Value |
Category |
A PARTNERSHIP IS WELCOME AS LONG AS IT PROVIDE THE ACTUAL SUPPORT OF SYSTEMS IT CLAIMS |
|
A VERY GOOD IDEAL BECAUSE AT THE END OF THE DAY THE COMMUNITY WILL BENEFIT |
|
BENEFICIALLY BOTH PARENTS,THE RESPONDNT MEANT IT IS ONLY THE GOVERMENT AND PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER BENEFIT FULLY |
|
BETTER RESULTS WILL BE OBTAINED AS A RESULT OF THE PARTNERSHIP |
|
DISADVANTAGEOUS- : TO THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE GOVERNMENT IS KNOWN TO DELAY SERVICES/ EQUIPMENT AND SUPPORT, GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION SERVICES DO NOT REACH THE INTENDED PEOPLE |
|
FEELS THAT IT'S HIGH TIME AN ACTION IS TAKEN TO IMPROVE HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE SLUMS |
|
FINE - THERE ARE ALOT OF TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES WHEN THERE IS SUCH A COLLABORATION IN FORM OF SEMINARS, WORKSHOPS |
|
GEVERNMENT NEEDS TO DO MORE, THOUGH IT IS TRYING IN THE SECTOR OF SUPPLYING ARVS |
|
GOOD |
|
GOOD - : BECAUSE WE WILL GIVE THE GOVERMENT. THE INFORMATION ON WHAT HAPPENS ON THE GROUND EG ISSUES ON ENVIRONMENT, SANITATION AND WATER AND VICEVERSA |
|
GOOD - : THE COMMUNITY WILL GET MORE COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES |
|
GOOD - : WILL STRENGTHEN THE SERVICES WE ARE OFFERING TO THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE WE ARE CLOSE TO THE PEOPLE AND THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT IN TOUCH WITH PEOPLE ON THE GRASSROOTS |
|
GOOD - BECAUSE THERE WILL BE NO LAXITY WHEN SUCH A PARTNERSHIP IS CREATED, PRIVATE PARTNERS WILL HELP GOVERNMENT TO TRAIN MORE HEALTH PROVIDERS TO FIGHT SHORTAGE OF STAFF, THERE WILL BE ACCOUNTABILITY IN THE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE OF PRESENCE FROM |
|
GOOD - BETTER AND STRONGER SERVICES WILL BE OFFERED TO THE COMMUNITY EG THE PRIVATE ORGANISATIONS CAN PROVIDE US WITH MORE MONEY TO CREATE SPACE FOR PRIIVATE SERVICES EG BUSINESS. |
|
GOOD - GOEVERNMENT WILL PROVIDE THE LACKING EQUIPMENT IN PRIVATE FACILITIES, SO SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY WILL BE MORE EFFICIENT |
|
GOOD - GOVERNMENT PROVIDES DRUGS AND SERVICES THROUGH US BECAUSE WE ARE CLOSE TO THE POOR PEOPLE AND THAT STRENGTHENS HEALTH PROVISION TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
GOOD - IMPROVED SERVICES TO THE PEOPLE AND UNIFORMITY OF SERVICES I.E, WHATEVER SERVICES ARE OFFERED IN THE PRIVATE FACILITIES, THEY ARE THE SAME IN PUBLIC FACILITIES |
|
GOOD - THAT RELATIONSHIP BRINGS SERVICES CLOSE TO THE PEOPLE |
|
GOOD - THAT RELATIONSHIP WILL STRENGTHEN THE SERVICES OFFERED TO THE COMMUNITY. THAT KIND OF RELATIONSHIP WILL CREATE JOB OPPORTUNITIES FOR HEALTH WORKERS |
|
GOOD - THE PARTNERSHIP WOULD BRING GOOD WORKING RELATION BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FACILITY |
|
GOOD -: WILL OFFER BETTER SERVICES AND MORE EFFICIENT SERVICES TO THE PEOPLE |
|
GOOD BECAUSE THE COMMUNITY EMBERS TRUST PRIVATE FACILITIES FOR BETTER MEDICAL SERVICES THAN GOVERNMENT.SO IT WILL IMPROVE THE TRUST OF COMMUNITY TO THE GIVERNMENT /PUBLIC FACILITIES. |
|
GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL SUPPORT THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER WITH MATERIAL AND EQUIPMENTTO BE USED TO OFFER THE SERVICE. |
|
GOOD BECAUSE- THERE WILL BE AVAILABILITY OF MORE AND EFFECTIVE DRUGS WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE ACCESS TO FROM THE GOVERNMENT .IMPORTANT PERSONALITIES WILL VISIT OUR CLINIC WHICH WILL RAISE THE STANDARDS OF OUR CLINIC |
|
GOOD BECAUSE:-SERVICES WILL BE BROUGHT CLOSE TO PEOPLE, :- WITH GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT SECURITY WILL / CAN IMPROVE |
|
GOOD IDEA |
|
GOOD INITIATIVE AND NEED EXTRA MONITORING ESPECIALLY SLUM AREAS |
|
GOOD INITIATIVE BUT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD ISSUE MORE DRUGS TO LOCAL HEALTH FACILITIES SO THAT COMMUNITY COULD GET BETTER SERVICES |
|
GOOD PERTNERSHIP BECAUSE GORVENMENT ASSIST THE PRIVATE AND VICE VASA. |
|
GOOD SINCE IT HELPS IN CREATING AWARENESS AND ALSO HOSPITALITY |
|
GOOD,BUT THE GOVERNMENT NEED TO SUPPLY ALOT AND ENOUGH DRUGS TO PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
GOOD- BECAUSE IT WILL PUT TO ALL QUACKS. SERVICES WILL BE BROUGHT CLOSE TO THE PEOPLE |
|
GOOD. GOVERNMENT GIVES FAMILY PLANNING AND IMMUNISATION EQUIPMENT |
|
GOOD. IT HELPS THE COMMUNITY |
|
GOOD. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD EMPLOY MORE HEALTH PERONNEL AND PROVIDE VITAL MEDICINES IN THE SLUMS. IN ADDITION, THE EXISTING HEALTH FACILITIES SHOULD BE UPGRADED AND MORE EQUIPMENT PROVIDED |
|
GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE AND SUBSIDIES OF KITS AND EQUIPMENT (TESTING-LABORATORY KITS) |
|
GOVERNMENT IS ABLE TO PROVIDE DRUGS TO PRIVATE FACILITIES THAT DO NOT HAVE ADEQUATE DRUG SUPPLY |
|
GOVERNMENT IS HELPING WHEN IT COMES TO SUPPLY OF ARVS TO THE AFFECTED(INFECTED VICTIMS) |
|
GOVERNMENT POLICIES THAT WOULD BEST BE MET BY LIASING WITH PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS WHO HAVE A GRASSROOT PENETRATION |
|
GOVERNMENT SHOULD GIVE INCENTIVES TO PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS IN SLUMS |
|
HIS OPINION IS FOR THE PARTNERSHIP BECAUSE THEY WILL BENEFIT |
|
I DO RECOMMEND WHILE PATNERING MORE SERVICES TO BOTH COMMUNITY AND CARE GIVERS WILL BENEFIT ,EFFICIENT CARE AND SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY,TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES TO THE SERVICE PROVIDERS,EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES. |
|
I DON'T RECOMMEND. THE IDEA IS GOOD BUT THERE IS A LOOP HOLE SOMEWHERE WHICH NEEDS TO BE LOOKED AT. THE LINK BETWEEN THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTOR IS NOT GOOD. NEEDS TO BE HARMONIZED |
|
I THINK ITS A GOOD IDEA TO INTEGRATE BOTH OF THEM BECAUSE WITH THE GOVERNMENT ,IT WOULD HELP IN SUPPLIES (E.G) DRUGS TO THE UPCOMING ORGANISATIONS AND ALSO THE PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS WOULD HELP TO UPDATE THE MOH ON RESEARCH FINDINGS. |
|
I THINK ITS POSITIVE,BUT THERE IS A MAJOR HINDERANCE ONE TO GOVERNMENT BUREACRACY AND RED TAPE.SMALL PRIVATE HEALTH PROVIDERS REACH OUT MORE TO THE COMMUNITY,EVEN ARES WHERE THE GOVT DOES NOT REACH. |
|
I'M BOTH IN PUBLIC SERVICE AS WELL AS A PRIVATE PRACTITIONER HENCE HAVE EXPERIENCE IN BOTH AND WOULD BE INTERESTED TO SEE HOW BOTH MERGE IN A CONSTRUCTIVE WAY. A POSITIVE MOVE INDEED. |
|
IMPORTANT - WILL IMPROVE THE SERVICES PROVIDED THROUGH TRAINING OF PERSONEL, WILL CREATE MOTIVATION TO PARTICIPATE FOR BETTER SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY, WILL PROVIDE GOOD WORKING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE PARTNERS. |
|
IS A GOOD IDEA. WE (PRIVATE) CAN HELP SAVE LIVES OF PATIENTS. REDUCE CONJESTION OF PUBLIC HOSPITALS. HELP IMPROVE THE GENERAL HEALTH OF THE COMMUNITY. |
|
IS A GOOD NETWORKING. IMPROVES STATUS OF THE AREA. SUPPORT FROM GOVERNMENT IS ESSENTIAL AND HELPS LINK THE COMMUNITY WITH HEALTH SERVICES THAT ARE MORE AFFORDABLE. |
|
IS HEALTHY-AVOIDS MISUNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE 2 SECTORS.PRIVATE SECTOR UNDERSTANDS THE PEOPLE MORE THAN THE GOVERNMENT AND HENCE THEY SHOULD NOT BE BIASED IN HEALTH PROVISION AND SHOULD INSTEAD BE IN PARTNERSHIP TO HELP PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SERVI |
|
IT CAN BE EFFECTIVE CURRENTLY FOR INSTANCE I VISIT MY HIV CLIENTS AND OTHER HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS DO THE SAME WITH DUPLICATION OF SERVICES DUE TO POOR PARTNERSHIPS,HENCE NO ONE WILL BE LEFT OUT. |
|
IT COULD BE OF BENEFIT IF THE GOVERNMENT IS COMMITTED |
|
IT ENHANCES EQUAL HEALTH CARE OPPORTUNITIES |
|
IT HAS BEEN HELPFUL TO THE COMMUNITY SO IF THEY CAN COME TO GETHER WE CAN HAVE BETTER SERVICES. |
|
IT HAS REALLY BROUGHT ALOT TO THE HEALTH CARE INSTITUTIONS ESPECIALLY IN SPOUNSOURING AND OFFERING MEDICAL EQUIPMENT |
|
IT HELPS TO STANDARDIZE THE HAELTH SERVICE DELIVERY TO THE PUBLIC.ALSO TO HARMONISE THE WORK RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BOTH ORGANZATIONS. |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA ,BECAUSE THE COMMUNITY WILL GET THE BEST HEALTH CARE SO FAR |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA AND A POSITIVE FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE COMMON MWANANCHI |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE IT CAN UPDATE ONE ON CURRENT HEALTH MATTERS |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE IT WILL IMPROVE THE SERVICES DELIVERED IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE ONE CAN ENJOY THE ABOVE BENEFITS |
|
IT IS A GOOD IDEA WHOSE TIME HAS COME |
|
IT IS A GOOD OPINION IN THAT IT WILL PROVIDE OR PROMOTE GOOD CARE TO THE COMMUNITIES WHERE THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER TRAINED ON DIFFERENT HEALTH ISSUES AND ALSO A WAY OF CONTINUOS MEDICAL EDUCATION TO THE HEALTH WORKERS. |
|
IT IS A GOOD PARTNERSHIP MAINLY DUE TO RESOURCES BEING AVAILED IN GREATER ABUNDANCE |
|
IT IS A POSITIVE PARTNERSHIP SINCE WE IN GOVERMENT CAN ACCESS BETTER EQUIPMENT VIA PRIVATE STAKEHOLDER FOR MORE ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS,SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR DRUGS,EQUIPMENT AND STUFF RENUMERATION IS IN ADEQUATE IN GOVERNMENT ,INCENTIVE FOR WORKERS ETC. |
