Login
Login

APHRC Online Microdata Library
  • Home
  • About APHRC
  • Datasets
  • Collections
  • Citations
  • Resources
  • How to use it?
  • Why sharing data?
  • Contact us
    Home / Central Data Catalog / HUMAN_DEVELOPMENT / DDI-KEN-APHRC-TPD-2024-V1.0
Human_Development

Modelling a practicum-based teacher professional development program in South Africa and moving it to scale, TPD

South Africa, 2024
Human Development (HD)
Dr Moses Ngware
Last modified June 13, 2025 Page views 742 Metadata DDI/XML JSON
  • Study description
  • Documentation
  • Data Description
  • Get Microdata
  • Identification
  • Version
  • Coverage
  • Producers and sponsors
  • Sampling
  • Data Collection
  • Data Processing
  • Data Appraisal
  • Data access
  • Disclaimer and copyrights
  • Metadata production

Identification

IDNO
DDI-KEN-APHRC-TPD-2024-V1.0
Title
Modelling a practicum-based teacher professional development program in South Africa and moving it to scale, TPD
Subtitle
TPD
Country
Name Country code
South Africa RSA
Abstract
Abstract
Background: Effective pedagogical practices make students learn better and create the right learning environment inside classrooms. While the current preservice and in-service Teacher Professional Development (TPD) programs have immensely contributed to the education systems in Africa through a steady though inadequate supply of trained teachers, stakeholders have raised concerns about quality of teacher training and teaching.
Aim: The aim of this research is to identify and model the successful aspects of an effective school-based practicum for TPD program, encompassing its development, implementation, impact on instructional decision-making within the classroom, individual behaviour influences, strategies for uptake and scaling, key challenges, and teacher perspectives. The following research questions will be addressed:
1. What aspects of the school-based practicum for TPD program have the potential to enhance best teaching practices especially for Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN), and what factors contribute to their effectiveness?
2. How can the school-based practicum for TPD support broader educational reforms such as implementing a new curriculum, scaling evidence-based teaching approaches of Foundational Literacy and Numeracy (FLN), or generating data for classroom-based decision making?
Methods: We will use a cross-sectional survey design to collect primary data that will contribute to understanding of teachers' and key education stakeholders' perspectives on school-based practicum for TPD, and especially broader educational reforms such as implementing a new curriculum, scaling evidence-based teaching approaches of FLN, and/or generating data for classroom-based decision making. The study will be conducted in one sub-Saharan African country. Three countries (Ghana, South Africa or Zimbabwe) were considered as informed by a literature review conducted by our team (APHRC). After stakeholder consultation, North-West University (NWU) in South Africa was chosen as the site for the study. A primary consideration in making this choice is the fact that NWU has a well-developing teaching practice component as part of its Bachelor of Education (BEd) degree.
The study will be focusing on student teachers training to teach in early primary school grades (grade 2-3), and exposed to successful school-based practicum for TPD. We shall select 90 student teachers (for classroom observations as well as to respond to a survey). Another 150 early grade student teachers will be selected for the survey only. In total we shall target 240 student teachers. A mixed method will be adopted, producing both qualitative and quantitative data. Moreover, 15 education stakeholders (e.g. mentors, supervisors, curriculum support officers, curriculum developers, university faculty that train teachers, principals/academic deans of education departments, etc.) will be selected to elicit qualitative data using Key Informant Interviews (KIIs). The qualitative data will undergo thematic analysis while the quantitative data will be analysed using descriptive statistics.
Results: The study is expected to yield comprehensive insights into effective school-based practicum strategies for TPD and their impact. It will shed light on successful elements of school-based practicum that contribute to effective FLN programs in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, the study will offer an in-depth understanding of how TPD initiatives can align with and bolster broader education reforms. It will emphasize evidence-based approaches, drawing attention to the specific aspects of successful practicum-based TPD.

Version

Version Date
2025-05-14
Version Notes
N/A

Coverage

Geographic Coverage
National covering all campuses of North-West University (NWU) South africa
Unit of Analysis
Student teachers, school-based mentors, school coordinators, and NWU faculty involved in teaching and practicum supervision.
Universe
Student teachers enrolled in the B.Ed Foundation Phase program at North-West University (NWU) across all campuses and learning modes (on-site and distance), along with school mentors, school coordinators at partner schools, and relevant NWU faculty.

