
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
General development project/programme with a family planning component
na
na
All responding corporations.
6
0
Project with family planning as a component only
0
6
D5: is prog/project exclusively for family planning
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Project/programme exclusively dedicated to family planning
na
na
All responding corporations.
6
0
Projects that are exclusively for family planning
0
4
1
2
D6: income received from other organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organizations/departments specificallyfor this project/programme in 2012
na
na
All responding corporations.
6
0
Income from other organizations specifically received for this project
0
6
D6: type of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
0
Was the organization domestic or international
D6: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount received from the said organization
Sysmiss
6
D6: type of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
0
Was the organization domestic or international
D6: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount received from the said organization
Sysmiss
6
D6: type of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
0
Was the organization domestic or international
D6: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount received from the said organization
Sysmiss
6
D7: total amount spent on family planning
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
You are requested to fill in the amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed by your organisation for this family planning project/programme. In case of an integrated or general development project/programme, please make an estimation of the amount spent on the family planning component only.
All responding corporations.
6
0
0
1300000
216666.667
530722.778
Total expenitures incurred both recurrent and capital investments
D7: recurrent epenses
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (A. Recurrent expenses)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
You are requested to fill in the amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed by your organisation for this family planning project/programme. In case of an integrated or general development project/programme, please make an estimation of the amount spent on the family planning component only.
All responding corporations.
6
0
0
1300000
216666.667
530722.778
Amount spent to operationalise the project
D7: capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (B. Capital investment)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
You are requested to fill in the amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed by your organisation for this family planning project/programme. In case of an integrated or general development project/programme, please make an estimation of the amount spent on the family planning component only.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Amount spent directly on the project
0
6
D8.1: internal service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on internal staff costs
Sysmiss
6
D8.1: percentage of internak service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on internal staff costs out of total recurrent expenses
0
6
D8.1.1: out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
6
D8.1.1: percentage of out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically out-patient services
0
6
D8.1.2: inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
6
D8.1.2: percentage of inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on in-patient services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
0
6
D8.2: amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on outsourced services
Sysmiss
6
D8.2: percentage of amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
0
6
D8.2.1: amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on out-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
6
D8.2.1: percentage of amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on out-patient services))
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on out-patient services out of total amount spent on outsourcing of services
0
6
D8.2.2: amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
6
D8.2.2: percentage of amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-percentage on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on outsourcing of services
0
6
D8.3: amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
Sysmiss
6
D8.3: percentage of amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
0
6
D8.3: percentage on condoms
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on condoms)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on condoms
0
6
D8.3: percentage on pills
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on pills)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on pills
0
6
D8.3: percentage on emergency contraceptives
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on emergency contaceptives)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on emergency contraceptives
0
6
D8.3: percentage on diaphragm
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on diaphragms)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on diaphragm
0
6
D8.3: percentage on injectables
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on injectables)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on injectables
0
6
D8.3: percentage on implants
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on implants)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on implants
0
6
D8.3: percentage on IUDs
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on IUDs)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on IUDs
0
6
D8.3: percentage on standard days method
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on standard days method)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on standard days method
0
6
D8.3: percentage on medicine
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on medicine)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on medicine
0
6
D8.3: percentage on other consumables
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on other consumables)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on other consumables
0
6
D8.4: amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Information, Education and Communication
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all family planning related disbursements made in 2012 for IEC, including advertising campaigns, media or any other ways of communicating FP messages. IEC is considered to be a collective service aimed at the whole or groups of population (say, all health care workers within a facility or a whole community) with the aim to improve overall health standards of the effectiveness and efficiency of the health system, which benefits all users simultaneously (System of Health Accounts, 2011).
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount spent on Information, Education and Communication
856000
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.4: percentage of amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Information, Education and Communication)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all family planning related disbursements made in 2012 for IEC, including advertising campaigns, media or any other ways of communicating FP messages. IEC is considered to be a collective service aimed at the whole or groups of population (say, all health care workers within a facility or a whole community) with the aim to improve overall health standards of the effectiveness and efficiency of the health system, which benefits all users simultaneously (System of Health Accounts, 2011).
All responding corporations.
6
0
0
66
11
26.944
Percentage of amount spent on IEC
D8.5: amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Policy Development and Advocacy)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount spent on policy development and advocacy
232985
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.5: percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Policy Development and Advocacy)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
0
6
D8.6: amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on MIS & HIS
Sysmiss
6
D8.6: percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
0
6
D8.7: amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
32000
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.7: percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
All responding corporations.
6
0
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
0
5
3
1
D8.8: amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Capacity building/ training)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount spent on capacity building/training
96000
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.8: percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Capacity building/ training
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
0
5
7
1
D8.9: amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Program Management Staff costs)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
All responding corporations.
1
5
Percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
316000
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.9: percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
All responding corporations.
6
0
0
24
4
9.798
Percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
D8.10: amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on opreational expenditures)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount spent on operational expenses
139015
1
Sysmiss
5
D8.10: percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
0
6
D8.11: other services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Recurrent expenditure on other services
D8.11: amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
All responding corporations.
0
6
Recurrent expenditure on other services
Sysmiss
6
D8.11: percentage of amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on other services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Amount spent on other services
0
6
total recurrent expenditure
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(Recurrent total)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
2
4
372000
1300000
836000
656195.093
Summation of all recurrrent expenditures categories
D8.12: amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
6
D8.12: percentage of amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
6
D8.13: amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.13: percentage of amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.1: amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on equipment)
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.1: percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on car purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.2: amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(computer and ICT purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.2: percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on computer and ICT purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.3: amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on computer and ICT purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.3: percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(office furniture)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(office furniture)
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.4: medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
D8.13.4: amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.4: percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on medical equipment
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.5: amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.13.5: percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
6
D8.14: other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Specifying other equipment
D8.14: amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(othe
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
6
D8.14: percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other capital investment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
6
total capital investments
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (total capital investments)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Summation of all categories of capital investments
Sysmiss
6
total sum of recurrent and capital expenses
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (A+B)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Summation of recurrent expenses and capital investments
Sysmiss
6
D9: expenditures directly from organization to a project
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditures directly from organization to a project
0
6
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Name of organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount to organization(s)
Sysmiss
6
D9: expenditures directly to a government institution
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditure directlty to another national NGO
0
6
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Name of organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount to organization(s)
Sysmiss
6
D9: expenditure directlty to another national NGO
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditure directlty to another national NGO
0
1
1
5
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
5
0
Name of organization
Advocacy Network Against AIDS,
1
Human Development Trust
1
Journalist Association of Tz
1
Tanzania Red Cross Society
1
UMATI
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
4
2
16683
105000
39497
43674.295
Amount to organization(s)
D9: expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditure directlty to hospitals/ ambulances/pharmacies
0
6
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Name of organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount to organization(s)
Sysmiss
6
D9: expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
0
6
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Name of organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
6
Amount to organization(s)
Sysmiss
6
D9: expenditure directly to other organizations
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
6
0
Expenditure directly to other organizations
0
5
1
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
0
0
Name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding corporations.
1
5
Amount to organization(s)
1300000
1
Sysmiss
5
D10: percentage of adolescents
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of adolescents (10-19) targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of youth
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of youth targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of women
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
1
5
Proportion by percentage of women targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
50
1
Sysmiss
5
D10: percentage of men
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
1
5
Proportion by percentage of men targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
50
1
Sysmiss
5
D10: percentage of HIV positive individuals
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of HIV positive individuals targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of migrants
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of migrants targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of sex workers
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of sex workers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of healthcare workers
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of healthcare workers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of employees
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of employees targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of rural population
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of employees targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of researchers
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
0
6
Proportion by percentage of researchers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
6
D10: other poulation
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
4
0
Proportion by percentage of other poulation (not in hierachy above) targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Policy makers
1
policy makers
3
D10: percentage of other population
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.]]>
All responding corporations.
3
3
100
3
Sysmiss
3
D11: specific age from
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
All responding corporations.
5
1
Start of age range of target population
18
1
35
4
Sysmiss
1
D11: specific age to
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
All responding corporations.
5
1
End of age range of target population
49
1
65
4
Sysmiss
1
D12: objectives of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the corporation.
na
Objectives of the project/programme
na
na
All responding corporations.
