| Value |
Category |
| A VERY GOOD INTERVIEW AND THE INTERVIWEE WAS SO ENTHUSIATIC AND INFORMED |
|
| A WELCOMING AND WARM SCIENCE TEACHER HE PROVIDED THE REQUIRED INFOMATION |
|
| COMFORTABLE |
|
| CONDUCTED WELL WITHOUT MUCH PROBLEM AS THE INTERVIEWER LOOKED FRIENDLY AND READY TO ASSIST |
|
| COOPERATIVE |
|
| DESPITE THE BUSY SCHEDULE OF THE DEPUTY HEADTEACHER, HE WAS COOPERATIVE AND A GOOD RESPONDENT |
|
| DURING THE INTERVIEW, THERE WAS A BREAK OF APPROXIMATELY 5 MIN OF WHICH THE INTERVIEW HAD SOME CONSULTATION WITH HEADTEACHER |
|
| FAIR |
|
| FINE AND CHALLANGED THE TEACHER IN AREAS TO IMPROVE |
|
| FINE AND GAVE CHALLENGES TO THE TEACHER |
|
| FOUND THE INTERVIEW VERY GOOD |
|
| FREE PRIMARY EDUCATION HAS HELPED THE SCHOOL ALOT SINCE MOST PUPILS ARE FROM POOR BACKGROUND |
|
| GOOD |
|
| GOOD AND VERY ENCOURAGING TO THE TEACHER |
|
| GOOD AND VERY IMPORTANT TO THE TEACHER |
|
| GOOD WORK |
|
| Good, she was very responsive and helpful |
|
| I FEEL TO THANK YOU FOR YOUR INTERVIEW AND I HOPE IT WILL BE OF OUR GOOD BENEFIT |
|
| I WAS PLEASED WITH THE INTERVIEW AND TOOK PART PROMPTLY TO ANSWER ALL WHAT I WAS ASKED |
|
| I'VE HIGHLY APPRECIATED THE INTERVIEW FOR IT HAS BEEN CONDUCT IN A FRIENDLY WAY |
|
| INTERVIEW INTERRUPTED BY CONSULTATIONS. THE HEADTEACHER IS THE MATHEMATICS TEACHER SO NOT OBSERVED BY HEADTEACHER |
|
| INTERVIEW WAS COMFORTABLE AND FELT AT HOME DURING THE INTERVIEW PROCESS |
|
| INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND WILL HELP THE LEANING ENVIROMENT FOR LEARNERS SUCCESSFUL |
|
| INTERVIEWEE QUITE STRAIGHT FORWARD AND CONSISTENT |
|
| INTERVIEWEE WAS RELAXED COOPERATIVE AND POSITIVE ABOUT THE RESEARCH |
|
| IT GIVES A POSITIVEREINFORCEMENT IN AREAS OF DIFFICULTIES AMONGST THE LEARNERS |
|
| IT HAS BEEN ENJOYABLE |
|
| IT HAS PROVOKED IN A WAY A CHALLENGE GIVEN ME A CHANCE TO IMPROVE |
|
| IT IS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE I BELIEVE,THIS WAY OUR COUNTRY WILL PRODUCE STARS IN FUTURE |
|
| IT WAS A GOOD INTERVIEW, ALL THE INFORMATION REQUIRED WAS GIVEN |
|
| IT WAS A RECOMMMENDED ONE AND IT MAKES ME FEEL THAT I AM WORTH BEING A TEACHER |
|
| IT WAS A SUCCESSFUL INTERVIEW |
|
| IT WAS A WELL CHECKED INTERVIEW |
|
| IT WAS GOOD |
|
| IT WAS GOOD AND ENCOURAGING |
|
| IT WAS GOOD AND REAL MOVING QUESTIONS ASKED ACCURATELY AND THE INTERACTION FREELY |
|
| IT WAS WELL CONDUCTED AND THE QUESTIONS WERE CLEAR |
|
| ITS OKAY GIVING ME A CHANCE TO IMPROVE |
|
| It has made me to remember some of the things i must do |
|
| It's very important if incase you could visit all primary schools instead of picking individual schools also incase of any support assist untrained teachers to train |
|
| MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE IN STD 6 ARE BOTH TAUGHT BY THE SAME PERSON |
|
| MOST PEOPLE IN N.E PROVINCE ARE UNEDUCATED, GOVERNMENT SHOULD TRY TO ENHANCE EDUCATION IN THIS AREA |
|
| NEXT TIME GIVE MORE TIME TO PREPARE |
|
| PERFECT AND GOOD |
|
| QUESTIONS NOT TOO SENSITIVE TO PRIVATE LIFE |
|