Producers and sponsors

Authoring entity/Primary investigators
Agency Name Affiliation
Dr Moses Ngware African Population and Health Research Center
Producers
Name Affiliation Role
Dr Amani Karisa African Population and Health Research Center Co-Investigator
Dr Lydia Namatende-Sakwa African Population and Health Research Center Co-Investigator
Dr Nick Taylor JET Education Services Promoter
Funding Agency/Sponsor
Name
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Other Identifications/Acknowledgments
Name Affiliation Role
Mambe Shem African Population and Health Research Center Data documentation officer
Bonface Ingumba African Population and Health Research Center Data Governance Officer

Sampling

Sampling Procedure
Three countries (Ghana, South Africa or Zimbabwe) were shortlisted based on a literature synthesis, conducted by our team, which established that they have ongoing large-scale school-based practicum for TPD and/or have recently implemented teacher education reforms that have great potential for scale up in various contexts. We consulted with stakeholders and chose South Africa. Ghana was not selected because T-TEL, the Transforming Teacher Education and Learning organization, is currently conducting a similar study. The study focuses on improving the quality of teacher education in Ghana, aiming to enhance teacher training programs, support professional development for teachers, and contribute to overall improvements in the education system. The choice between Zimbabwe and South Africa was based on logistical considerations and the stakeholders' prior work in these countries. APHRC, the implementing organisation, has established networks and ongoing projects in South Africa, and the current project will benefit from leveraging these relationships.
Specifically, in South Africa, the study will be conducted in the North-West province. The study sites selected are the Potchefstroom and Mafikeng campuses of the North-West University (NWU). The Potchefstroom campus, which historically served privileged students (formerly a white-only university during apartheid), is in an urban area and is relatively well-resourced. On the other hand, the Mafikeng campus, formerly a black-only university during apartheid, is situated in a rural environment and is relatively less resourced compared to the former. Both campuses have large-scale preservice TPD programs that include the practicum component and now serve a range of students, both racially and in terms of socio-economic background. In addition to providing multiple contact sites, NWU also offers a distance learning program. The course content of the Bachelor of Education (BEd) program is similar across the different campuses served by the university, as well the distance learning mode of delivery. However, the three groups of students located in the Potchefstroom campus, the Mafikeng campus and the distance learning mode offer opportunities for differences of program implementation that could potentially imply differences in quality of TPD practicum which render them interesting from a research perspective.
While efforts are made to choose institutions that represent the historical and socio-economic landscape of South Africa, the selection of these sites is also based on the need to select a few cases in order to conduct in-depth research, rather than obtaining a representative sample of the entire country (Stake, 1995). The selection of the study sites followed extensive consultations with the Department of Higher Education and Technology and the Department of Basic Education in South Africa, as well as researchers with experience in practicum-based preservice TPD programs in the country. The researchers' prior knowledge of the practicum-based TPD programs at NWU, and their previous relationships and work in this institution, were also key in the selection of these programs.
The data will be collected from student teachers and key TPD stakeholders such as teacher educators, school-based mentors, principals of schools where student teachers undertake the practicum, supervisors, university faculty that train teachers, principals/academic deans of teacher training departments, curriculum support officers, and curriculum developers. Since the focus of the study is FLN, the student teacher sample will be drawn from those destined to teach in early primary school grades (grade 2-3) and are currently exposed to school-based practicum for TPD offered by NWU. These students are currently enrolled in the Bachelor of Education (Foundation Phase), where they are being trained to teach Languages, Mathematics and Life Skills. Sudman (1976) recommends that for each major group or subgroup in the sample, it is advisable to have at least 100 elements. For minor subgroups, a sample size ranging from 20 to 50 elements is considered adequate. Based on this suggestion, we shall select 30 teachers from each of the three 'sites of delivery': Potchefstroom campus, Mafikeng campus and the distance learning program. Data collection will consist of classroom observations (a total of 90 student teachers) as well as participation in a survey. Another 150 early grade student teachers who went through the practicum program will be selected for the survey only. In total we shall target 240 primary grades 2 and 3 student teachers. A sample size of 240 is considered to be sufficient to address our research questions, especially as we will use descriptive statistics to analyse the data (Israel, 1992) (see section 4.6. on data management and analysis).

At least 15 key TPD stakeholders (five per site of delivery) will be selected to collect qualitative data using Key Informant Interviews (KIIs). These will include teacher educators, school-based mentors, principals of schools where student teachers undertake the practicum, supervisors, university faculty that train student teachers, principals/academic deans of teacher training departments, curriculum support officers, and curriculum developers.

4.2.1. How the sample of participants will be identified and recruited
Prospective participants will be identified based on their status as student teachers in their final year of teacher training, particularly those undergoing or about to undergo practicums in early primary school grades (grade 2-3) at Potchefstroom and Mafikeng campuses of NWU.

The research team will initially contact prospective participants through official channels recognised by NWU. In consultation with the centralised Teaching Practicum (Work Integrated Learning) office at NWU, the research team will send emails to student teachers inviting them to participate in the study. Interested student teachers will be asked to indicate their interest by responding to the email within a specified time frame. Subsequently, the research team will follow up with the positive responses from student teachers to provide further information and instructions regarding their potential participation in the study. We will use follow-ups emails for polite reminders until we attain a positive response rate of over 80%.

