Value |
Category |
102 - THERE SHOULD HAVE BEEN PROVISION FOR TWO CONTACTS FOR THOSE WHO INSIST ON TWO CONTACTS |
|
204 HE HAS ATTENDED MOST OF THE SERVICE GUIDELINES 206 THE RESPONDENT WAS QUITE WILLING TO PARTICIPATE IN THE PROJECT. |
|
204 THE RESPONDENT HAS ALREADY DONE MOST OF THE SERVICE GUIDELINES. THIS SHOWS THAT SHE IS HIGHLY QUALIFIED AND LEARNED. |
|
204 THE RESPONDENT HAS ATTENDED TRAINING IN MOST OF THE SERVICE GUIDELINES, ESPECIALLY HIV BASED ONES |
|
204 THE RESPONDENT IS NOT VERY WILLING TO ATTEND SERVICE GUIDELINES SIMPLY BECAUSE SHE HAS NO TIME |
|
204 THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY INTERESTED IN THE SERVICE GUIDELINES |
|
ALL QUESTION WERE ANSWERED |
|
ALL QUESTION WERE WELL ANSWERED . |
|
ALL QUESTION WERE WELL ANSWERED EXCEPT QUESTION 114 WHERE SHE REFUSED TO NAME THE FACILITY |
|
ALL QUESTIONS WERE ANSWERED WELL.RESPONDENT SEEMS TO UNDERSTAND MOST OF THESE QUESTIONS |
|
ALL QUESTIONS WERE PROPERLY ANSWERED |
|
ALL QUESTIONS WERE WELL ANSWERED |
|
ALL QUESTIONS WERE WELL UNDERSTOOD AND WELL ANSWERED |
|
ALL THE QUESTION WERE WELL ANSWERED |
|
ALL WAS OKEY APART FROM THE SIGNATURE PART AND TELEPHONE PART WHERE SHE REFUSED TO GIVE OUT. |
|
DUE TO THE ORGANIZATIONS CODE OF CONDUCT, THE NURSE COULD NOT SIGN OR GIVE HER CONTACTS FOR FEAR OF BEING DISCOVERED TO HAVE BROKEN THE SAME |
|
EXAMINES PREGNANT WOMEN TO CHECK ON BABY POSITION AND CANCONDUCT DELIVERY |
|
HE HAD NOT ATTENDED ANY SERVICE GUIDELINE TRAINING |
|
IN QUESTION 105,THE RESPONDENT HAD BEEN TRAINED AS A NURSE BUT NOT QUALIFIED TO BE CALLED ENROLLED OR REGISTERED NURSE. |
|
IN QUESTION 118,THE RESPONDENT SAID THAT THE NUMBER OF CLIENTS SERVED IS HIS PRIVACY,THEREFORE REFUSED TO ANSWER THE QUESTION |
|
IN QUESTION 204 THE RESPONDENT IS WILLING TO BE TRAINEDIN ALL THE SERVICE S GUIDELINE SBUT HE IS WONDERING BOUT THE TIME. |
|
MISSING |
|
NIL |
|
NO COMMENT |
|
NO COMMENT. |
|
NO COMMENTS |
|
NO COMMENTS. |
|
NO COMMETNS. |
|
NONE |
|
NOT APPLICABLE |
|
ON QUESTION 114 THE RESPONDENT DOES NOT WORK THERE BUT THEY NETWORK IN CASE OF ANY COMPLICATED CASE OF DELIVERY SHE HAS TO REFER TO THE TWO KNH AND PUMWANI. |
|
Q 204 - SOME RESPONDENT SAY YES BUT HAS TRAINED CODE (9), NO TWO CODES CAN BE CIRCLED AT THE SAME TIME |
|
Q106- FOR THE PRACTICING PERSONEL, IT SHOULD HAVE BEEN A MAIN CODE. |
|
Q109 - THE SKIP FOR RETIRED AND RETIRE IS NOT CORRECT |
|
Q118 - IS IT THE PATIENTS THAT INDIVIDUAL HEALTH WORKERS SEES OR THE FACILITY |
|
Q118 - RESPONDENT WONDERED IF THE NUMBER IS FOR EACH SEPERATE SERVICES OFFERED |
|
Q204 ->SHE IS WILLING TO BE TRAINED IN ALMOST ALL THE GUIDELINES AVAILABLE |
|
Q204- THE RESPONDENT IS WILLING TO BE TRAINED ON ALL THE GUIDELINES BEING OFFERED. |
|
Q208 - RESPONDENTS ARE MOSTLY FOCUSING ON HOW THEY WILL BENEFIT FROM THE GOVERNMENT AND NOT VICE VERSA |
|
QUESTION - THE RESPONDENT DID NOT HAVE ANY LICENCE AS SHE WAS ON ATTACHMENT |