5
0
Objectives of project/program
advocate for adequate funding and improved environment for FP in Tanzania
1
advocate for funding and improved policy enviroment in Tz
3
demand creaton for services and generic products
1
Id of responding organization
All responding organizations
10
0
A unique ID of responding organization
1
1
4
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
1
10
1
11
1
12
1
13
1
Organization code
na
All responding organizations
10
0
A code assigned specifially to a particular organization
1
1
4
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
1
10
1
11
1
12
1
13
1
A1: city
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
City
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
City where the organzation is located
Dar-Es-Salaam
1
Dar-es- Salaam
1
Dar-es-Salaaam
1
Dar-es-Salaam
3
Dar-es-salaam
4
A1: province
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
The province where the organization is located
NA
All responding organizations
0
0
The province where the organization is located
A1: country
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Country
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
The country where the organization is located
Tanzania
10
A1: position and unit of respondent
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Position and unit
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
The position held by the respondent and the unit underwhich he/she works
Executive Director
2
FP cordinator
1
Finance Officer
1
Policy Advisor(health)
1
Program Manager- Advocacy
1
Program Officer
1
Program cordinator
1
Project Cordinator-FP
1
Senior Technical Manager
1
A2: calendar year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
The financial records are such that the time period covered are within a calendar year or a financial year
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
The financial records are such that the time period covered are within a calendar year or a financial year
0
5
1
5
A2: start of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
From
NA
All responding organizations
8
2008-09-01
2012-01-10
Indicates end of the calendar year or financial year
2008-09-01
1
2011-01-01
1
2011-01-10
1
2011-07-01
1
2011-09-01
1
2012-01-01
2
2012-01-10
1
A2: End of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
To
All responding organizations
8
2012-06-30
2013-09-30
Indicates end of the calendar year or financial year
2012-06-30
1
2012-08-31
1
2012-09-30
3
2012-12-31
2
2013-09-30
1
A3: currency used
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Currency used throughout the questionnaire:
All responding organizations
10
0
The currency used in filling the questionnaire
1
Tsh
7
2
USD
3
A4: currency rate used
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
If applicable, please specify the currency rate you have used
na
All responding organizations
10
0
The exchange rate of the currency used vis a vis the US dollar
1600
10
A5: administrative level of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
At what administrative level is your organisation working
na
All responding organizations
10
0
At what administrative level is the organisation working
0
No
1
1
Yes
9
A6: type of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Please indicate the type of your non-governmental organisation
na
All responding organizations
10
0
Type of organization
0
No
8
1
Yes
2
A6a: type NGO
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
National NGO
na
All responding organizations
10
0
Specifically identifies the type of NGO from the hierachy provided
1
National NGO
4
2
Research institute
1
3
University
0
4
Umbrella organisation
1
6
Other
4
A6e: other Specify
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Other (specify)
na
All responding organizations
4
0
To specify type of NGO if not in the hierachy provided
International NGO
4
B1: income from domestic sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning
Amount
Any income received from domestic sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
262860072
26286007.2
83123653.344
Income received from sources within the country
B2: income from international sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning
Amount
Any income received from international sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
415282087
95333015.2
154027879.096
Income received from sources that are not based within the country
B3: income from own sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income in 2012 for family planning, generated from own sources (e.g. members' contributions, user fees, interest earned on endowments, or forms of cost recovery)
Any income generated from own sources e.g. contributions, user fees, profits, interest earned on endowments, or forms of cost recovery.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
50544733
6014473.3
15934557.635
Income generated by the organization from its own sources
B4: total income
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Total income for family planning in 2012:
Sum up the amounts provided in B1, B2 and B3.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
553399059
127633495.7
208354667.18
The summation of all sources of income
B5: total domestic expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Total domestic expenditures for family planning projects/programmes in 2012:
All responding organizations
10
0
0
376861960
126493931.2
164067100.226
Expenditures incurred on domestic activities
B6: total international expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Total international expenditures for family planning projects/programmes in 2012:
Amount
You are requested to summarise the total amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed internationally by your organisation for family planning activities in 2012 and which did not directly benefit local FP activities. Note: a specification of international expenditures is NOT required in section D. Section D should only include domestic expenditures
All responding organizations
10
0
0
284592958
37301310.1
88854051.23
Expenditures incurred on international activities
B7: total expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Total expenditures for family planning
Amount
Sum up the amounts provided in B5 and B6
All responding organizations
10
0
0
537215499
163795241.3
217740183.677
Summation of all expenditures incurred
B8: difference between incomes and expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
please tick box
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 7 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (i.e. income) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in a different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
All responding organizations
10
0
Difference between income and expenitures
0
8
1
2
B8: reason for difference
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Specify reason
NA
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 7 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (i.e. income) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in a different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
Organizations with considerable difference in expenditure and income
2
Reason for the difference between income and expenditure
Implementation of activities depend on multiple partners with different priorities slowing down implementation pace
1
the difeerence is 3%
1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
7
0
Indicates the name of the funder
Advanc Family Planning
1
Advance Family Planning
1
Bill and melinda gates foundation
1
CDC
1
USAID
3
C1: country 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
7
3
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
7
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
0
Sysmiss
3
C1: type 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
6
4
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
2
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
3
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
4
C1: level 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
b
1
C1: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
10
0
0
415282087
73035629.8
146725573.617
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
Engender Health
1
C1: country 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
1
9
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
0
2
UK
0
3
Tanzania
1
Sysmiss
9
C1: type 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
9
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
9
C1: level 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
b
1
C1: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
10
0
0
245839672
24583967.2
77741330.275
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
IPPF
1
C1: country 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
1
9
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
0
2
UK
1
3
Tanzania
0
Sysmiss
9
C1: type 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
9
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
9
C1: level 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
10
0
0
239994254
23999425.4
75892846.799
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Indicates the name of the funder
C1: country 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Resident country of the funding organization
C1: type 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: level 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
0
0
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
C1: amount received 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
0
10
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Sysmiss
10
C1: total income
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
NA
All organization funded by other organizations
9
1
0
502854326
135132246.667
204732702.816
D1: name of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Name of project/programme:
na
All responding organizations
7
0
The title of the project
Advance Family Planning
3
Innovation in Reproductive Health
1
Maisha
1
Progress
1
xx
1
D2: project/program reference number
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Reference number of project/ programme
NA
na
All responding organizations
3
7
10
3239
1416
1654.396
The reference number of th project/programme within the organization
D3: project/program period from
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
na
All responding organizations
6
2008-01-09
2012-01-01
When the project started/starts
2008-01-09
1
2008-09-24
1
2011-01-10
1
2012-01-01
3
D3: project/program period to
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
na
All responding organizations
6
2012-09-30
2014-05-31
End date
2012-09-30
4
2013-12-31
1
2014-05-31
1
D4: project location
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Project location
na
All responding organizations
7
0
Where the project is being carried out
Kinondoni, Kisasaswe
1
Morogoro, iringa, Lindi, Mtwara
1
National
1
Tanzania- central
1
district
1
ifakara
1
xx
1
D5: is prog/project for general development
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
General development project/programme with a family planning component
NA
na
All responding organizations
7
3
Project with family planning as a component only
0
5
1
2
Sysmiss
3
D5: is prog/project exclusively for family planning
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Project/programme exclusively dedicated to family planning
NA
na
All responding organizations
7
3
Projects that are exclusively for family planning
0
3
1
4
Sysmiss
3
D6: income received from other organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organizations/departments specificallyfor this project/programme in 2012
Tick appropriate box
na
All responding organizations
7
3
Income from other organizations specifically received for this project
0
7
Sysmiss
3
D6: type of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
NA
na
All responding organizations
2
0
Was the organization domestic or international
International
1
domestic
1
D6: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
na
All responding organizations
2
8
400000
17020400
8710200
11752397.546
Amount received from the said organization
D6: type of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
NA
na
All responding organizations
1
0
Was the organization domestic or international
domestic
1
D6: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
na
All responding organizations
1
9
Amount received from the said organization
245839672
1
Sysmiss
9
D6: type of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
NA
na
All responding organizations
1
0
Was the organization domestic or international
internationa
1
D6: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
NA
na
All responding organizations
1
9
Amount received from the said organization
239994254
1
Sysmiss
9
D7: total amount spent on family planning
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
537215499
162585178
218706519.398
Total expenitures incurred both recurrent and capital investments
D7: recurrent epenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (A. Recurrent expenses)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
537215499
121682823.3
205314022.773
Amount spent to operationalise the project
D7: capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (B. Capital investment)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
8983547
898354.7
2840846.999
Amount spent directly on the project
D8.1: internal service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
All responding organizations
1
9
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(amount)
511125
1
Sysmiss
9
D8.1: percentage of internak service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(percentage)
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
0
30
3
9.487
Percentage of amount spent on internal staff costs out of total recurrent expenses
D8.1.1: out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
10
D8.1.1: percentage of out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on out-patient services)
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on out-patient services
0
10
D8.1.2: inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on in-patient services)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
10
D8.1.2: percentage of inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on in-patient services)
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
0
10
D8.2: amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(amount)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on outsourcing of services
Sysmiss
10
D8.2: percentage of amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
0
10
D8.2.1: amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on out-patient services)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
10
D8.2.1: percentage of amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
0
10
D8.2.2: amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on in-patient services)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
10
D8.2.2: percentage of amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-percentage on in-patient services)
NA
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on outsourcing of services
0
10
D8.3: amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(amount)
NA
All responding organizations
2
8
17740
57397762
28707751
40573802.661
Amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
D8.3: percentage of amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(percentage)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
0
100
11.1
31.427
Amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
D8.3: percentage on condoms
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on condoms)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
0
21
2.1
6.641
Percentage of amount spent on condoms
D8.3: percentage on pills
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on pills)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
0
24
2.4
7.589
Percentage of amount spent on pills
D8.3: percentage on emergency contraceptives
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on emergency contaceptives)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on emergency contraceptives
0
9
6
1
D8.3: percentage on diaphragm
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on diaphragms)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on diaphragm
0
9
5
1
D8.3: percentage on injectables
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on injectables)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
0
100
11.5
31.451
Percentage of amount spent on injectables