The 15 key TPD stakeholders will be identified purposefully, in consultation with the School of Education at NWU and other TPD stakeholders. In case a stakeholder position has more than one representative, gender considerations will be observed to enhance diversity and inclusivity. Identified stakeholders will be approached by the research team in their offices during official working hours to be invited to take part in the study. Identified stakeholders will be approached by the research team in their offices during official working hours to be invited to take part in the study. Those who show interest will be provided with further information and instructions regarding their potential participation in the study.
Deviations from the Sample Design
Recruitment challenges existed for the distance learning program
Limited engagement from the Vanderbijlpark campus despite outreach efforts
Most participants came from the Potchefstroom and Mafikeng campuses
Response Rate
267 student teachers participated (216 in the quantitative survey and 51 in in-depth interviews), representing an overall response rate of 90%.
Weighting
No weighting was applied to the data.

Data Collection

Dates of Data Collection (YYYY/MM/DD)
Start date End date
2024-10-01 2024-10-14
Mode of data collection
Face-to-face [f2f]
Supervision
SUPERVISION DURING DATA COLLECTION
Supervision during the data collection phase of the study was structured across multiple levels to ensure data quality, ethical compliance, and consistency in the application of research tools. The approach combined both preparatory oversight through a pilot study and ongoing supervision throughout actual data collection.
Pilot Phase Supervision
Before the commencement of full-scale data collection, a pilot study was conducted with nine participants for the student teacher survey and four in-depth interviews at Northwest University, Potchefstroom campus. This phase served as a critical supervisory checkpoint to refine research tools and plan for rigorous implementation. The research team directly supervised this phase, overseeing the administration of instruments, collecting feedback, and identifying technical and methodological improvements. Due to geographical limitations, key informant interviews and mentor interview guides were not piloted.
Following supervisory review of the pilot, several modifications were made to improve study tools, data quality and functionality, including Integration of photo capture of consent forms, adjustments to tools logic and terminology to suit the context (e.g., replacing “supervisor” with “lecturer”) and technical enhancements for digital data capture and storage, such as the use of cloud storage for audio files. These changes were documented and communicated to the field interviewers during preparatory sessions.
Supervision During Actual Data Collection
During the full data collection phase, a hybrid supervision model was applied to match the hybrid data collection strategy (physical and online methods). Key components of the supervisory process included:
1.Field based supervision
Field-based supervision was conducted at two distinct levels: by team leaders selected from among the field interviewers, and by the central coordination team from APHRC. This dual-level supervisory structure was designed to ensure rigorous quality control, provide timely support, and uphold ethical standards throughout the data collection process.
·Spot checks were carried out by APHRC researchers to assess the proper administration of both survey instruments and in-depth interviews. These checks involved direct observation of field procedures to verify compliance with data collection protocols.
·Team leaders conducted site visits to observe field interviewers in practice, verify the identity of respondents, confirm that informed consent procedures were followed, and offer immediate corrective feedback where necessary.
·These supervisory activities helped ensure adherence to ethical guidelines, promoted consistency in the use of revised tools, and reinforced the reliability and integrity of the data collected.
2. Remote Supervision
·For online data collection, supervision involved monitoring participation rates, providing technical support, and ensuring the integrity of digital survey submissions.
3. Communication and Support
·Ongoing communication channels were maintained between field teams and the central research coordination team to address challenges promptly.
·Lecturers were engaged to promote participation and act as gatekeepers for accessing student teacher cohorts, further reinforcing supervisory oversight.
Type of Research Instrument
STUDY TOOLS DESCRIPTION
The team planned classroom lesson observations and prepared the necessary tools. However, delayed ethical approval from Northwest University (NWU), South Africa, prevented them from conducting observations during the August 2024 practicum period. The team proceeded to collect data using the following tools:
1. Student Teacher Survey Questionnaire: The survey targeted foundation phase student teachers (Years 1-4) during their teaching practicum in Grades R-3, specifically designed to elicit their views on the effective features of a practicum.
2. Key Informant Interview Guide: This assessment tool collected data from key practicum stakeholders (NWU TPD program leader, mathematics and literacy lecturers, work-integrated learning office staff, and school-based coordinators) to identify successful practicum elements and determine how the program could better support broader educational reform initiatives.
3. Interview Guide for Mentors: This instrument gathered perspectives from school-based mentor teachers who directly supported student teachers during their practicum placements, focusing on identifying effective practicum components and exploring how the program could be leveraged to advance wider educational reform objectives.
4. Interview Guide for Student teachers This tool specifically targeted third and fourth-year student teachers to gather their insights on effective practicum elements and potential connections to educational reforms. First and second-year students were excluded from interviews based on pilot study findings indicating their limited practicum experience, though they participated in the survey component instead.

