Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1210 | 1 |
100%
|
|
403 the respondent said can take care of the person but if the situation is worse he can not. | 1 | ||
511 - SHOULD ONLY BE MADE AVAILABLE IN HEALTH CARE CENTERS 515 - TESTING OF CHILDREN AND INFANTS IS NOT AN ABUSE | 1 | ||
511 NOT TO BE SOLD IN LOCAL SHOPS DUE TO COUNTERFEITS, RATHER IN COMMUNITY TRUSTED CENTERS LIKE CHURCHES, HOSPITALS AND SCHOOL | 1 | ||
511- SHOULD BE SOLD IN CHEMISTS AND NOT REGULAR RETAIL SHOPS. | 1 | ||
515 - DOES NOT CONSIDER TESTING INFANTS AS AN ABUSE. 517 - WILL INCREASE AS PEOPLE MAY NOT CONSIDER THE RULES OF THE WINDOW PERIOD WHEN USING THE SELF TESTING KIT | 1 | ||
515 - TESTING CHILDREN AND SPOUSES IS NOT AN ABUSE | 1 | ||
515 TESTING CHILDREN AND INFANTS NOT AN ABUSE | 1 | ||
515- Coerced testing between spouses is not an abuse. Interview was done on 30th August from 12:40pm-13:15pm | 1 | ||
515- Corced testing of children and spouses is not an abuse according to respondent, and also in domestic workers. | 1 | ||
515- RESPONDENT DOES NOT CONSIDER TESTING OF CHILDREN AND INFANTS AN ABUSE. Questionnaire done on paper on 2nd September between 19:21 pm-20:02 pm But input on netbook laer | 1 | ||
515- RESPONDENT DOES NOT CONSIDER TESTING OF CHILDREN AND INFANTS AN ABUSE. Questionnaire done on paper questionnaire on 2nd Sept between 18:17pm-19:00pm | 1 | ||
515- Spouses coercing each other to self test is not an abuse. Testing of children, infants and employees is also not an abuse. Interview done on 30th August from 17:08 pm - 17:43 pm | 1 | ||
515- Testing of children is not an abuse according to respondent. | 1 | ||
515-DOES CONSIDER COERCED TESTING OF CHILDREN AND EMPLOYEES AN ABUSE. | 1 | ||
A 45YR OLD MAN LEAVING IN PARENTS HOME (sEPARATED WITH WIFE) | 1 | ||
A GOOD AND ATTENTIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
A GOOD AND HONEST RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
A GOOD AND VERY HONEST RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
A GOOD BUT SLOW RESPONDENT AS HE LOOKED SICK DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 | ||
A GOOD INTERVIEW AS THE RESPONDENT WAS CORPARETIVE AND CLEAR | 1 | ||
A GOOD INTERVIEW THOUGH RESISTED IN THE BEGINING. | 1 | ||
A GOOD INTERVIEWEE WHO WAS EXPLAINING MOST OF HIS POINTS | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO ALMOST REFUSED TO GIVE ME AUDIENCE CLAIMING THAT APHRC DOES NOT INFORM THEM OF THE STUDIES AND THE OUTCOME (INFORMATION ) WITH THEM. THE REPONCE AREA F Q506 b IS NOT ACTIVE "TRAINED COUNSELOR" WAS THE RESPONCE | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO INSISTED THAT THE KIT WAS MENT FOR SELF TESTING AND NOT PREVENTING THE SPRED OF HIV THEREFORE COULD NOT SAY WHETHER IT COULD REDUCE OR INCREASE THERATE OF SPREAD | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO IS A TRAINED P1 TEACHER. | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO IS MARRIED AND LEAVES IN MACHAKOS BUT THE WIFE LEAVES IN NAIROBI. | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO WAS EVEN READY TO TAKE THE TEST. | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO WAS REALLY IN SUPPORT OF SELF TESTING. | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT WHO WAS VERY ATTENTIVE | 1 | ||
A GOOD, INFORMED AND FRIENDLY RESPONDENT. | 1 | ||
A HONEST RESPONDENT WHO CONFESSED THAT HE HAS SEVERAL SEX PARTNERS AND DOES NOT USE PRACTICE PROTECTED SEX. | 1 | ||
A MASTERS GRADUATE WHO REALY SUPPORTED THE KIT THOUGH WAS WORRIED THAT MANY PEOPLE WOULD SELF TEST WITHOUT SEEKING CAUNCELLING. | 1 | ||
A PhD HOLDER WHO UNDERSTOOD THE ISSUES DISCUSED WELL. | 1 | ||
A RESPONSIBLE RESPONDENT WHO HAS LOS TWO BROTHERS TO THE HIV VIRUS AND WAS VERY SERIOUS WITH HIS ANSWERS. | 1 | ||
A SHARP YOUNG RESPONDENT WHO REALY KNOWS ENOUGH AS FAR AS HIV/AID IS COSERNED | 1 | ||
A VERY GOOD AND ATTENTIVE ESPONDENT WHO ELABORATED HIS ANSWERS IN ALL THE QUESTIONS. THI INTERVIEW WAS DONE HALF WAY AND COMPLETED ON 21/08/2013. | 1 | ||
A VERY GOOD AND RESPONSIBLE RESPONCES. | 1 | ||