D8.3: percentage on implants
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on implants)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on implants
0
9
9
1
D8.3: percentage on IUDs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on IUDs)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on IUDs
0
9
5
1
D8.3: percentage on standard days method
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on standard days method)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on standard days method
0
9
3
1
D8.3: percentage on medicine
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on medicine)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on medicine
0
9
7
1
D8.3: percentage on other consumables
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on other consumables)
Retailed & provided
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on other consumables
0
9
5
1
D8.4: amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Information, Education and Communication)
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
All responding organizations
2
8
5067
970000
487533.5
682310.668
Amount spent on Information, Education and Communication
D8.4: percentage of amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Information, Education and Communication)
NA
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
35
3.5
11.068
Percentage of amount spent on IEC
D8.5: amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Policy Development and Advocacy)
NA
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
All responding organizations
4
6
5067
271619375
70391847.5
134231415.613
Amount spent on policy development and advocacy
D8.5: percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Policy Development and Advocacy)
NA
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
0
7
2
1
5
1
10
1
D8.6: amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount MIS and HIS)
NA
All responding organizations
3
7
2534
19904700
6669819.667
11461850.97
Amount spent on MIS & HIS
D8.6: percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
0
7
4
1
7
1
10
1
D8.7: amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
NA
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
All responding organizations
3
7
15206
8689400
3157098
4805825.149
Amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
D8.7: percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
NA
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
All responding organizations
10
0
0
45
5.2
14.078
Percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
D8.8: amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Capacity building/ training)
NA
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
All responding organizations
4
6
5069
210805316
91607596.25
107304099.28
Amount spent on capacity building/training
D8.8: percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Capacity building/ training)
NA
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
30
7.4
12.554
Percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
D8.9: amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Program Management Staff costs)
NA
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
All responding organizations
5
5
0
185108191
57534171.6
81831278.832
Amount spent on program management staff costs
D8.9: percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Program Management Staff costs)
NA
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
69
11.5
22.849
Percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
D8.10: amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on opreational expenditures)
NA
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
All responding organizations
5
5
0
101442685
40985567.2
54794762.999
Amount spent on operational expenses
D8.10: percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
NA
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
All responding organizations
10
0
0
23
5.4
9.082
Percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
D8.11: other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
NA
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
All responding organizations
0
0
Recurrent expenditure on other services not listed above
D8.11: amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
NA
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
All responding organizations
2
8
0
12091000
6045500
8549628.091
Amount spent on other services not listed above
D8.11: percentage of amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on other services)
NA
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
All responding organizations
10
0
Percentage of amount spent on other services
0
10
total recurrent expenditure
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(Recurrent total)
NA
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
All responding organizations
4
6
1703750
537215499
304207058.25
228971606.122
Summation of all recurrrent expenditures categories
D8.12: amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
NA
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
10
D8.12: percentage of amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
NA
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
10
D8.13: amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
1
9
Amount spent on equipment
8983540
1
Sysmiss
9
D8.13: percentage of amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.1: amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on car purchase)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.1: percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on car purchase)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.2: amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(computer and ICT purchase)
NA
All responding organizations
1
9
Amount spent on computer and ICT
5988499
1
Sysmiss
9
D8.13.2: percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on computer and ICT)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.3: amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(office furniture)
NA
All responding organizations
1
9
Amount spent on office furniture
2995041
1
Sysmiss
9
D8.13.3: percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on office furniture)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.4: medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
0
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
D8.13.4: amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.4: percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on medical equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.5: amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.13.5: percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on equipment)(other equipment)
NA
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
10
D8.14: other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on other capital investment)
NA
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding organizations
0
0
Amount spent on other capital investment
D8.14: amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on other capital investment)
NA
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
10
D8.14: percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other capital investment)
NA
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding organizations
0
10
Percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
10
total capital investments
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (total capital investments)
NA
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding organizations
1
9
Summation of all categories of capital investments
8983540
1
Sysmiss
9
total sum of recurrent and capital expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (total capital investments)
NA
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
All responding organizations
1
9
Summation of all categories of capital investments
415282087
1
Sysmiss
9
D9: expenditures directly from organization to a project
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditures directly from organization to a project
0
5
1
2
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
2
0
Name of organization
MOHSW (RCHS-FP)
1
UMATI
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
2
8
100000
537215499
268657749.5
379798011.623
Amount to organization(s)
D9: expenditures directly to a government institution
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditures directly to a government institution
0
7
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
0
Name of organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount to organization(s)
Sysmiss
10
D9: expenditure directlty to another national NGO
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditures directly to a government institution
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
1
0
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)
Tanzania Red Cross Society
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Amount)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
1
9
Amounts paid to another national NGO/foundation
50661978
1
Sysmiss
9
D9: expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
0
7
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
0
Name of hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)(Amount)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount paid to hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
Sysmiss
10
D9: expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
0
7
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
0
Name of umbrella organization
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Amount)
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
10
Amount paid to umbrella organization
Sysmiss
10
D9: expenditure directly to other organizations
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
7
3
Expenditure paid directly to other organizations
0
7
Sysmiss
3
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
0
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
All responding organizations
0
10
Sysmiss
10
D10: percentage of adolescents
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
Proportion by percentage of adolescents targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
25
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of youth
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
Proportion by percentage of youth targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
15
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of women
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
4
6
5
100
47.5
39.686
Proportion by percentage of women targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
D10: percentage of men
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
3
7
5
50
25
22.913
D10: percentage of HIV positive individuals
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
6
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of migrants
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
0
10
Sysmiss
10
D10: percentage of sex workers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
5
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of healthcare workers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
20
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of employees
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
5
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of rural population
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
1
9
50
1
Sysmiss
9
D10: percentage of researchers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
0
10
Proportion by percentage of researchers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
10
D10: other poulation
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
2
0
General population
1
media advocacy
1
D10: percentage of other population
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
NA
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
All responding organizations
3
7
4
100
68
55.426
D11: specific age from
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
All responding organizations
3
7
Start of age range of target population
10
1
15
1
19
1
Sysmiss
7
D11: specific age to
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
NA
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
All responding organizations
3
7
End of age range of target population
45
1
49
2
Sysmiss
7
D12: objectives of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
Objectives of the project/programme:
NA
na
All responding organizations
6
Objectives of project/program
Engaging media for family planning advocacy
1
EnsureHIV positive and negative use of post partum family planning
1
Improved policy environment for family planning, increased resources for family planning, zero maternal health, 49 year old-reproductive health
1
Provide technical support to MOHSW to reposition FP program
1
To increase access and utilization of FP methods through promotion of LA/PM
1
ensure the availability of injectables in rural tanzania villages
1
Currency recorded
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
NA
na
10
0
1
Tsh
7
2
USD
3
Id of responding organization
na
na
na
NA
Responding government institution
4
0
A unique ID of responding organization
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
Organization code
APHRC
na
na
na
NA
Responding government institution
4
0
A code assigned specifially to a particular organization
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
A1: city
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
City
na
na
Responding government institution
2
0
City where the government department is located
Dar-es-salaam
2
A1: province
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Province
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The province where the government is located
A2: calendar year
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate whether you use 'calendar year' or 'financial year' in this questionnaire
na
na
Responding government institution
4
0
The financial records are such that the time period covered are within a calendar year or a financial year
0
3
1
1
A2: start of financial year
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
from
na
na
Responding government institution
4
2011-07-01
2012-07-01
Indicates start of the calendar year or financial year
2011-07-01
1
2012-07-01
3
A2: end of financial year
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
to
na
na
Responding government institution
4
2012-06-30
2013-06-30
Indicates end of the calendar year or financial year
2012-06-30
1
2013-06-30
3
A3: currency used
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Currency used throughout the questionnaire:
Responding government institution
4
0
The currency used in filling the questionnaire
1
Tsh
4
2
USD
0
A4: currency rate used
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Note: please use exchange rates provided in the annex of the manual
na
Responding government institution
4
0
The exchange rate of the currency used vis a vis the US dollar
1600
4
A5: administrative level of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
At what administrative level is your organisation working
na
na
Responding government institution
4
0
The level at which the department operates
0
No
2
1
Yes
2
A6: type of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate the type of your non-governmental organisation
na
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Type of organization
0
No
3
1
Yes
1
A6a: government department
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate the type of your organisation(Government department)
na
na
Responding government institution
4
0
The type of government department
1
Government department
4
2
University
0
3
Research institute
0
4
Central Stats office
0
6
Other
0
Other specify
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate the type of your organisation(Other)
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
To specify type of organization if not in the hierachy provided above
B1: name of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Name of organization)
na
Responding government institution
2
0
Name of organization
Basket
1
MOHSW
1
B1: government 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Government)(Yes or No)
na
Responding government institution
3
1
Is the organzation part of government
0
Non governmental
2
1
Government
1
Sysmiss
1
B1: administrative level 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Administrative level)
To identify the type of administrative level, use a) for central and b) for lower level (State/Province, Municipality, Region).