|
IT IS AGOOD IDEA BECAUSE IT WILL IMPROVE SEVRICES IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
IT IS BECAUSE WE ARE WORKING TO HELP THE SAME PEOPLE ,SO THERE IS NO NEED OF COMPETITION |
|
IT IS BETTER BECAUSE IT WILL PROVIDE A QUALITY OUTCOME TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE IT WILL BENEFIT COMMUNITY MORE THAN WHEN IT IS ONE SIDED |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE OF IMPROVEMENT OF FACILITIES AND KNOWLEDGE.IT ALSO CREATES EMPLOYMENT. |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GORVENMENT HELPS THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS WITH HEALTH FACITIES. |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GORVENMENT MAY OFFER PROPER FACILITIES AND HELP WITH MEDICINE. |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GORVENMENT MAY HELP THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER WITH FACILITIES. |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GORVENMENT OFFERS SECURITY TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIER |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT HAVE THE SAME DEPTH AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT MAY ASSIST THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER WITH BETTER FACILITIES |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT MAY HELP THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER WITH MEDICINE AND OTHER HEALTH FACILITIES |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL SUPPORT THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER WITH EQUIPMENT AND MEDICINE |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THE PATIENT WILL HAVE BETTER DRUGS AT AFFORDABLE PRICES ,ALSO THE PATIENT WILL NOT TRAVEL LONG DISTANCES |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THERE ARE FEW GOVERNMENT FACILITIES IN THE SLUM DWELLINGS AND HENCE THE PRIVATE HEALTH PROVIDERS ARE THE ONES WHO REACH THESE PEOPLE. ITS EXPENSIVE FOR THE PEOPLE HERE TO ACCESS HEALTH CARE SO GOVERNMENT SHOULD ASSIST REGISTE |
|
IT IS GOOD BECAUSE THEY COMPLIMENT EACH OTHER |
|
IT IS GOOD COLLABORATION,NETWORKING WILL BOOST HEALTH SERVICES PROVISION AS WELL ASSISTING THE SOCIETY TO ACCESS HEALTH PROVISION SERVICES,AFFORDABILITY IN TERM OF ACCESS IS PARAMOUNT AS WELL AS EXPOSURE TO AVAILABLE TECHNOLOGY |
|
IT IS GOOD FOR THE GOVERNMENT TO PARTNER WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR AS IT AIDS IN FUNDING THEM THEM SO THAT THEY CAN REACH THE AREAS THE GOVERNMMENT DOESN'T ACCESS TO REACH |
|
IT IS GOOD IDEA BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THE GOVERNMENT REACH THE COMMUNITY IN THE SLUMS |
|
IT IS GOOD IDEA BECAUSE THE TRAINING WILL BENEFIT THE NURSES |
|
IT IS GOOD IDEA WHEREBY THE COMMUNITY IS ABLE TO GET CHEAPER SERVICES.THE GORVENMENT SHOULD CHECK UP AND IMRPOVE THE SANITATION IN SLUMS TO REDUCE THE DISEASES CAUSED BY THE UNCLEAN ENVIRONMENT. |
|
IT IS GOOD INTIATIVE BECAUSE THEY ASSIST ONE ANOTHER WHERE IF GOVERNMENT RUNS OUT OF DRUGS PRIVATE LAW ASSIST AND SUPPORT |
|
IT IS GOOD SINCE WITH GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE PARTNERS ARE ABLE TO IMPROVE SERVICES DELIVERY |
|
IT IS GOOD WITH PROPER COORDINATION BECAUSE THEY (THE GOVERNMENT) CAN GIVE PROPER MANAGEMENT |
|
IT IS GOOD,AND WILL BE MORE BETTER IF THEIR SERVICES INN THE SLUM WILL BE BOOSTED BY PARTNERINGUP WITH PHN |
|
IT IS GOOD. THE RESULTS ARE COMMENDABLE TO PRODUCTIVE DUE TO SUPPLIES OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT |
|
IT IS GOOG BECAUSE IT HELPS GORVENMENT GIVES GOOD SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
IT IS IN ORDER ,SINCE DONERS FUNDING GOES ALONG AWAY TO COMPLEMENT THE GORVENMENT AND THE GORVENMENT IN TURN KEEPSTABS ON THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO ENSURE THAT CITIZENS GET THE SERVICE. |
|
IT IS NOT GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT CAN CONTROL THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
IT IS NOT GOOD,THEY LOOK TOO MUCH INTO THE WELL BEING OF WORKERS IN PRIVATE HEALTH PROVIDERS INSTEAD OF THE SERVICES PROVIDED.THEY SHOULD ENGAGE IN BETTER RELATIONS |
|
IT IS O.K. THE PRIVATE ARE MANIPULATING AND PROFITING FROM THE PUBLIC YET THEY GET SOME MEDICINE FREE. |
|
IT IS OK.SO LONG AS THE PRIVATE SECTOR DOES NOT OVERCHARGE THE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICES |
|
IT IS POSITIVE. GOOD FOR BETTER GROWTH IN THE SOCIETY AS REGARDS HEALTH MATTERS |
|
IT IS RECOMMENDEBLE AS IT POTENTIATES PROMOTION OF COMMUNITY WELL BEIN AND HEALTH PLUS ERADICATION OF EMERGING DISEASES AND OUTBREAKS |
|
IT IS THE BEST AS THEY WORK AS ONE TEAM AND GET THE BEST RESOURCES. |
|