A WELL INFORMED REPONDENT WHO UNSWERED ALL THE QUESTIONS WELL. | 1 | ||
A YOUNG RESPONDENT BUT VERY EMPOWERED WHO KEPT ASKING QUESTIONS DURING THE INTERVIEW. | 1 | ||
AT QUESTION 406 THE RESPONDENT GOT OFFENDED AND ASKED WHY AM ASKING STUPID QUESTIONS AND VERY PERSONAL.SHE REFUSED TO ANSWER AND WALKED AWAY. | 1 | ||
CLAIMES THAT HE HAD SEEN THE ORAL SELF TESTING KIT BEFORE | 1 | ||
DONE IN A QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 | ||
DONE IN A QUESTIONNAIRE | 10 | ||
DONE IN HE QUESTINNAIRE | 1 | ||
DONE IN QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 | ||
DONE IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 | ||
FRIENDLY RESPONDENT WHO RESPONDED WELL TO THE QUESTIONS. (INTERVIIEW DONE ON PAPER QUESTIONAIRE) | 1 | ||
First did the interview on paper questionairre then transfered to the netbook start time 10.45 finish time 11.25am | 1 | ||
GOOD AND SEAMINGLY HONEST REPONDENT. | 1 | ||
GOOD BUT SEAMED NOT MUCH INFORMED | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW THOUGH AT TIMES HE WAS IRRELEVANT | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW THOUGH THERE WAS A SHORT BREAK OF 8 MINUTES AS THERESPONDENT WA CALLED BY A NEIGHBOUR TO HELP DO SOME WORK | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW, | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW. | 2 | ||
GOOD RESPONDENT | 4 | ||
GOOD RESPONDENT WHO GAVE FULL UNSWERS. | 1 | ||
HE INSISTED THAT THE KIT IS ONLY GOOD FOR THOSE WHO HAVE TAKEN HIV TESTS BEFORE AND ALREADY KNOW THEIR STATUS BUT ONLY WANT TO CONFIRM. | 1 | ||
HE RWAS A GOOD RESPONDENT BUT EVEN AFTER EXPLAINING TO HIM THAT I WAS NOT GOING TO TEST HIS HIV STATUS WAS VERY AFRAID AND I SUSPECT THAT WHEN I ASKED Q502 HIS NO RESPONCE WAS FOR THE SAME REASON. | 1 | ||
HE SAID HE COULD NOT TALK MUCH ABOUT THE KIT AS IT WAS HIS FIRST TIME TO HEAR ABOUT IT OTHERWISE HE WAS A VERY GOOD RESPONDENT. | 1 | ||
I DID THIS INTERVIEW ON A PAPER BECAUSE MY NETBOOK HAD NO CHARGE THEN TRANFERED IT IN THE NETBOOK. I DID IT ON 14/09/2013, START TIME:15:30, END TIME 16:25 | 1 | ||
I DID THIS INTERVIEW ON A PAPER BECAUSE MY NETBOOK HAD NO CHARGE THEN TRANFERED IT IN THE NETBOOK. I DID IT ON 14/09/2013, START TIME: 13:15, END TIME: 14:09 | 1 | ||
I WAS INTERVEIWING HER WELL SHE WAS SERVING THE COSTUMERS | 1 | ||
I did this interview on paper,because may gadtet failled to function then transfered it | 1 | ||
IGNORE THIS BECAUSE NO INTERVIEW WAS STARTED | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW DONE 26/08/2013 , STARTED 1809HRS | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW DONE 26/08/2013, FROM 1930HRS | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
IT WAS A CALL BACK BUT I COULD NOT OPEN A NEW QUESTIONNEIRE BECAUSE I WAS NOT SURE IF I WILL EVER GET THE RESPONDENT | 3 | ||
IT WAS TAKING TIME FOR HER TO UNDERSTAND THE QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
Inerview went well | 1 | ||
Interview done on 1st Septmber 2013 from 18:55- 19:37 on paper but input later due to insecurity using netbook in the area in the evening | 1 | ||
Interview done on 2nd September 2013 on paper qustionnaire between 16:25-17:08 | 1 | ||
Interview done on 2nd on paper questionnaire between 10:12-10:43 | 1 | ||
Interview was done on paper questionnaire and input later due to power failure in the field | 1 | ||
Interview was done on paper questionnaire first then transferred to the netbook later. | 1 | ||
Interview was done on paper questionnaire then later transferred too netbook. | 1 | ||
Interview was going well until Qstn.513 when the respondents mother came in. The respondent was intimidated but completed the questinnaire in a hurry | 1 | ||
Interview went well although the young child distructed us. The respondent did not really understand the use of the kit and questions on abuse of the kit | 1 | ||
Interview went well although there were a few interruptions. | 1 | ||
Interview went well with no interruptions | 1 | ||
Interview went well. The respondent was optimistic about the testing kit. | 1 | ||