Responding government institution
0
4
Administrative level at which the organization works
0
Lower level
0
1
Central
0
Sysmiss
4
B1: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Amount)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
8875501825
3218875456.25
4216234332.284
Income received from that organization
B1: name of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Name of organization)
na
Responding government institution
1
0
Name of organization
GOT(DS)
1
B1: government 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Government)(Yes or No)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Is the organzation part of government
0
Non governmental
3
1
Government
1
B1: administrative level 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Administrative level)
To identify the type of administrative level, use a) for central and b) for lower level (State/Province,Municipality, Region).
Responding government institution
0
4
Administrative level at which the organization works
0
Lower level
0
1
Central
0
Sysmiss
4
B1: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Amount)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
1000000000
250000000
500000000
Income received from that organization
B1: name of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Name of organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B1: government 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Government)(Yes or No)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Is the organzation part of government
0
Non governmental
4
1
Government
0
B1: administrative level 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Administrative level)
To identify the type of administrative level, use a) for central and b) for lower level (State/Province, Municipality, Region).
Responding government institution
0
4
Administrative level at which the organization works
0
Lower level
0
1
Central
0
Sysmiss
4
B1: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Amount)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Income received from that organization
0
4
B1: name of organization 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Name of organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B1: government 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Government)(Yes or No)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Is the organzation part of government
0
Non governmental
4
1
Government
0
B1: administrative level 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Administrative level)
To identify the type of administrative level, use a) for central and b) for lower level (State/Province, Municipality, Region).
Responding government institution
0
4
Administrative level at which the organization works
0
Lower level
0
1
Central
0
Sysmiss
4
B1: amount received 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Amount)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Income received from that organization
0
4
B1: name of organization 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Name of organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B1: government 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Government)(Yes or No)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Is the organzation part of government
0
Non governmental
4
1
Government
0
B1: administrative level 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Administrative level)
Responding government institution
0
4
Administrative level at which the organization works
0
Lower level
0
1
Central
0
Sysmiss
4
B1: amount received 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning:(Amount)
na
Responding government institution
2
2
Income received from that organization
0
2
Sysmiss
2
B2: income generated from own sources
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income in 2012 for family planning, generated from own sources
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Income received from that organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
1
0
Name of organization
DFID
1
B3: country 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
1
3
The resident country of the funding of organization
1
UK
1
Sysmiss
3
B3: type 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
1
0
Type of organization
grant
1
B3: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
4800000000
1200000000
2400000000
Total amount of income from the organization
B3: name of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
1
0
Name of organization
UNFPA
1
B3: country 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The resident country of the funding of organization
1
UK
0
Sysmiss
4
B3: type 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
2880000000
720000000
1440000000
Total amount of income from the organization
B3: name of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The resident country of the funding of organization
1
UK
0
Sysmiss
4
B3: type 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The resident country of the funding of organization
1
UK
0
Sysmiss
4
B3: type 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The resident country of the funding of organization
1
UK
0
Sysmiss
4
B3: type 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 5
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 6
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 6
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The resident country of the funding of organization
B3: type 6
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 6
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 7
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 7
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The resident country of the funding of organization
B3: type 7
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 7
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 8
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 8
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The resident country of the funding of organization
B3: type 8
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 8
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 9
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 9
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The resident country of the funding of organization
B3: type 9
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 9
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Total amount of income from the organization
0
4
B3: name of organization 10
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Name f organization)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
B3: country 10
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Country)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
The resident country of the funding of organization
B3: type 10
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Type)
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of organization
B3: amount received 10
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning:(Amount received in 2012)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
7680000000
1920000000
3840000000
Total amount of income from the organization
B4: total income
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
NA
Responding government institution
4
0
0
17480000000
6588875456.25
8379972425.048
Summation of income from domestic, own and international sources
B5: total domestic expenditures
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Total domestic expenditures for family planning projects/programmes in 2012:
na
You are requested to summarise the total amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed domestically by your organisation for family planning activities in 2012 from your. Only include expenditures made both locally and abroad which benefited local family planning projects/programs or activities. For example, condoms purchased abroad but distributed within your country should be included. When calculating total expenditures for family planning projects/programmes, please include both direct and systems costs: all direct service delivery, drugs, supplies and personnel costs and programme and systems costs such as rent, upgrading of facilities, training and capacity building (see question C8).
Responding government institution
3
1
0
17700000000
8800409225.667
8850416811.354
Summation of income from domestic, own and international sources
B6: inclusion of salaries & non-personnel epenses in ependiture
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Does the amount of B 5 include salaries of proj./prog. personnel as well as non-personnel expenses? Yes or No
na
Please specify the amount of total expenditures that went for salaries and non-personnel/systems costs. If it is not possible to include salaries of project/programme personnel and non-personnel/systems costs in B 5, you are requested to give a reason for this in B 6. For example, it might be possible that your department only funds equipment, training and IEC materials, etc., while the salaries and the other recurrent costs are directly paid by the central government (e.g. Ministry of Finance).
Responding government institution
4
0
Are salaries included as part of total domestic expenditures
0
No
3
1
Yes
1
B6: reason for inclusion
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Reason:
na
Please specify the amount of total expenditures that went for salaries and non-personnel/systems costs. If it is not possible to include salaries of project/programme personnel and non-personnel/systems costs in B 5, you are requested to give a reason for this in B 6. For example, it might be possible that your department only funds equipment, training and IEC materials, etc., while the salaries and the other recurrent costs are directly paid by the central government (e.g. Ministry of Finance).
Responding government institution
1
0
Reason for exclusion or inclusion
Justproduct/item value
1
B6: amount for salaries/non-personnel ependiture
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Amount for salaries/non-personnel:
na
Please specify the amount of total expenditures that went for salaries and non-personnel/systems costs. If it is not possible to include salaries of project/programme personnel and non-personnel/systems costs in B 5, you are requested to give a reason for this in B 6. For example, it might be possible that your department only funds equipment, training and IEC materials, etc., while the salaries and the other recurrent costs are directly paid by the central government (e.g. Ministry of Finance).