|
QUESTION 112 - HAS GOT THE CERTIFICATE BUT NO LICENCE |
|
QUESTION 112 - SHE HAS NO PRACTICING LICENSE BUT ONLY HOLDS A CERTIFICATE |
|
QUESTION 112 - THE RESPONDENT HAVE NO LICENSE BUT ONLY HOLDS THE CERTIFICATE |
|
QUESTION 112 - THE RESPONDENT HAVE ONLY THE CERTIFICATE BUT USES THE CLINIC OWNER'S LICENCE |
|
QUESTION 112 - THE RESPONDENT WAS USING THE CLINIC OWNER'S LICENCE |
|
QUESTION 206 AND 207 SHOULD BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY ON. |
|
QUESTION ON SERVICE GUIDELINESESPECIALLY 204 (19) NEED TO BE DEFINED CLEARLY. IT APPEARED A BIT AMBIGUOUS TO THE RESPONDENT. |
|
QUESTION111 WAS DEEME TO BE OFFENSIVE SINCE HEALTH PRACTIONNERS IN GOVERNMENT FACILITIES DIN'T CARRY THEIR LICENCES OF PRACTICE |
|
QUESTIONS 116 AND 117 SEEMED TO TROUBLE THE RESPONDENT BECAUSE MOST OF THE SERVICES INDICATED ARE NOT OFFERED IN THE HEALTH FACILITY |
|
QUESTIONS 206 AND207 WERE NOT WELL UNDERSTOOD OR WERE MISINTERPRATED |
|
QUESTIONS ARE OKEY |
|
QUESTIONS ON SERVICE GUIDELINES SHOULD BE RESPONDED TO BY ORGANIZATION AND ITS PARTNERS. |
|
RESPONDENT ENTHUSIASTIC ABOUT PROSPECTS OF TRAINING I.E QUESTION 207. |
|
RESPONDENT WAS RUSTY ON THE SERVICE GUIDELINES QUESTIONS |
|
SAID HE HAS HELPED IN EMERGENCY DELIVERY BECAUSE HE IS TRAINED INTO IT. |
|
SECTION |
|
SHE WOULD REALLY LIKE TO HAVE THE TRAINING QUESTION 204 |
|
THE RESPONDEBNT WAS AWARE OF Q 203 AND ASKED WHEN THE TRAINING WILL COMMENCE.OFFERS FREE SERVICES SINCE MOST PEOPLE CANNOT AFFORD THE CHARGES. |
|
THE RESPONDENT COULD NOT RECALL WELL THE TYPE OF SERVICE GUIDELINE HE HAD UNDERGONE TRAINING ON |
|
THE RESPONDENT FEELS THAT QUESTION 204,206 AND 207 SHOULD BE ACTED UPON TO BRING EFFICIENT SERVICES TO THE SOCIETY AND COMMUNITY AS A WHOLE |
|
THE RESPONDENT IS PARTICLARLY KEEN ON VOLUNTEER ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE COMMUNITY |
|
THE RESPONDENT REFUSED TO SIGN AND GIVE HER CONTACT DETAILS BUT MOST OF THE OTHER INFORMATION WAS GIVEN WITH EASE |
|
THE RESPONDENT UNDERSTOOD ALL QUESTION WITHOUT EVEN ASKING THE INTERVIEWER TO EXPLAIN FURTHER |
|
THE RESPONDENT UNDERSTOOD ALL THE QUESTIONS |
|
THE RESPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW ABOUT QUESTIONS 204 (19) I.E WHAT IT IMPLIED AND ALSO 204 (12) |
|
THE RESPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW MORE ABOUT QUESTION 204(19) AND WHAT IT ENTAILED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WANTED TO KNOW WHEN TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES AS INDICATED IN QUESTION 207 WILL BE OFFERED |
|
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT SURE ON THE THE LAST YEAR ,SHE HAD HER TRAININGON SERVICE GUIDELINES. |
|
THE SECTION SERVICE GUIDDINES WAS CONFUSING TO THE RESPONDENT BECAUSE THOUGH SHE HAD ATTENDED VARIOUS SERVICE GUIDDLINE SEMINARS, SHE WANTED TO BE RE-EDUCATED |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.