It is not a bad idea, it is nice and useful but Winnie thinks it is advisable for the counsellors to use it instead of being sold in the shops..It is better for one to be counselled before the use of the kit. Other questions- can u date a HIV p | 1 | ||
N0NE | 1 | ||
NON E | 1 | ||
NONE | 256 | ||
None | 3 | ||
REFUSAL | 1 | ||
RESPODENT REQUESTED IF THE KITS COULD BE AVAILED TO RESIDENTS FREELY SINCE THERE IS NO A VCT IN THE AREA. | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT HAD A GOOD COMPREHENSION OF ISSUES BEING DISCUSSED AND THUS THE INTERVIEW FLOWED SMOOTHLY | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT HAS A WORKING TV BUT PROBLEM WITH POWER CONNECTION. | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT IN A WAY GAVE CONFLICTING ANSWERS. HE ALSO PREFERED ONE WORD ANSWERS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO ANSWER 406 | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT REQUIRED A LOT OF CLARIFICATION AND EXAMPLES IN ORDER TO UNDERSTAND QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT SEEMED A BIT SLOW IN UNDERSTANDING QUESTIONS AS HIS KISWAHILI, ENGLISH AND SHENG SKILLS ARE LOW AND THUS MADE IT DIFFICULT IN CLARIFYING QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT SEEMS NOT TO UNDERSTAND CLEARLY PARTICULAR QUESTIONS EVEN WITH FURTHER EXPLANATIONS EG 515 B AND 305. THE INTERVIEW HOWEVER WENT ON SMOOTHLY | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT STRESSED ON THE KIT TO BE SOLD ONLY IN THE GOVERNMENT CARE CENTERS AS IT IS THE ONLY WAYTO COUNTERFEITS ARE NOT PRODUCED. 515 TESTING CHILDREN AND INFANTS IS NOT AN ABUSE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS A BIT SHY IN RESPONDING TO QUESTIONS HE FELT WERE PERSONAL | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS SLOW GRASPING QUESTIONS EVEN WITH CLARIFICATIONS AND EXAMPLES BEING USED. | 1 | ||
Respondent agrees that face to face counselling should be available at the hospital | 1 | ||
Respondent also added that the television does not highlight HIV/AIDS issues as much as radios and other forms of media | 1 | ||
Respondent seemed to answer some questions just to get over the interview. | 1 | ||
Respondent was very shy and seemed uncomfortable in airing his opinions. Interview done on 1st September 2013 from 17:55 pm- 18:25 pm | 1 | ||
Respondent's husband and child walked in while the interview was on going, and insisted to stay to the end of the interview | 1 | ||
SHE PROPOSED THE COST OF ONE KITS TO BE 50-100/= | 1 | ||
SHE WANTED TO KNOW THE COST PER KIT. SHE ALSO REQUESTED IF I CAN GIVE HER ONE KIT TO TEST HER SELF | 1 | ||
SHE WAS VERY MUCH CONCERN ON THE COST OF ONE KITS | 1 | ||
SHE WAS WORRIED ABOUT KIT DISPOSAL. SHE THEN GAVE AN EXAMPLE OF HOW PEOPLE HAVE BEEN DISPOSING CONDOMS WRONGLY. | 1 | ||
SOMETIMES GAVE CONTRADICTING ANSWERS. | 1 | ||
START TIME 1214 FINISH TIME 1322 | 1 | ||
START TIME 1224 | 1 | ||
START TIME 1444 FINISH TIME 1533 | 1 | ||
STARTED AT 09:30AM AND ENDED AT10:14AM | 1 | ||
TESTED LAST FOR HIV 6 YEARS AGO. | 1 | ||
THE COMPLETE TIME IN THE COVER SHEET IS THE CORRECT ONE.I OPENED THE SECOND ONE BY MISTAKE | 1 | ||
THE CORRECT DATE OF INTERVIEW WAS ON 01 08 2013 DONE IN A QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 | ||
THE CORRRECT START TIME IS 12.20 | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW AWS DONE WITH PAPER QUESTIONNAIRE AND LATER TRANSFERRED TO THE NETBOOK BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS MINDING ABOUT HIS BUSINESS WHICH WAS SOME METRES FROM THE BUSINEES THUS THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED OUTSIDE WHICH WAS LOOKING QUITE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW STARTED AT 17:51PM AND ENDED AT 18:27PM | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS A CALL BACK FOLLOWED BEFORE MAPPING A NEW VILLAGE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS A CALLBACK | 6 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS A CALLBACK BUT WAS GOOD. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS A CALLBACK WHICH HAD BEEN LOCKED EARLIER DURING THE DAY | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED BETWEEN 12:33 TO 13:22 | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED LATE IN THE EVENING. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED ON A PAPER QUESTIONAIRRE DUE TO SECURITY. TIME WAS FROM 16:13 TO 16:58 | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED ON THE DAY THE INTERVIEWER WAS SUPPOSED TO INTERVIEW MALES OF BETWEEN 25-49 BECAUSE THE PREVIOUS DAY IT HAD BEEN LOCKED BUT NOW WAS AVAILABLE. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED USING PAPER QUESTIONNAIRE FROM 10:20AM TO 11:04AM | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE LATE IN THE EVENING AS CHASED CALLBACK | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE LATE IN THE EVENING BECAUSE THAT'S THE TIME THE RESPONDENT WAS AVAILABLE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE LATE IN THE EVENING BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT AVAILBLE EARLIER DURING THE DAY. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE ON 30TH IN THE EVENING IN THE QUESTIONNAIRE. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 22 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND IT WAS A CALLBACK | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS ALWAYS READ TO RESPOND TO THE QUESTIONS. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD BECAUSE THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY PARTICIPATIVE. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD EVEN THOUGH THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT INFORMED AS SUCH WITH MATTERS OF HIV/AIDS | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD. | 3 | ||
THE ITERVIEW WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
THE NETBOOK WENT OFF,DID INTERVIEW ON PAPER. | 1 | ||
THE NTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
THE NTERVIEW WAS VERY INTERACTIVE AS SHE HAD GOOD QUESTIONS POSED. | 1 | ||
THE RESONDENT WAS JUST SO NEGATIVE ABOUT HIV TESTING IN GENERAL | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT BECAME BORED AND WAS NOT READY AGAIN TO ANSWER MORE QUESTIONS AFTER THE DEMONSTRATION OF SELF TESTING BUT I WAS ABLE TO CONVINCE HIM THOUGH HE WAS NOT A BAD RESPONDENT. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT CONCETRATION WAS BEING INTERFERED BY HER CHILD WHO WAS STUBBORN | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT IS HIV POSITIVE AND HAS NEVER ENGAUGE IN SEXUAL ACTIVITY. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT IS A MAN FROM WESTERN KENYA TAKING CARE OF ANOTHER MAN'S HOUSE. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT IS A PASTOR WHO HAS WORKED WITH AN NGO IN HIV/AIDS PROGRAM. (The respondent said he was last tested when he wanted to donate blod- not in the list) | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT LOOKED QUITE INFORMED | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT NOTED THAT SENSITIZATION IS REQUIRED FOR PEOPLE TO BELIEVE IN THIS TOOL. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SAID IS CURRENTLY MARRIED BUT I REALISED SHE WAS SEPARATED BUT DID NOT WANT TO ADMIT.SHE REALY INSISTED TO GET THE KIT FOR THE TEST AT THAT MOMENT | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SCHOOLS IN BRITISH CURRICULUM AND SHE IS IN LEVEL 10. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SEEMED NOT WELL EQUIPED WIH MATTERS PARTAINING HIV/AIDS. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT STOPPED THE INTERVIEW BECAUSE HE WAS NOT WILLING TO DISCLOSE SOME DETAILS LIKE DATE OF BIRTH | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SUGGESTED THAT QUESTION 106 SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE QUESTIONNAIRE | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS A CALLBACK WHO HAD NOT BEEN AVAILABLE EARLIER DURING THE DAY. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS AVAILABLE LATE IN THE EVENING | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN SOME UNSWERS NOT CONSISTENT AND BASED MOST OF HIS RESPONSES ON HIS EXPERIENCE FROM HIV/AIDS CLUB IN SCHOOL. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN THE FARM SO HE COULD NOT GO BACK TO THE HOUSE TO CHECK HIS DATE OF BIRTH IN THE NATIONAL ID | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT VERY FREE WHEN AFTER A SECURITY MAN CAME AND ASKED ME TO LEAVE THE COURT IMMEDIATELLY. i THOUGH MANAGED TO CONVINCE HIM TO COME WITH ME AND FINISH THE INTERVIEW OUTSIDE THE GATE OF THE COURT. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE ACCOMMODATIVE. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS REQUIRED TO BE TESTED BY THE DOCTOR AS SHE WAS SICK AND ADMITTED . INICIALLY SHE WAS A REFUSAL BUT AFTER DAY SHE RESPONDENT .I DID THE INTERVIEW BETWEEN 6.03PM - 7.05PM BUT KEYED IN LAITER. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS SO MUCH IN A HURRY AND KEPT REMINDING ME TO WIND UP BECAUSE HE WAS TO LEAVE WITH FAMILY TO VISIT A RELATIVE IN HOSPITAL. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE BUT WAS NOT WELL INFORMED ABOUT HIV | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS WELL INFORMED BECAUSE HE IS A COMMUNITY HEALTH WORKER. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT'S HOUSE SURROUNDING LOOKED VERY INSECURE HENCE THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE USING THE PAPER QUESTIONNAIRE AND LATER TRANSFERRED TO THE NETBOOK. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT'S PARENT'S CONSENT COULD NOT BE OBTAINED BECAUSE HE/SHE WERE NOT AROUND AND THE RESPONDENT WAS COMFORTABLE IN PARTICIPATING. | 1 | ||
THERE WAS ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM HER CHILDERN. | 1 | ||
THIS QUESTIONAIRE WAS DONE DURING THE DAY ON A PAPER QUESTIONAIRE THEN TRANSFERED TO NETBOOK BECAUSE THE NETBOOK HAD NO ENOUGH CHARGE | 2 | ||
THIS QUESTIONAIRE WAS DONE ON 17/09/2013 NOT 18/09/2013 ,I ACCIDENTALLY FORGOT TO OPEN THE SAVE BAR AT THE SAME DAY.SO THE START TIME IS AS IT SHOWS IN THE HH CHARACTERISTIC PAGE 13:53. | 1 | ||
THIS QUETIONAIRE WAS DONE ON 29/08/2013 AND THE NETBOOK WENT OUT OF CHARGE BEFORE SAVING THE COVER PAGE SO I REALISED LATER ON 02/09/2013 AND SAVED IT WHICH COLLIDED WITH START TIME FOR QUETIONAIRE 30O10DT0120. | 1 | ||
THIS WAS A CALL BACK FIRST VISIT WAS ON SATARDAY AT 1PM | 1 | ||
THIS WAS A CALL BACK FROM E.A 13 THE FIRST VISIT WAS SATARDAY 17TH AT 2PM | 1 | ||
THIS WAS A CALLBACK | 1 | ||
THIS WAS A CALLBACK WHERE THE RESPONDENT AD NOT BEEN AVAILABLE | 1 | ||
THS WAS DONE IN A PAPER BETWEEN 11:13AM TO 12:02PM | 1 | ||
THe interview went well with some interruption from children playing in and outside the house | 1 | ||
TYPED QUESTIONNAIRE INTO NETBOOK LATER -SECURITY REASONS | 1 | ||
The interview was a success rushed as the respondent had another appointment | 1 | ||
The interview was conducted late in the evening because the door had been locked during the day. | 1 | ||
The interview was done as a paper questionnaire then transferred into the computer | 1 | ||
The interview was done in paper questionnaire and input later due to power failure in the field | 1 | ||
The interview was done on paper and transferred to the computer later. | 1 | ||
The interview went on well | 1 | ||
The interview went well | 1 | ||
The interview went well despite the presence of 3 children who interrupted the interview for a bit. Respondent asked for a free testing kit or if she could be tested at home | 1 | ||
The interview went well with a brief interruption, but the respondent caught up with the questions | 1 | ||
The interview went well with no interruptions | 1 | ||
The interview went well without any issues | 1 | ||
The interview went well, the respondent was interested in learning about the testing kit; she actively participated in the demonstration. The respondent does not recall the day and month of birth but only the year of birth | 1 | ||
The interview went well. | 1 | ||
The netbook fails (was not possible to select option in the questions) and used questionnaire. | 1 | ||