Responding government institution
1
3
Amount of salaries
132000000
1
Sysmiss
3
B7: difference between incomes and expenditures
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 5 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (increasing the income in 2012) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in the different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
Responding government institution
4
0
Difference between total income and expenditures
0
No
3
1
Yes
1
B7: reason for difference
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Reason:
na
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 5 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (increasing the income in 2012) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in the different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
Responding government institution
2
0
Reason for the difference
other items still pending for delivery(awaiting delivery) on transit
1
salaries are notincluded in the FP program for suport, salaries are paid by the govt
1
C1: name of project/program
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Name of project/program spent on
na
Responding government institution
1
0
Name of project/program spent on
family planning
1
C2: project/program reference number
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Number for which the program/project is referenced
Sysmiss
4
C3: project/program period from
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Project/programme period: From
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The time when project/program activities began
Sysmiss
4
C3: project/program period to
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Project/programme period: To
na
Responding government institution
0
4
The time when project/program activities end
Sysmiss
4
C4: project location
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Project location (detailed):
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Where project activities are carried out
C5: is prog/project for general development
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
2
2
Is project/program for general development or family planning specifically
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C5: is prog/project exclusively for family planning
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
2
2
Is project/program for general development or family planning specifically
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C6: income received from other organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
2
2
Did the project/program receive funding
0
No
2
1
Yes
0
Sysmiss
2
C6: name of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
C6: type of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of Organization
C6: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Total income received for this project/program
Sysmiss
4
C6: name of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
C6: type of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of Organization
C6: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Total income received for this project/program
Sysmiss
4
C6: name of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
C6: type of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Type of Organization
C6: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Total income received for this project/program
Sysmiss
4
C7: total amount spent on family planning
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Summation of all expenditure on family planning
Sysmiss
4
C7: recurrent epenses
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization
Sysmiss
4
C7: capital investment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Capital investment
To identify the type of administrative level, use a) for central and b) for lower level (State/Province, Municipality, Region).
Responding government institution
0
4
Durable goods which were used in the production of goods and services.
Sysmiss
4
C8.1: internal service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(amount)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on internal staff costs
Sysmiss
4
C8.1: percentage of internak service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(percentage)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on internal staff costs out of total recurrent expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.1.1: out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
4
C8.1.1: percentage of out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage of amount on out-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on out-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
Sysmiss
4
C8.1.2: inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on in-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
4
C8.1.2: percentage of inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on in-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
Sysmiss
4
C8.2: amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(amount)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
Sysmiss
4
C8.2: percentage of amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.2.1: amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on out-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
4
C8.2.1: percentage of amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.2.2: amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on in-patient services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
4
C8.2.2: percentage of amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on in-patient services))
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on outsourcing of services
Sysmiss
4
C8.3: amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(amount)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
17600000000
6575305669.25
8416901597.351
Amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
C8.3: percentage of amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(percentage)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on contrceptives, medicines
Sysmiss
4
C8.3: percentage on contraceptives: condoms
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on condoms)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
27
6.75
13.5
Percentage of amount spent on condoms
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on pills)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
25
6.25
12.5
Percentage of amount spent on pills
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on emergency contaceptives
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
85
21.25
42.5
Percentage of amount spent on emergency contraceptives
C8.3: percentage on contraceptives: diaphragm
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on diaphragms)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on diaphragm
0
4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on injectables)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
48
12
24
Percentage of amount spent on injectables
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on implants)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on implants
0
3
10
1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on IUDs)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on IUDs
0
4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on standard days method)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on standard days method
0
4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on medicine)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on medicine
0
4
C8.3: percentage on contraceptives: on other consumables
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on other consumables)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
Percentage of amount spent on other consumables
0
3
15
1
C8.4: amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Information, Education and Communication
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on Information, Education and Communication
Sysmiss
4
C8.4: percentage of amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Information, Education and Communication)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on IEC
Sysmiss
4
C8.5: amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Policy Development and Advocacy)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Sysmiss
4
C8.5: percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Policy Development and Advocacy)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Sysmiss
4
C8.6: amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on MIS & HIS)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on MIS & HIS
Sysmiss
4
C8.6: percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
Sysmiss
4
C8.7: amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Sysmiss
4
C8.7: percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Sysmiss
4
C8.8: amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Capacity building/ training)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on capacity building/training
Sysmiss
4
C8.8: percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Capacity building/ training
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
Sysmiss
4
C8.9: amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Program Management Staff costs)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on program management staff costs
Sysmiss
4
C8.9: percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.10: amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on opreational expenditures)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on operational expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.10: percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Sysmiss
4
C8.11: other services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Recurrent expenditure on other services
C8.11: amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on other services
Sysmiss
4
C8.11: percentage of amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on other services)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on other services
Sysmiss
4
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Recurrent expenses are those which occur to produce the FP services in your organization E.g. the distribution of condoms, quarterly dissemination of FP information to employees and the resources involved to provide those services.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(Recurrent total)
na
Responding government institution
4
0
0
17600000000
4400000000
8800000000
Summation of all recurrrent expenditures categories
C8.12: amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
\Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
4
C8.12: percentage of amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Sysmiss
4
C8.13: amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.13: percentage of amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on equipment
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.1: amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(car purchase)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on car purchase
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.1: percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on car purchase)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.2: amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(computer and ICT purchase)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.2: percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on computer and ICT purchase)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.3: amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(office furniture)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on office furniture
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.3: percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on office furniture)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.4: medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
C8.13.4: amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.4: percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on medical equipment
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.5: amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other equipment)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.13.5: percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other equipment)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
4
C8.14: other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other)
na
Responding government institution
0
0
Specifying other equipment
C8.14: amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
4
C8.14: percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other capital investment)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Sysmiss
4
total capital investments
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your department for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (total capital investments)
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Summation of all categories of capital investments
Sysmiss
4
total sum of recurrent and capital expenses
Person responding on behalf of government department.
Durable goods which are used in the production of goods and services. E.g. purchase of a car or medical equipment which lasts longer than 1 year. Kindly estimate the amount which benefits FP.
na
Responding government institution
0
4
Summation of recurrent expenses and capital investments
Sysmiss
4
C9: expenditures directly from organization to a project
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditures directly from organization to a project
0
1
1
1
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
1
0
Name of organization
DFID
1
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
1
3
4800000000
4800000000
4800000000
Amount to organization(s)
C9: expenditures directly to a government institution
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditures directly to a government institution
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of organization
C9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount to government institution(s)
Sysmiss
4
C9: expenditure directlty to another national NGO
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditure directlty to another national NGO
0
1
1
1
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
1
0
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
UNFPA
1
C9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
1
3
2880000000
2880000000
2880000000
Amount to another national NGO/foundation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
C9: expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditure directlty to hospitals/ ambulances/pharmacies
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
C9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount paid to hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
Sysmiss
4
C9: expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of umbrella organization
C9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount paid to umbrella organization
Sysmiss
4
C9: expenditure directly to other organizations
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to other organisation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
2
2
Expenditure directly to other organizations
0
2
Sysmiss
2
C9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an other organisation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
0
Name of other organization
C9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to other organisation)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Responding government institution
0
4
Amount paid to other organization
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of adolescents
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of adolescents (10-19) targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of youth
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of youth(15-24) targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of women
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of women targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of men
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of men targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of HIV positive individuals
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of HIV positive individuals targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted.
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of migrants
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of migrants targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted.
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of sex workers
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of sex workers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted.
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of healthcare workers
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of healthcare workers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted.
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of employees
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of employees targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of rural population
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of rural population targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: percentage of researchers
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Proportion by percentage of researchers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
4
C10: other poulation
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
0
Proportion by percentage of other poulation (not in hierachy above) targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
C10: percentage of other population
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Responding government institution
0
4
Sysmiss
4
C11: specific age from
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
Responding government institution
1
3
Start of age range of target population
15
1
Sysmiss
3
C11: specific age to
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
Responding government institution
1
3
End of age range of target population
49
1
Sysmiss
3
C12: objectives of project/program
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
Objectives of the project/programme:
na
na
Responding government institution
1
Objectives of project/program
reduce maternal mortality rate, infant mortality rate, total fertility rate. Increase contraceptive prevalence rate, reduce unmet need for family planning
1
Recoded currency name in non-string
Person responding on behalf of government department.