IT MIGHT DELIVER GOVERNMENT FROM ITS CORE PUBLIC DUTY OF HEALTH PROVISION |
|
IT PROMOTES THE FLOW BETWEEN THE TWO WHEN NEED ARISES AND MAKES IT FOR PROCURMENT |
|
IT SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED BECAUSE MORE CHALLENGES ARE UNDERGONE EASILY |
|
IT SHOULD BE FOSTERED AND ENCOURAGED BEARING IN MIND THAT WILLING STAFFING IS WIDELY AVILABLE |
|
IT WERE FAIR IF THEY COULD JOIN OR EITHER EMPLOY AS IN PRIVATE SERVICES TO WORK TOGETHER |
|
IT WILL BE GOOD FOR THE COMMUNITY WHO WILL BENEFIT A LOT |
|
IT WILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY AND ALSO SUPPORT THE HEALTH PRACTITIONERS,WILL GET FROM THE GOVERNMENT E.G THROUGH EQUIPMENTS,DRUGS |
|
IT WILL BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS BY IMPROVING LIFE AND HEALTH STANDARDS OF COMMUNITY MEMBERS. |
|
IT WILL HELP THE PRIVATE SECTOR TO REACH MANY CLIENTSAND IT WILL HELP IN TRAINING AND EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES |
|
IT WILL HELP TO IMPROVE THE HEALTH CARE FOR THE COMMUNITY. |
|
IT WILL IMPROVE SERVICES PROVIDED TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
IT WILL MAKE OUR BUSINESS LEGAL SUCH THAT THE GOVERNMENT WILL NOT HARRASS US IN ANY WAT SINCE WE ARE IN PARTNERSHIP WITH IT. |
|
IT WILLEFFECT BETTER "REACH" TO MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITYIN TERM OF NUMBER OF PEOPLE WHO WILL GAIN FROM THE SERVICES |
|
IT'S A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE OUR AIM AS HEALTH WORKERS IS TO ERADICATE ILLNESSES, THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD ALSO GET INVOLVED MORE IN PREVENTIVE MEASURES ESPECIALLY IN SLUMS |
|
IT'S BENEFICIAL TO THE HEALTH WORKER AND THE PATIENT SINCE NOT ALL CAN BE ABSORBED INTO THE GOVERNMENT BUT WHEN THE GOVERNMENT COLLABORATE WITH THE PRIVATE SECTOR THEY ALL FEEL APPRECIATED |
|
IT'S CONVENIENT IF THE GORVENMENT COULD SUPPORT PRIVATE HEALTH PROVIDERS TO ACQUIRE ESSENTIAL DRUGS |
|
IT'S FAIR FOR THEM TO APRTNER |
|
ITS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE IT CAN MAKE ONE LEARN ALOT OF THINGS THAT SHE DOESN'T KNOW |
|
ITS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE THEY HELP EACH OTHER EXPOUND ON HEALTH CARE BOTH IN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE FACILITIES |
|
ITS A GOOD THING SINCE IT HELP IN PROVIDING BETER QUALITY SERVICES |
|
ITS A GOOD THING TO IMPROVE HEALTH COME IN KENYA |
|
ITS A POSITIVE MOVE SINCE THE PARTNERSHIP WOULD PUT IN PLACE SYSTEMS THAT WOULD ERADICATE DISEASES CONCLUSIVELY WITHOUT RELAPSES |
|
ITS GOOD BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT WILL OFFER SECURITY SERVICES TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS AND ALSO ASSIST WITH MEDICINE |
|
ITS GOOD COZ IT WILL EXPLOIT THE STRENGTH OF EACH OTHER (PUBLIC-PRIVATE FACILITIES),IT WILL BENEFIT COMMUNITY MEMBERS,IT WILL HELP IN EQUIPING HEALTH FACILITIES MORE. |
|
ITS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE |
|
ITS HEALTHY SINCE WE RAE ALL STAKEHOLDERS IN RELATION TO HEALTH ISSUES,SUPPORT IN TERMS OF LOGISTICS TRAININGS FOR G.O.K HEALTH WORKERS,INVOLIVEMENT IN EMERGENCIES OF DISEASE OUTBREAKS AND DISASTERS. |
|
ITS NOT HELPING AT TIMES WHEN WE REFER PATIENTS FROM PRIVATE CLINIC THEY DON'T ATTENT TO THEM URGENTLY AS REQUIRED |
|
ITS OK AND THEY SHOULD COMPLETELY JOIN HANDS IN MANY PARTS OF KENYA TO CONTRIBUTE TOWARDS ENHANCING BETTER HEALTH CARE |
|
ITS THE BEST METHOD TO APPROACH HEALTH SERVICE DUPLICATION AND WASTAGE OF RESOURCES,IT WILL ENSURE ESSENTIAL HEALTH SERVICES ARE OFFERED TO ALL EQUALLY.THE PARTNERSHIP WILL HELP IN FUTURE PLANNING OF HEALTH SERVICE PROVISION. |
|
MORE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES NEEDED |
|
MORE GOVERNMENT SUPPORT NEEDED |
|
MORE SHOULD BE DONE IN THE RESEARCH COLLECTED OTHER THAN JUST COLLECTING INFORMATION AND DATA AND DOING NOTHING OR VERY LITTLE. |
|
MORE SUPPORT FROM THE GORVENMENT IS NEEDED BUT IS COMMENDABLE |
|
NIL |
|
NO COMMENT |
|
NO COMMENT (SHE FELT SHE DID NOT HAVE CAPACITY TO COMMENT AND ONLY THE IN CHARGE CAN) |
|
NONE |
|
NOT ABAD IDEA |
|
OURS IS AND AUTONOMOUS INSTITIUTION. WE HAVE OUR HEADQUARTERS IN WESTLANDS AND WE ONLY PROVIDE OUTPATIENT SERVICES. WE FORWARD ALL OUR DATA TO THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH AS PER THE DICTATES OF OUR CONTRACT WITH THEM |
|
PARTNERSHIP ARE BELOW PAR. MOST PRIVATE FACILITIES AND NGOS ONLY COME INTO THE SLUMS FOR FINANCIAL GAIN IE FINANCING OF THEIR OWN PROJECTS AND NOT TO ACTUALLY HELP THE NEEDY PEOPLE |
|
POSITIVE,BUT THE PRIVATE SECTOR SHOULD STRIVE TO MAKE IT AFFORDABLE FOR PEOPLE ESPECIALLY IN THE COMMUNITY SETTING TO SEEK HEALTH CARE. |
|
PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP IS BETTER BECAUSE THE GORVENMENT MAY OFFER THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS WITH MACHINES AND EQUIPMENT. |
|
RESPONDENT ARGUES THAT THE GOVERNMENT HAS NOT DONE MUCH TO ASSIST THE PRIVATE HEALTH FACILITIES IN OFFERING GOOD SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY. SHE HOPES THAT WITH PHN THINGS ARE GOING TO IMPROVE |
|
RESPONDENT FEELS THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE MORE SUPPORTIVE IN TERMS OF EQUIPMENT AND DRUGS HOWEVER SHE FEELS WITH THE CURRENT PARTNERSHIPS THINGS ARE GOING TO IMPROVE |
|
RESPONDENT HOPES THAT MAY BE THINGS WILL IMPROVE WITH PHN |
|
RESPONDENT HOPES THAT PHN WILL IMPROVE THINGS ESPECIALLY FOR SMALL HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE SLUMS |
|
RESPONDENT HOPES THAT THIS WILL ENABLE THE GOVERNMENT TO IMPROVE HEALTH CARE SERVICES |
|
RESPONDENT IS VERY OPTIMISTIC THAT THINGS WILL CHANGE WITH PARTNERSHIPS |
|
RESPONDENT THINKS IT HAS BEEN ON NO BENEFIT YET |
|
RESPONDENT THINKS THAT THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD BE MORE SERIOUS WITH HEALTH SERVICES IN THE SLUMS |
|
RESPONDENT THINKS THINGS HAVE TO MOVE FIRST AS THE POPULATION IS INCREASING THUS NEED FOR BETTER MEDICAL CARE |
|
SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY WILL BE MORE EFFICIENT AS PATIENTS WILL NOT BE REFERRED TO KENYATTA HOSPITAL FOR COMPLICATIONS AS IT IS THE CASE AT THE MOMENT |
|
SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED SINCE THE GOVERNMENT CAPACITY IS WANTING AND THE PRIVATE SECTOR WILL GREATLY ENHANCE CAPACITY.SUCH AS HERE AT AMREF,THE GOVERNMENT (MOH)PROVIDES SOME HEALTH WORKERS |
|
SHOULD BE STRENGTHENED AND ENCOURAGED SINCE THEY ALLOW SUBSIDIES OF COST TO THE DIADVANTAGE LOWER INCOME POPULATION |
|
SINCE THE GORVENMENT CANT PROVIDE ALL THE HEALTH SERVICES THE PRIVATE SECTOR HAS TO HELP. |
|
SOMETIMES THE GOVERNMENT LACKS FUNDS FOR EXTRA TRAINING AND WHEN NGOS AND PRIVATE DONORS COME IN THEY HELP BOOST THIS TRAINING AND BETTER AWARENESS TO PROVIDE ESSENTIAL SERIVES.IT IS ALSO MOTIVATIONAL. |
|
SUPPORT IT BECAUSE THIS IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY ESPECIALLY FOR SLUM DWELLERS |
|
THE COMMUNITY WILL BENEFIT IN TERMS OF MEDICINE |
|
THE CONJUCTION BETWEEN THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE HEALTH CENTRE HAS REALLY HELPED PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY IN TERMS OF AFFORDABILITY CONSULTATION AND REFERAL SYSTEMS. |
|
THE EXERCISE MUST BE MONITORED WELL BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT MISUSES ALOT OF DRUG WHERE THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICES UTILISES IT WELL. |
|
THE GORVEMENT IS CORRUPT I.E IT DOESN'T PARTNER WITH THE SMALLER PRIVATE FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY. |
|
THE GORVENMENT DOES NOT HELP THE PRIVATE SECTOR WHEN IT COMES TO EQUIPMENTS |
|
THE GORVENMENT IS DISCRIMINATIVE SINCE IT DOESN'T WORK WITH PRIVATE FACILITY THAT ARE NOT WELL OF OR RATHER FULLY DEVELOPED INSTEAD IT PARTNERS WITH BIG PRIVATE PRACTTIONERSS LIKE NGO'S AND OTHER PRIVATE FACILITIES. |
|
THE GORVENMENT NEDS TO SUPPLY ALOT OF DRUGS TO PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICES. |
|
THE GORVENMENT OFFERS EMPLOYMENT TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
THE GORVENMENT OFFERS SOME BENEFITS TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
THE GORVENMENT SHOULD NOT GIVE UP IN SUPPORTING PRIVATE HEALTH SECTOR |
|
THE GORVENMENT SHOULD PROVIDE HELP TO THE PRIVATECOMMUNITY HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CAN REDUCE RATE OF CONGESTION IN HOSPITALS,DRUGS WILL BE AVAILABLE,DOCTORS/NURSES CAN OFFER PROPER MEDICATION /SERVICES,EMERGENCE CASES CAN BE SAVEDLIFE OF A PATIENT.,COSTS OF TREATMENT CAN BE LESS.POOR PE |
|
THE GOVERNMENT HAS FUNDS TO HELP BOOST PRIVATE SECTOR WHILE ON THE OTHER HAND THE PRIVATE SECTOR LINKS THE GOVERNMENT WITH THE PEOPLE |
|
THE GOVERNMENT INVOLVEMENT WITH THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS WILL BE DETERMINED TO THE LATTER SINCE CORRUPTION LEVELS IN THE FORMER GOVERNMENTWILL BE HINDERENCE TO SERVICE PROVISION. |
|
THE GOVERNMENT IS HELPING US BY PROVIDING ARVS TO MOST AFFECTED PEOPLE |
|
THE GOVERNMENT IS SENDING IT'S PEOPLE TO COLLECT DATA FROM THE PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS BUT IT DOESN'T RESPOND TO THE REQUESTS |
|
THE GOVERNMENT MAY OFFER EMPLOYMENT TO THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER AND BETTER FACILITIES |
|
THE GOVERNMENT NEED TO CONTROL THE PRICES OF DRUG AND THE PRIVATE MONOTOR THE GOVERNMENT ON SUPPLIES. |
|
THE GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO COME UP WITH A PROGRAMME THAT WILL REACH THE PRIVATE FACILITIES IN THE SLUMS. |