Data Processing

Cleaning Operations
DATA PROCESSING
The data processing phase was led by a consultant who developed a report framework based on the study's research questions. Transcribed qualitative data was reviewed to identify key data points within each instrument, guided by this framework. The team then developed thematic narratives from the transcripts, aligning them with the core areas outlined in the framework. These narratives provided rich contextual insights and were used directly to populate the report, preserving the authenticity of participants' voices.
Other Processing
N/A

Data Appraisal

Estimates of Sampling Error
N/A

Data access

Contact
Name Email URI
African Population and Health Research Center datarequests@aphrc.org/info@aphrc.org aphrc.org
Conditions
APHRC data access condition

All non-APHRC staff seeking to use data generated at the Center must obtain written approval to use the data from the Director of Research.
This form is developed to assess applications for data use and facilitate responsible sharing of data with external partners/collaborators/researchers. By entering into this agreement, the undersigned agrees to use these data only for the purpose for which they were obtained and to abide by the conditions outlined below:

1.Data Ownership:
The data remain the property of APHRC; any unauthorized reproduction and sharing of the data is strictly prohibited. The user will, therefore, not release nor permit others to use or release the data to any other person without the written authorization from the Center.

2.Purpose:
The provided data must be used for the purpose specified in the Data Request Form; any other use not specified in the form must receive additional or separate authorization.

3.Respondent Identifiers:
The Center is committed to protecting the identity of the respondents who provide information in its research. All analytical data sets (both qualitative and quantitative) released by the Data Unit MUST are stripped of respondent identifiers to protect the identity of the respondents. By accepting to use APHRC data, the user is pledging that he/she will not, under any circumstance, regenerate the identifiers or permit others to use the data to learn the identity of any individual, household or community included in any data set.

4.Confidentiality pledge:
The user will not use nor permit others to use the data to report any information in the data sets that could identify, directly or by inference, individuals or households.

5.Reporting of errors or inconsistencies:
The user will promptly notify the Head of the Statistics and Survey Unit any errors discovered in the data as soon as the errors are discovered.

6.Publications resulting from APHRC data:
The Center requires external collaborators to work with APHRC staff on all publications resulting from its data. In order to facilitate this, lead authors should send a detailed concept note of the paper (including the background, rationale, data, analytical methods, and preliminary findings) to the Principle Investigator (or Theme Leader) for the project (with a copy to the Director of Research), who will circulate the abstract to concerned researchers for possible expression of interest in participating in the publication as co-authors. Any exception to the involvement of APHRC staff should be approved by the Director of Research, APHRC.

7.Security:
The user will take responsibility for the security of the data by ensuring that the data are used and stored in a secure environment where access is password protected. This will ensure that non-authorized people should not have access to the data.

8.Loss of privilege to use data:
In the event that APHRC determines that the data user is in violation of the conditions for using the data, or if the user wishes to cancel this agreement, the user will destroy the data files provided to him/her. APHRC retains the right to revoke this agreement or informs publishers to withhold publication of any work based wholly or in part on its data if the conditions for using the data are violated.

9.Acknowledgement:
Any work/reports from this data must acknowledge APHRC as the source of these data. For example, the suggested acknowledgement for NUHDSS data is:
"This research uses livelihoods data collected under the longitudinal Nairobi Urban Health and Demographic Surveillance System (NUHDSS) since 2006. The NUHDSS is carried out by the African Population and Health Research Center in two slums settlements (Korogocho and Viwandani) in Nairobi City."Additionally all funders, the study communities that provided the data, and staff who collected and analyzed or processed the data should be acknowledged.

10.Deposit of Reports/Papers:
The user should submit electronic and paper copies of all publications generated using APHRC data to the Policy Engagement and Communications Department, with copies to the Director of Research.

11.Change of contact details:
The user will promptly inform the Director of Research of any change in your personal details as contained on this data request form.
Citation requirement
Use of the dataset must be acknowledged using a citation which would include:
- the Identification of the Primary Investigator
- the title of the survey (including country, acronym and year of implementation)
- the survey reference number
- the source and date of download

Disclaimer and copyrights

Disclaimer
The user of the data acknowledges that the original collector of the data, the authorized distributor of the data, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for use of the data or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses.
Copyright
Copyright © APHRC, 2025

Metadata production

Document ID
DDI-KEN-APHRC-TPD-2024-V1.0
Producers
Name Abbreviation Role
African Population and Health Research Center APHRC DDI Documentation
Date of Production
2025-05-14
Document version
Version 1.0(May 2025)
APHRC Microdata Portal

© APHRC Microdata Portal, All Rights Reserved. Slot Online