na
na
na
Responding government institution
4
0
1
Tsh
4
2
USD
0
Id of responding organization
Respondent
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
A unique ID of responding organization
2
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
9
1
10
1
Organization code
Respondent
NA
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
A code assigned specifially to a particular organization
1
1
2
1
3
1
4
1
5
1
6
1
7
1
8
1
A1: city
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
City
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
City where the organzation is located
Addis Ababa
8
A1: province
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
The province where the organization is located
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
The province where the organization is located
Addis
1
Addis Ababa
7
A1: country
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Country
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
The country where the organization is located
Ethiopia
8
A1: position and unit of respondent
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Position and unit
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
The position held by the respondent and the unit underwhich he/she works
Deputy Director, Programmes
1
Execuive director
1
Health Projects Officer
1
Program Director
1
Program coordinator
1
Project Manager
1
Project officer
1
Senior Grant and Compliance Office
1
A2: calendar year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
na
All organizations with income and expenditure
8
0
The financial records are such that the time period covered are within a calendar year or a financial year
0
2
1
6
A2: start of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
from
na
na
All organizations with income and expenditure
8
2011-07-01
2012-01-01
Indicates start of the calendar year or financial year
2011-07-01
1
2012-01-01
7
A2: end of financial year
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
to
na
na
All organizations with income and expenditure
8
2012-06-30
2012-12-31
Indicates end of the calendar year or financial year
2012-06-30
1
2012-12-31
7
A3: currency used
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Currency used throughout the questionnaire:
All organizations with income and expenditure
8
0
The currency used in filling the questionnaire
1
Birr
7
2
USD
1
A4: currency rate used
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
All organiztions with financial information
8
0
15
20
18.429
1.917
The exchange rate of the currency used vis a vis the US dollar
A5: administrative level of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
At what administrative level is your organisation working
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
At what administrative level is the organisation working
0
No
3
1
Yes
5
A6: type of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate the type of your non-governmental organisation
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
Type of organization
0
No
4
1
Yes
4
A6a: type NGO
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
National NGO
na
na
All responding organizations
8
0
Specifically identifies the type of NGO from the hierachy provided
1
National NGO
5
2
Research institute
0
3
University
0
4
Umbrella organisation
0
6
Other
3
A6e: other Specify
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Other (specify)
na
na
All responding organizations
2
0
To specify type of NGO if not in the hierachy provided
Faith Based Local NGO
1
International NGO
1
B1: income from domestic sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received in 2012 from domestic sources for family planning
Amount
Any income received from domestic sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding organizations
8
0
0
65268
8158.5
23075.723
Income received from sources within the country
B2: income from international sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received in 2012 from international sources for family planning
Amount
Any income received from international sources should be mentioned here. A specification of this amount is requested in section C.
All responding organizations
8
0
0
101644404
13593317.241
35586333.654
Income received from sources that are not based within the country
B3: income from own sources
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income in 2012 for family planning, generated from own sources (e.g. members' contributions, user fees, interest earned on endowments, or forms of cost recovery)
Amount
Any income generated from own sources e.g. contributions, user fees, profits, interest earned on endowments, or forms of cost recovery.
All responding organizations
8
0
0
7818599
977324.875
2764292.186
Income generated by the organization from its own sources
B4: total income
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Total income for family planning in 2012:
Sum up the amounts provided in B1, B2 and B3.
All responding organizations
8
0
0
109463003
14578800.616
38346909.853
The summation of all sources of income
B5: total domestic expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Total domestic expenditures for family planning projects/programmes in 2012:
All responding organizations
8
0
0
92527009
12223582.26
32455899.572
Expenditures incurred on domestic activities
B6: total international expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Total international expenditures for family planning projects/programmes in 2012:
Amount
You are requested to summarise the total amount of money that has actually been spent/disbursed internationally by your organisation for family planning activities in 2012 and which did not directly benefit local FP activities. Note: a specification of international expenditures is NOT required in section D. Section D should only include domestic expenditures
All responding organizations
8
0
0
6254879
945292.624
2193638.302
Expenditures incurred on international activities
B7: total expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Total expenditures for family planning
Amount
Sum up the amounts provided in B5 and B6
All responding organizations
8
0
0
98791888
13170124.884
34603513.901
Summation of all expenditures incurred
B8: difference between incomes and expenditures
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 7 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (i.e. income) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in a different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
All responding organizations
8
0
Difference between income and expenitures
0
7
1
1
B8: reason for difference
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Specify reason
na
Compare the total amounts you have given in B 4 (total income) and B 7 (total expenditures). If the amounts are considerably different (e.g. the FP expenditures are much lower than the income received for FP or vice versa) please tick the 'yes' box and specify the reason. For example, it could be that a project which you received money for in 2012 (i.e. income) had a delay and expenditures for this project were made in a different year e.g. 2013. The total amount of expenditures in 2012 could therefore be lower than initially planned and therefore differ considerably from the income received.
Organizations with considerable difference in expenditure and income
3
Reason for the difference
The differecen of the organization's annual financial period and the funding agency grant agreement period
1
We are not engaged in local fundraising for FP
1
We did not start projects in 2012 but I 2013 and 2014. We have started 3 projects in Health
1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
7
0
Indicates the name of the funder
DKT INTERNATIONAL
1
David and Lucile Packard Foundation
1
IPAS
1
IPPF
1
PACT ETHIOPIA
1
Pathefinder-Ethiopia- Funded by the USAID
1
Private Donor
1
C1: country 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
7
1
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
4
2
UK
1
3
Ethiopia
1
4
Sweden
1
5
Netherlands
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: type 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
7
1
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
2
6
International NGO
3
7
Private for-profit company
1
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
1
C1: level 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
5
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
a
1
b
3
C1: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
8
0
0
7985965
1449471.375
2708246.704
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
3
0
Indicates the name of the funder
DAVID AND LUCIE PACKARD FOUNDATION
1
DFID
1
EFN
1
C1: country 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
3
5
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
1
2
UK
1
3
Ethiopia
0
4
Sweden
0
5
Netherlands
1
Sysmiss
5
C1: type 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
3
5
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
1
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
2
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
5
C1: level 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
8
0
0
52220193
6773873.616
18372743.68
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
CDC
1
C1: country 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Resident country of the funding organization
1
USA
1
2
UK
0
3
Ethiopia
0
4
Sweden
0
5
Netherlands
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: type 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
1
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
8
0
0
13364760
1670595
4725156.212
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
CHOICE/IPPF
1
C1: country 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
UK
1
C1: type 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 4
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
1114001
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
ISRAEL AID
1
C1: country 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
ISRAEL
1
C1: type 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
1
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 5
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
6500429
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
PATH
1
C1: country 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
1
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 6
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
4678364
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
DAVID AND LUCIE PACKARD FOUNDATION
1
C1: country 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
4526982
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
UNFPA
1
C1: country 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
UNITED NATIONS
1
C1: type 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 8
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
4147167
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
PPFK
1
C1: country 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
KOREA
1
C1: type 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
1
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 9
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
1728065
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
NISP/IPPF
1
C1: country 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
UK
1
C1: type 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 10
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
1641978
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
ETBASED ABORTION/IPPF
1
C1: country 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
UK
1
C1: type 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 11
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
1414345
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
FHI
1
C1: country 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 12
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
835734
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
1
C1: country 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 13
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
313057
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
JHU-TSHAQ
1
C1: country 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 14
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
227895
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
IPAS INTERNATIONAL
1
C1: country 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 15
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
220935
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
HEWLET FOUNDATION
1
C1: country 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 16
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
212193
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
POPULATION ACTION INTERNATIONAL
1
C1: country 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
1
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 17
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
151296
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
COMIC RELIEF FUND
1
C1: country 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
USA
1
C1: type 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 18
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
131682.22
131682.22
131682.22
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
OTHERS
1
C1: country 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
.