|
THE GOVERNMENT PROVIDES STAFF TO BOOST SERVICES IN SOME PRIVATE ORGANISATIONS,E.G.AMREF .ALSO PROVIDES SUPPLIES THOUGH THE GOVERNMENT IS LAX AT TIMES,COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IS IMPORTANT.PRIVATE FACILITIS HELP REACH THOSE PEOPLE WHO THE GOVERNM |
|
THE GOVERNMENT SHOUL TOTALL SUPPORT PRIVATE INSTITUTIONS IN PROVISION OF EQUIPMENT & DRUGS E.G ARVS |
|
THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD DO MORE TO HELP THE PRIVATE SECTOR SO AS INEQUALITY OF HEALTH SECTOR TO BE ENHANCED. |
|
THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD HELT GET RID OF QUACKS |
|
THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD STRIVE TO SUPPORT FACILITIES SUCH AS OURS WITH DRUGS AND EPUIPMENT BECAUSE THOUGH WE TRY AS MUCH ANS WE CAN TO HELP THE COMMUNITY, WE HAVE TO TURN DOWN PATIENTS WITHOUT TREATMENT DUE TO LACK OF FACILITIES |
|
THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD SUPPORT THE PRIVATE HEALTH FACILITIES IN THE COMMUNITY WITH MEDICINE |
|
THE GOVERNMENT WILL PROVIDE WHAT IS NEEDED IN PRIVATE FACILITIES AND WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE COMMUNITY.THE FACILITIES (PRIVATE) MIGHT BE ABLE TO OPERATE 01 24HRS LIKE SOME PUBLIC FACILITIES. |
|
THE GOVERNMENT WILL SUPPORT THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER IN PROMOTING HEALTH IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE HEALTH STATUS IN THE COMMUNITY HAS IMPROVED OVER THE LAST COUPLE OF YEARS AS THESE PARTNERSHIPS HAVE STRENGTHENED PRIMARILY BY SHARING EXPERIENCE AND SKILLS FROM BOTH PLAYERS. |
|
THE IDEA IS GOOD BECAUSE IT WILL MAKE THE PATIENTS TO HAVE THE BEST TREATMENT |
|
THE IDEA IS GOOD BECAUSE NURSES AND MIDWIVES WILL LEARN NEW EXPERIENCES DURING WORKS |
|
THE IDEA IS GOOD BECAUSE PEOPLE WILL LEARN DIFFERENT AND NEW IDEAS AND THEY WILL HAVE NEW EXPIRIENCES |
|
THE IDEA IS GOOD DUE TO THE CONDITION OF THE SERVICE OFFERD TO THE COMMUNITY .THE DEGREE OF SERVICE WILL INCREASE. |
|
THE IDEA IS OKEY,BECAUSE THEY WILL BE ASSISTING ONE ANOTHER IN NEEDY TIME. |
|
THE NGOS, PRIVATE SECTORS HAVE GREATLY ASSISTED IN INITIATING HEALTHCARE ON LOW INCOME AREAS AND THEREFORE GOVERNMENT SHOULD RECIPROCATE BY REDUCING BUREAUCRACY. |
|
THE OUTPUT IS HIGH WHICH BENEFITS THE COMMUNITY AT LARGE |
|
THE PARTNERING IS GOOD BECAUSE IT WILL INCREASE THE RATE OF DELIVERING THE SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE PARTNERS SHOULD HELP IN LOOKING AFTER THE COMMUNITY PEOPLE. |
|
THE PARTNERSHIP IS AGOOD INVENTION AND SHOULD HAVE WELL DEFINED ROLES TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE PARTNERSHIP IS FAIR SINCE IT CREATES GOOD MEDICAL SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY. |
|
THE PARTNERSHIP IS OF GREAT BENEFIT SINCE PRIVATE HEALTH WORKERS ARE ABLE TO ATTEND TO THEIR PETIENTS WELL AND ALSO REFER THEM TO PUBLIC HEALTH FACILITIES WHEN IT IS NECSSARY |
|
THE PARTNERSHIP IS STRONG AND I HAVE BENEFITED FROM THE PSYCHOLOGICAL COUNSELLING IN CHILDREN ORGANISED BY NASCOP |
|
THE PARTNERSHIP PROVIDES FOR FASTER SERVICE PROVISION TO THE AILING PUBLIC DUE TO INCREASED RESOURCE BASES FROM PARTNERSHIP |
|
THE PERTNERSHIP IS FAIR SINCE IT HELP THE POOR KENYANS WHO CAN'T AFFORD TO PAY EXPENSIVE SERVICES. |
|
THE PERTNERSHIP IS GOOD SINCE IT REDUCES THE EXPENSES ON THING LIKE DRUGS |
|
THE PRIVATE HOSPITALS ARE INACESSIBLE TO MANY POOR PEOPLE. AS SUCH MANY PUBLIC -PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP SHOULD BE BUT IN PLACE BY THE GOVERNMENT |
|
THE PUBLIC- PRIVATE PARTNERS SHOULD BE READY TO HELP BUT NOT TO CONDUCT ONLY RESEARCH ACTIVITIES WITHOUT GETTING BACK TO THEIR ESPONDENTS. |
|
THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP SHOULD WORK HAND IN HAND WITH THE GORVENMENT TO REDUCE BIRTH DEATHS AND MONITOR ALL CASES OF DELIVERIES. |
|
THE RESPONDENT BELIEVES THIS WILL ONLY WORK IF THE GOVERNMENT IS COMMITTED AND ONLY IF CORRUPTION IS UNMUSKED. |
|
THE RESPONDENT CLAIMS THAT THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT ASSIST PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS. SO SINCE IT IS A PARTNERSHIP, SHE THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE NOW THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS WILL BE WELL EQUIPED TO ASSIST THE COMM |
|
THE RESPONDENT FINDS IT AGOOD IDEA GENERALLY BECAUSE THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT THE PEOPLE IN THE SLUM AREAS NEED.HER HOOPE IS THAT THIS PROJECT IS NOT IDLE TALK.THIS TIMETHEY SHOULD WALK THE TALK |
|