The responded lives with the parent who are staying in a different structure. This is actually their sleeping room. The Start time should be from 12:38 and end time 13:12. I had a problem with recording this in the field | 1 | ||
The respondent could not recall the date and month of birth, only year of birth. The respondent was interested in the kit but was also reluctant to answer the question. There was a bried interruption when her husband walked in for lunch, but le | 1 | ||
The respondent happened t be a participant in the FGD | 1 | ||
The respondent has rented other rooms for his children and also a store in the same compond. | 1 | ||
The respondent understood the Oral HIV Self Test kit but did not understand the questions on tab 20 (513&515) | 1 | ||
The respondent understood the use of the kit but did not understand question 513-515 | 1 | ||
The start time should 10:37 and stop time 11:35 | 1 | ||
There was a lot of interruption, the respondent owns a shop | 1 | ||
Transferred data from written questionairre thus field start time was 10.00 am and finish time was 10.30 am | 1 | ||
Transferred from paper questionnaire due to security issues | 1 | ||
VERY COOPARETIVE RESPONDENT. | 1 | ||
VERY HONEST AND STRAIGHT RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
WAS IN THE GRAZING FIELD HENCE HE COULD NOT GO BACK HOME TO CHECK ON THE DATE AND MONTH OF BIRTH | 1 | ||
WAS RESPONDING WELL BEFORE THE DEMONSTRATION BUT LOST CONCENTRATION FROM THE FIRST QUESTION AFTER DEMONSTRATION | 1 | ||
WE HAD ALOT OF INTERUPTION FROM HER CYING CHILD BUT WE MANAGED THE SITUATION. | 1 | ||
WE HAD SOME INTERFERENCE AS THE RESPONDENT CHILD WAS CRYING AFFECTING THE MOTHERS CONCETRATION BUT WE MANAGED TO CONTROL THE SITUATION. | 1 | ||
Worked on the paper questionairre first then transferred start time 12.05pm finish time 12.30 pm | 1 | ||
completed. the time should read from 13:14pm to 14:10pm | 1 | ||
done in a questionnaire | 1 | ||
done on paper questionnaire | 1 | ||
good | 2 | ||
good interiew | 1 | ||
good interview | 2 | ||
good respondent | 1 | ||
interview done on hardcopy | 1 | ||
interview done on paper questionnaire | 1 | ||
none | 12 | ||
ok although questioned confidentiality and asking date of birth | 1 | ||
paused the interview halfway and had call back in the afternoon. | 1 | ||
the dss number on the door sampled is on of the rooms but he has rented two houses but leaves in the other one. | 1 | ||
the intervew was good. | 1 | ||
the interview did not have any challenge. | 1 | ||
the interview was a callback that was to be done on 16th/08/2013 but the eligible respondent was not around that day. | 1 | ||
the interview was conducted late in the evening because the respondent was not around during the day and had locked the door. | 1 | ||
the interview was difficult since the repondent had a negative attitude towards HIV and at one point said he doesn't like talking about HIV. | 1 | ||
the interview was good | 6 | ||
the interview was good. | 2 | ||
the interview was ok | 1 | ||
the interviewer was very co-operative | 1 | ||
the interviiew was a call back that had not been done on 16/08/2013 because the respondent was not available. | 1 | ||
the respondent claimed that he has never been tested for HIV because he dislikes being tested by someone else and thus would be glad to get opportunity to self-test. | 1 | ||
the respondent seemed not to be very intereted as such. | 1 | ||
the respondent was busy but opted to co-operate | 1 | ||
the respondent was not well equiped with HIV topic but was very eager to participate in the research. | 1 | ||
the respondent was very co-operative | 1 | ||
the respondent was very co-operative. | 2 | ||
the respondent was very keen when respondent to questions. | 1 | ||
the respondent was very participative | 1 | ||
the respondent was very willing to answer all the questions and very fast. | 1 | ||
the time should read from 11:54 to 12:47pm | 1 | ||
under 18 years, but married | 1 | ||
very good respondent | 1 |