1
C1: type 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
0
6
International NGO
1
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 19
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
16185373
1
Sysmiss
7
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (Name of organization/government department)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Indicates the name of the funder
OWN SOURCES
1
C1: country 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (country of origin of the funding)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
0
Resident country of the funding organization
ETHIOPIA
1
C1: type 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (type)
1
Government department of your own country
0
2
Foreign government
0
3
UN organisation/agency
0
4
International development bank
0
5
National NGO
1
6
International NGO
0
7
Private for-profit company
0
8
Other organisations/individuals
0
Sysmiss
7
C1: level 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (level)
Organizations receiving domestic funding
1
0
Administative level of funder if domestic
A
1
C1: amount received 20
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
1
7
Total amount received in 2012 from a particular funder
7818599
1
Sysmiss
7
C1: total income
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Income received for family planning from domestic and international sources in 2012 (total amount)
na
All organization funded by other organizations
7
1
50000
109463003
16661486.419
40927769.664
Summation of all incomes from various funders
D1: name of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
Name of project/programme:
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
7
0
The title of the project
Addis Ababa University-Creating university girl knowledge on SRH
1
Addressing the SRH needs of adolescents and young people with special emphasis on adolescent girls
1
Awareness raised on FP
1
Economic and social empowerment of women
1
Expanding access to comprehensive abortion and contraceptive services
1
Family Planning Services Project
1
Family planning Project
1
D2: project/program reference number
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Reference number of project/ programme
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
7
1
1
2011
288.143
759.709
The reference number of th project/programme within the organization
D3: project/program period from
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
6
2008-10-01
2012-01-01
When the project started/starts
2008-10-01
1
2010-01-01
1
2011-03-01
1
2011-07-01
1
2012-01-01
2
D3: project/program period to
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
5
2012-12-31
2016-09-30
End date
2012-12-31
4
2016-09-30
1
D4: project location
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Project location
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
7
0
Where the project is being carried out
A.A Gulele in N-S Lafto Suvcim
1
Addis Ababa
2
Addis Ababa (Jidala sub city)
1
Amdiesa, Oromia, SNNP, Tigray and addis Ababa Regions
1
Amhara regional state, semere shiwa zone, morehabeta, marta-jiru and Ensaro Waredas
1
Sanir, Heidya, Kambaffa, Dawuro, Halabra special Wareda
1
D5: is prog/project for general development
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
General development project/programme with a family planning component
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
7
1
Project with family planning as a component only
0
4
1
3
Sysmiss
1
D5: is prog/project exclusively for family planning
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Project/programme exclusively dedicated to family planning
na
na
Organizations with new and/or continuing family planning projects
7
1
Projects that are exclusively for family planning
0
3
1
4
Sysmiss
1
D6: income received from other organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organizations/departments specificallyfor this project/programme in 2012
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
7
1
Income from other organizations specifically received for this project
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D6: type of organization 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
1
0
Was the organization domestic or international
International
1
D6: amount received 1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
1
7
Amount received from the said organization
500000
1
Sysmiss
7
D6: type of organization 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
0
0
Was the organization domestic or international
D6: amount received 2
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
0
8
Amount received from the said organization
Sysmiss
8
D6: type of organization 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (type)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
0
0
Was the organization domestic or international
D6: amount received 3
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Was income received from other organisations/departments specifically for this project/programme in 2012 (amount received in 2012)
na
na
Organizations that received funding for a particular project from another organization
0
8
Amount received from the said organization
Sysmiss
8
D7: total amount spent on family planning
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
98781888
13168874.884
34599979.092
Total expenitures incurred both recurrent and capital investments
D7: recurrent epenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (A. Recurrent expenses)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
90734339
12113330.243
31774395.39
Amount spent to operationalise the project
D7: capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Amount spent/disbursed by your organisation for family planning in this project/programme in 2012 (B. Capital investment)
Note: the total amount should be equal to the sum of A + B amounts provided in question D8.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
8047549
1055544.64
2826798.883
Amount spent directly on the project
D8.1: internal service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
6
2
10000
30133541
5186703.725
12222026.194
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(amount)
D8.1: percentage of internak service staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
100
24.875
33.065
Percentage of amount spent on internal staff costs out of total recurrent expenses
D8.1.1: out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on out-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
8
D8.1.1: percentage of out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on out-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on out-patient services)
0
8
D8.1.2: inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-amount on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on internal staff costs specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
8
D8.1.2: percentage of inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(internal service staff costs-percentage on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on internal service staff costs
0
8
D8.2: amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
2
6
47913
64284
56098.5
11576.045
Amount spent on outsourcing of services
D8.2: percentage of amount spent on outsourced services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
0
7
3
1
D8.2.1: amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on out-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically out-patient services
Sysmiss
8
D8.2.1: percentage of amount spent on out-patient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on outsourcing of services out of total recurrent expenses
0
8
D8.2.2: amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-amount on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on outsourcing of services specifically in-patient services
Sysmiss
8
D8.2.2: percentage of amount spent on inpatient services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(outsourcing of services-percentage on in-patient services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include any costs that were made on FP services that were outsourced. For example, if you hired an organization to carry out any FP-related tasks for you (e.g. setting up an Health Information System and providing training to your staff) include those costs here. Also include co-payments or small contributions you made for trainings provided by the public sector/NGOs for training your staff in FP-related activities, such as contraceptives and promoting FP in the workplace or community.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on in-patient services out of total amount spent on outsourcing of services
0
8
D8.3: amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(amount)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
4
4
44840
9025021
2374578.4
4434945.804
Amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
D8.3: percentage of amount spent on contraceptive,medicines
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (contraceptives, medicine & other consumables)(percentage)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
25
6.75
10.152
Percentage of amount spent on contraceptives, medicine & other consumables
D8.3: percentage on condoms
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on condoms)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
40
7.875
14.407
Percentage of amount spent on condoms
D8.3: percentage on pills
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on pills)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
60
10.25
20.769
Percentage of amount spent on pills
D8.3: percentage on emergency contraceptives
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on emergency contaceptives)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on emergency contraceptives
0
6
1
2
D8.3: percentage on diaphragm
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on diaphragms)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on diaphragm
0
8
D8.3: percentage on injectables
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on injectables)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
80
12.25
28.09
Percentage of amount spent on injectables
D8.3: percentage on implants
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on implants)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
38
8.875
16.488
Percentage of amount spent on implants
D8.3: percentage on IUDs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on IUDs)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
33
4.75
11.548
Percentage of amount spent on IUDs
D8.3: percentage on standard days method
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on standard days method)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on standard days method
0
7
2
1
D8.3: percentage on medicine
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on medicine)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on medicine
0
7
5
1
D8.3: percentage on other consumables
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage on other consumables)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
34
4.875
11.898
Percentage of amount spent on other consumables
D8.4: amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Information, Education and Communication)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all family planning related disbursements made in 2012 for IEC, including advertising campaigns, media or any other ways of communicating FP messages. IEC is considered to be a collective service aimed at the whole or groups of population (say, all health care workers within a facility or a whole community) with the aim to improve overall health standards of the effectiveness and efficiency of the health system, which benefits all users simultaneously (System of Health Accounts, 2011).
Organizations with family planning projects
4
4
55000
7013823
1947118.743
3383524.521
Amount spent on Information, Education and Communication
D8.4: percentage of amount spent on IEC
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Information, Education and Communication)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all family planning related disbursements made in 2012 for IEC, including advertising campaigns, media or any other ways of communicating FP messages. IEC is considered to be a collective service aimed at the whole or groups of population (say, all health care workers within a facility or a whole community) with the aim to improve overall health standards of the effectiveness and efficiency of the health system, which benefits all users simultaneously (System of Health Accounts, 2011).
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
40
7.375
13.887
Percentage of amount spent on IEC
D8.5: amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Policy Development and Advocacy)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amount spent on policy development and advocacy
441881
1
Sysmiss
7
D8.5: percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Policy Development and Advocacy)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include and add up all 2012 disbursements for family planning policy development and advocacy projects/programmes. Activities involve problem identification, benefits and importance of solving the problem, and portraying these problems and solutions to important stakeholders such as decision makers or funders. Include the cost of time contributed by staff for policy development/advocacy activities or donated rooms for holding such activities. Also include any policy work that is related to FP, sensitization of law makers regarding the importance of FP laws and policies and the formulation itself of FP laws and policies.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on policy development and advocacy
0
7
1
1
D8.6: amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount MIS and HIS)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
2193601.5
2193601.5
2193601.5
Amount spent on MIS & HIS
D8.6: percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on MIS & HIS
0
7
2
1
D8.7: amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
Organizations with family planning projects
4
4
5000
2193601.5
584696.663
1073247.761
Amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
D8.7: percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Monitoring, Evaluation and Research)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider all monitoring and evaluation and research activities related to family planning in 2012. These include data collection, data analysis and the costs involved to perform these two tasks (e.g. the compensation of those collecting the data, providing the data, etc.)
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on monitoring, evaluation & research
0
5
1
1
3
1
6
1
D8.8: amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Capacity building/ training)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
212623
6653488
1720176.876
2767875.675
Amount spent on capacity building/training
D8.8: percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Capacity building/ training)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all training or capacity building activities for any of the specific items mentioned in D 8. For example, training on how to monitor and evaluate (D 8.7) a FP program or training on IEC (D 8.4) should be included here.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
76
18.5
27.287
Percentage of amount spent on capacity building/training
D8.9: amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on Program Management Staff costs)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
20000
5589143
1210543.298
2449235.467
Amount spent on program management staff costs
D8.9: percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on Program Management Staff costs)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Program management involves decision making regarding the optimization of service delivery to ensure the goals of the program are reached. It involves the planning, organizing, directing, and controlling of company resources. Include salaries of staff which did not provide direct FP services (salaries of staff providing direct services should be included under D 8.1). Also consider program management related costs regarding hiring/firing of staff costs, processing salaries, staff meetings, and any other program management related costs which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, if a program goal is to disseminate free condoms to a whole community, you will need to know how many condoms are needed in order to satisfy this need, how many health care workers you need in order to distribute these condoms and provide information on them, etc. - this operational planning should be included here.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on program management staff costs
0
4
4
1
6
1
8
1
10
1
D8.10: amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on opreational expenditures)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
5000
18202421
3776218.676
8065292.525
Amount spent on operational expenses
D8.10: percentage of amount spent on operational expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on opreational expenditures)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Expenses associated with administering a business on a day to day basis. Some operational costs are fixed, meaning that each cost is identical from month to month, such as rent. However, other operational costs are variable and may go up or down from month to month, such as utilities. Operational costs include electricity, rent of the building, equipment rental, accounting expenses, utilities (e.g. phone bills), office supplies (e.g. paper, notebooks, etc.), insurance fees, travel expenses or other expenses related to the operation of the organization implementing family planning project/programme.