THE RESPONDENT INITIALLY,THOUTH THAT THE PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP WERE A WAY OF HIGHER RANKED PEOPLE USED TO GAING .NOW AFTER THE EXPLANATION ,SHE FINDS IT AGOOD IDEA BECAUSE SHE EXPECTS THAT AMONG THE BENEFITS OF IT IS EMPLOYMENT AND ALLOW |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS POSITIVE ABOUT THE IDEA. SHE THINKS THAT BY THIS THEY WILL BE ABLE TO REACH OUT TO THE PEOPLE IN THE SLUMS AND THEREBY BE ABLE TO HELP THEM. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS VERY POSITIVE ABOUT THE PROJECT /ALTHOUGH HER OPINION IS THAT FIELD RESEARCHERS USUALLY COEM EVERY YEAR TO ASK QUESTIONS AND LATER DISAPPEAR.SO SHE IS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROJECT IDEARS. |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS WELL TRAINED AND CAN WORK IN ANY FIELD SO SHE FEELS IT WILL HELP CREATE EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES FOR BOTH PRIVATE AND PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS |
|
THE RESPONDENT OPINION WAS THAT AS LONG AS THE PROJECT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED ,IT IS A GOOD I DEA. |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID AS LONG AS THE PARTNERSHIP IS OF ECONOMIC BENEFIT TO HIM, IT'S A GOOD PARTNERSHIP |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID PARTNERSHIP WAS A GOOD IDEA AS LONG AS THERE IS TRANSPARENCY |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT THE IDEA OF PARTNERSHIP IS GOOD B UT SHE IS WAITING FOR THE REAL ACTION |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THE PARTNERSHIP IS A GOOD IDEA AND WANTED TO SEE BOTH PARTIES WORKING TOGETHER HONESTLY |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THE PARTNERSHIP IS A GOOD IDEA AS IT IS BREAKING THE BOND BETWEEN THE RICH AND THE POOR AND DISCRIMINATION.IT WILL MAKE EACH OTHERS BE PARTNERS NOT RIVALS |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THE PARTNERSHIP IS GOOD AND BETTER SINCE THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE WORKING TOGETHER WITH THE PRIVATE |
|
THE RESPONDENT SAID THE PARTNERSHIP IS HEALTHY AND WOULD BE BETTER FOR THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT THIKS THAT THE PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS IS A GOOD IDEA. SHE THINKS THAT BY THIS. THE GOVERNMENT WILL CREATE EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITIES, EQUIPMENT AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA ESPECIALLY WHERE SANITATION IS COCERNED.SHE ALSO HOPES THAT THE PROJECT WILL OFFER EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUINITIES TO THE QUALIFIED BUT UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS IT IS VERY GOOD IDEA SHE BELIEVES THAT BY PARTNERING .SHE WILL DO BETTER THAN SHE DOES BY HERSELF. |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA .THERE WOULD NOT BE THAT FEAR OF WORKING TOGETHER CONTROL AND SUPERVISION OF MEDICAL PEOPLE BY ELIMINATION OF QUACKS.CONTROL OF THEFT OF MEDICINE AND GENERAL CORRUPTION |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA BECAUSE APART FROM THE FACT THAT THE COMMUNITY MEMMBERS WILL RECEIVE HEALTH SERVICES, SHE WILL ALSO BE ABLE TO BOOST HERSELF FINANCIALLY |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD IDEA BUT ONLY IF THE GOVERNMENTS PLAN IS NOT TO SQUANDER PEOPLES MONEY FOR SELF GAIN |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GOOD INITIATIVE WHERE THE PROJECT WILL REALLY ASSIST THE PEOPLE ON THE GROUND. THIS THE PROJECT WILL DO BY OFFERING CURATIVE AND PREVENTIVE SERVICES TO THE PEOPLE. |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS A GREAT IDEA THAT WILL BE VERY MUCH BENEFICIAL TO ESPECIALLY THE PEOPLE LIVING IN THE SLUM AREAS |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS APERFECT IDEA.SHE SAYS THAT THE GORVRNMENT CANNOT DO EVERYTHING BY IT SELF .THE NGO'S MUST COME IN .IN CASE THE PROJECT WILL BE RECOGNIZED. |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT IT IS WELL FRAMED AND TIMED AND THAT THROUGH IT THE LOCALITY WILL OBTAIN A LOT BRAVO TO THE INITIATIVE |
|
THE RESPONDENT THINKS THAT SINCE THE PROJECT AIMS THE SLUMS, IT IS A QUITE CONSIDERATE PROJET AND THEREFORE A GOOD IDEA |
|