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
0
4
2
1
18
1
20
2
D8.11: other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Recurrent expenditure on other services not listed above
Direct FP services
1
D8.11: amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(amount on other: please specify)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amount spent on other services not listed above
9288817
1
Sysmiss
7
D8.11: percentage of amount spent on other services
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(percentage on other services)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
Organizations with family planning projects
8
0
Percentage of amount spent on other services
0
7
10
1
total recurrent expenditure
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012(Recurrent total)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other costs not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012. Please specify which recurrent expenses!
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
10000
90734339
13821663.134
33920858.862
Summation of all recurrrent expenditures categories
D8.12: amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
Organizations with family planning projects
2
6
40000
140079.75
90039.875
70767.07
Amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
D8.12: percentage of amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on infrastructure and upgrading of facilities)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Include all expenses incurred for infrastructure and upgrading of facilities which benefitted family planning projects/programmes in 2012. For example, include building expenses, rehabilitation expenses or any other expenses incurred to improve/build the facilities.
Organizations with family planning projects
2
6
49
100
74.5
36.062
Percentage amount spent on infrastructure & upgrading facilities
D8.13: amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
3
5
16248.84
8047549
2730814.163
4604770.374
Amount spent on equipment
D8.13: percentage of amount spent on equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
3
5
40
100
61.667
33.292
Percentage of amount spent on equipment
D8.13.1: amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(car purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
17152.6
17152.6
17152.6
Amount spent on car purchase
D8.13.1: percentage of amount spent on car purchase
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on car purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Percentage of amount spent on car purchase
6
1
Sysmiss
7
D8.13.2: amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(computer and ICT purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
12186.63
12186.63
12186.63
Amount spent on computer and ICT
D8.13.2: percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on car purchase)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Percentage of amount spent on computer and ICT
30
1
Sysmiss
7
D8.13.3: amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(office furniture)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
12186.63
12186.63
12186.63
Amount spent on office furniture
D8.13.3: percentage of amount spent on office furniture
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (Percentage of amount on office furniture)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Percentage of amount spent on office furniture
30
1
Sysmiss
7
D8.13.4: medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
0
Amount spent on a specific medical equipment
D8.13.4: amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(medical equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on medical equipment
Sysmiss
8
D8.13.4: percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on medical equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Percentage of amount spent on medical equipment
Sysmiss
8
D8.13.5: amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on equipment)(other equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
8
D8.13.5: percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on equipment)(other equipment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Percentage of amount spent on other equipment
Sysmiss
8
D8.14: other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on other capital investment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Amount spent on other capital investment
Car maintenance
1
D8.14: amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (amount on other capital investment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
Organizations with family planning projects
2
6
30309
155000
92654.5
88169.852
Amount spent on other capital investment
D8.14: percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (percentage of amount on other capital investment)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Percentage of amount spent on other capital investment
100
1
Sysmiss
7
total capital investments
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (total capital investments)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
30309
8047549
1688871.424
3556244.716
Summation of all categories of capital investments
total sum of recurrent and capital expenses
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Breakdown of amount spent/disbursed by your organization for family planning for this project/programme in 2012 (A+B)
In case you cannot provide amounts, please provide estimated percentages.
Consider any other expenses incurred not mentioned in the above categories which benefited family planning projects/programmes in 2012.
Organizations with family planning projects
6
2
50000
98781888
17475166.512
39836981.136
Summation of recurrent expenses and capital investments
D9: expenditures directly from organization to a project
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditures directly from organization to a project
0
3
1
4
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
4
0
FINOTE HEROGEN AID ORGANIZATION
1
PACT ETHIOPIA
1
SCS.DASSC
1
YWCA
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly (Directly from your organisation to project/programme)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
4
4
3320
1351407.07
755638.018
620798.429
Amount to organization(s)
D9: expenditures directly to a government institution
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditures directly to a government institution
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Name of organization
FAMILY GUIDANCE ASSOCIATION ETHIOPIA
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amount to government institution(s)
5640
1
Sysmiss
7
D9: expenditure directlty to another national NGO
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditure directlty to another national NGO
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)
ADDIS TESFA INTEGRATTED COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:( Directly to another national NGO/foundation)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amounts paid to another national NGO/foundation
3504
1
Sysmiss
7
D9: expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditure directlty to hospitals, ambulances & pharmacies
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Name of hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
SAVE YOUR GENERATION
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to hospitals, ambulances, pharmacies, and other health care providers)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amount paid to hospitals/ambulances/pharmacies/other health care providers
4925
1
Sysmiss
7
D9: expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditure directly to an umbrella organization
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Name(s) of organisation(s))
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
Name of umbrella organization
ORGANIZATION FOR SOCIAL SERVICES FOR AIDS (OSSA)
1
D9: amount disbursed
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Organisation to which expenditures for this project/programme were made directly:(Directly to an umbrella organisation)(Amount)
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
Amount paid to umbrella organization
4431
1
Sysmiss
7
D9: expenditure directly to other organizations
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
7
1
Expenditure directly to other organizations
0
6
1
1
Sysmiss
1
D9: name of organization
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
0
JERUSALEM CHILDREN AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION
1
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Expenditures for projects/programmes can either be channelled directly to a project or programme, or can be made through another channel, e.g. government department or another organisation. In case expenditures are made through another department/organisation you are requested to mention the first channel (step 1 in the figure below). Please mention the name(s) of the organization (s) through which funding was channelled and the amount.
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
4892
1
Sysmiss
7
D10: percentage of adolescents
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
2
6
40
1
50
1
Sysmiss
6
D10: percentage of youth
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
7
70
44
24.525
D10: percentage of women
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
5
3
20
97
46.4
32.47
Proportion by percentage of women targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
D10: percentage of men
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
3
5
10
2
19
1
Sysmiss
5
D10: percentage of HIV positive individuals
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D10: percentage of migrants
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D10: percentage of sex workers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D10: percentage of healthcare workers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
1
7
33
1
Sysmiss
7
D10: percentage of employees
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D10: percentage of rural population
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D10: percentage of researchers
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Proportion by percentage of researchers targeted by the project/programme out of the total population targeted
Sysmiss
8
D10: other poulation
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Please indicate a percentage to the population which was targeted during this FP project/programme.
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
0
D10: percentage of other population
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
). If you targeted only 18 year olds for example, you can put 100% for either adolescents or youth.
Due to the fact that these categories are not mutually exclusive, any target population which has an overlap of categories should be specified under 'Other'. For example, if a project/programme specifically targeted female sex workers (meaning both Women and Sex workers categories would be applicable) you should write 'female sex workers' next to Other and assign 100% of the disbursed amount to this population. If this project/programme targeted the general population, write 'All' under 'Other' and assign 100% to this category.
Make sure to indicate the specific age in question D 10 to avoid confusion!]]>
Organizations with family planning projects
0
8
Sysmiss
8
D11: specific age from
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
Organizations with family planning projects
3
5
Start of age range of target population
10
1
15
2
Sysmiss
5
D11: specific age to
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
Indicate the specific ages which this project/programme targeted, e.g. from ages 18 to 25 years. If the target age group was only 18-year-olds, write “from 18 to 18 years”. If the target age was 18 years and above, simply write “18+”.
Organizations with family planning projects
3
5
24
55
42.667
16.442
End of age range of target population
D12: objectives of project/program
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
Objectives of the project/programme:
na
na
Organizations with family planning projects
6
Objectives of project/program
1. To empower young women to demand and utilize SRH/FP information and services. To improve access and utilization of SRH/FP services among young women by fostering referral linkage with private and public health providers. To enhance community
1
REMARK: The expenditure for Fp is estimated out of the total expenditure since FP is part of out integratted RH intervention for IPAS and we don't have a separate financial report for it. The estimation for human resource and other operational
1
Remarks: FGAE had categorized its sevices expenditure by major activities to increase acces to quality FP services, adolescent and youth SRH services, capacity building, etc. Hence we estimate the FP services based on the INPUT that the major a
1
Remarks: Our organization is highly engaged in RH/FP after 2012. During the study period, we had no local or international partners (except IPAS).
1
To economic, social and health empowerment of women in the targetted area
1
To enhance knowledge of SRH among young people
1
Recoded currency used
Person responding on behalf of the NGO.
na
na
na
8
0
1
Birr
7
2
USD
1