THE RESPONDENT THOUGHT THAT THE GORVENMENT-PRIVATE PASRTNERSHIPS WILL HELP ELIMINATE THE QUACKS IN THE SLUMS,IMPROVE THE HEALTH FACILITIES AND OFFERS EMPLOYMENT TO THE QUALIFIED PEOPLE IN THE SLUMS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FOR THE PARTNERSHIP AND EXPECT THE GOVERNMENT TO ASSIST THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FOR THE PARTNERSHIP AND HE WANTED THE GOVERNMENT TO BE RESPONSIBLE IN WHAT IS HAPPENING |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS FOR THE PARTNERSHIP AS IT WILLL BE OF HELP TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS HAPPY FOR THE PARTNERSHIP AS IF THERE WILL BE BENEFITS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS HAPPY WITH THE PARTNERSHIP AND WANTED THE GOVERNENT TO BE SAFE WITH THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP AND WANT PARTNERS TO BE IN EQUAL GROUND |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP AS IT WILL HELP THE COMMUNITY AND GOOD WORKING CONDITIONS SHOULD BE SET TO RUN THE PARTNERSHIP. |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP AS LONG AS THE COMMUNITY IS GOING TO BENEFIT FROM IT |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP AS LONG AS WE ARE SERVING THE SAME COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP SINCE BOTH PARTIES ARE GOING TO WORK TOGETHER |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP SINCE IT IS A GOOD IDEA |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP SINCE IT WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PEOPLE IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SLUM AREA |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN FULL SUPPORT OT THE PARTNERSHIP BUT DID NOT WANT THE GOVERNMENT TO CONTROL THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN SUPPORT OF THE PARTNERSHIP BUT HE SAID IT IS MORE OF A PUBLIC RELATION (STILL ILLUSIVE) |
|
THE WHOLE THING IS GOOD BECAUSE IT WILL SUPPORT THE COMMON TO ONE EXTENT OF REDUCING THE DEATH RATE. MORE DISEASES WILL BE PREVENTED THAN CURING |
|
THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN POLICIES ,THEY SHOULD HARMONISE AND STEAMLIN THE POLICIES. |
|
THERE IS STILL ALOT TO BE DONE |
|
THERE SHOULD BE MORE NETWORKING AND COOPERATION, THERE SHOULD BE CLEAR GUIDELINE ON REFERRAL OF PATIENT FROM PRIVATE TO PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS |
|
THEY ARE USEFUL MORE SO IN THE INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS AND SLUM THUS SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED |
|
THEY HELP BRING SERVICE TO THE UNDERSERVED |
|
THEY HELP EACH OTHER . THE GOVERNMENT HELPS THE PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDERS WITH MEDICINE AND PRIVATE HEALTH SERVICE PROVIDER HELPS THE COMMUNITY |
|
THEY SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED |
|
THEY SHOULD BE READY TO LISTEN TO THE VOICE OF THE POOR COMMUNITY |
|
THEY SHOULD IMPROVE ON THE WAY THEY HELP THE PRIVATE SECT I.E SHOULD OFFER HIV AND AIDS TESTING MACHINES TO THE COMMUNITY |
|
THEY SYNERGISE EACH OTHER |
|
THIS WILL IMPROVE HEALTH IN THE COMMUNITY |
|
THOUGH GOOD, THEY ARE PURELY COORDINATED IN OUR SETUP. PROPER MANAGEMENT STRUCTURES NEED TO BE PUT IN PLACE |
|
TREATMENT PROCEDURES WILL BE STANDARDIZED,QUALITY AND PROFESSIONAL CARE WILL BE GIVEN TO THE COMMUNITY,PRIVATE HEALTH PRACTITIONER WILL BE UPDATED ON CURRENT TREATMENT REGIMENS,GOVERNMENT WORKLOAD WILL BE REDUCED,IF PRIVATE PRACTITIONERS ARE WE |
|
UNIFORMITY OF SERVICES DUE TO UNIFORM POLICIES, HELPS GIVE BETTER SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY IN THAT MORE PEOPLE ARE REACHED, PRIVATES CAN DONATE DRUGS / EQUIPMENT WHERE THE GOVERNMENT IS UNABLE, MORE PERSONEL WILL BE TRAINED TO OFFSET SHORTAGE |
|
VERY GOOD SINCE THE PRIVATE SECTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTION SINCE MANY OF THE WORKING DON'T HANDLE PATIENTS AND ALSO NURSES CAN BE PAID SINCE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN BE ABLE TO PAY |
|
WELL BUT MUST MONITOR ALL HEALTH SERVICES MOSTLY IN SLUMS AND SPONSOR WITH MEDICATION AND OTHER MATERIALS |
|
WELL PARTNERSHIP BUT ALSO SUPPOSED TO BE EXTENDED TO PRIVATE FACILITIES BECAUSE THEY RECEIVE A LARGE NUMBER OF PATIENTS HENCE NEED SUPPORT OF DRUGS |
|
WELL SUPPOSED TO BE EXTENDED TO OTHER FACILITIES AT SOME AREAS |
|
WELL,BECAUSE WELL MONITORING AND NETWORKING |
|
WHEN GOVERMENT COLLABORATE WITH PRIVATE SECTOR THE SERVICES WILL BE UP TO DATE, BECAUSE THE MANPOWER AND DRUGS WILL BE AVAILABLE |
|
WHEREAS THE PRIVATE SECTOR PLAYS A VERY IMPORTANT ROLE IN HEALTH CARE PROVISION, THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT SEEM TO BE DOING ENOUGH TO ASSIST THEM |
|
WHEREAS THE GOVERNMENT HELPS IN PROVISION OF ESSENTIALS LIKE DRUGS, IT SHOULD DO MORE LIKE ASSISTING HEALTH PROVIDERS IN PRIVATE SECTOR GET SCHOLARSHIP |
|
WHOM THE GOVERNMENT WORKS TOGETHER THEY FINANCIALLY HELP OTHER |
|
WILL BE ABLE TO OFFER BETTER SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY MEMBERS |
|
WILL HELP IMPROVE SERVICES TO THE COMMUNITY CONCERNED,MATERIAL WISE AND FINANCES. |
|
WITH THIS COMBINED EFFORT TOWARDS ONE GOAL I.E HELPING THE COMMUNITY IS A GOOD THING. THIS WILL TOTALLY IMPROVE HEALTH CARE. |
|
YOU CANNOT TRUST THE GOVERNMENT |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.