| RECIEVED VERY MAXIMUM COOOPERATION FROM THE INTERVIEWEE |
|
| RELATIVE TO SUBJECT |
|
| RESPONDENT WAS ACTIVELY INVOLVED |
|
| TEACHER COPERATED WELL |
|
| TEACHER HAS BEEN IN THIS SCHOOL SINCE OCTOBER ,2008. |
|
| TEACHER QUITE PREPARED AND CONFIDENT IN TAKING THE INTERVIEW |
|
| TEACHER WAS INVOLVED |
|
| TEACHING AND LEARNING MATERIALS SHOULD BE GIVEN AS WELL AS ORGANISING SEMINARS FOR ENGLISH TEACHERS |
|
| THE ASSESMENT WAS GOOD AND I LEARNT A LOT. THANK YOU |
|
| THE CLASS SIZE IS TOO LARGE COULD THE STAKE HOLDERS WORK AT WAYS TO REDUCE NUMBER OF PUPILS PER CLASS FER BETTER PERFORMANCE |
|
| THE CURRENT MATH TEACHER HAS HANDLED THE CLASS FOR JUST ONE WEEK OWING TO THE TRANSFER OF THE FORMER TEACHER |
|
| THE EDUCATION RESOURCE CENTRE IS NOPT WORKING DUE TO LACK OF MANPOWER. CLASS ARE INSECURE DUE TO WORN OUT BUILDINGS |
|
| THE EXCERCISE WAS GOOD AND WE HOPE IT CONTINUES |
|
| THE EXERCISE WAS GOOD |
|
| THE INTERVIEW HAS BEEN SO SUCCESSFUL AND I WISH THIS INTERVIEW WILL BRING AN IMPROVED STANDARD OF OUR EDUCATION |
|
| THE INTERVIEW IS OF GREAT IMPORTANCE TO ME AND THE PUPILS I TEACH |
|
| THE INTERVIEW IS OKAY ,HOPE THE INFORMATION WILL HELP YOU IN GUIDING THE GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATELY |
|
| THE INTERVIEW SHOULD BE MEANT TO IMPROVE THE EDUCATION SYSTEM AND TEACHERS WELFARE |
|
| THE INTERVIEW TOOK LONG BECAUSE OF DISRUPTIONS BUT THE TEACHER COOPERATED |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS APPROPRIATE AND RELEVANT |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED IN A PROFESSIONAL WAY,TOUCHED ON IMPORTANT AREAS |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS DONE GOOD |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND FRIENDLY |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND HAD VERY USEFUL INFORMATION |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND I WOULD RECOMMEND IT TO BE DONE MORE FREQUENTLY |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND VERY IMPORTANT IF ACTION IS TAKEN ON SOME AREAS |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND WE WERE HAVING A WIDE DISCUSSION WITH THE INTERVIEWER |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS HEALTHY ,CONFIDENTIAL AND DAY TO DAY PROBLEMS TOUCHING |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS INVOLVED |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS INVOLVING |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS LIVELY AND WILLING TO DIVULGE INFORMATION FREELY |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS QUITE GOOD AND ITS CATERING FOR THE CHILD'S NEEDS |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS QUITE IN ORDER AND REALY ENJOYABLE |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS QUITE RELEVANT TO EDUCATION SECTOR |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY USEFUL |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS WELL DONE. |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WAS WELL RESPONDED |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON VERY WELL AND THE INTERVIEWEE WAS INTRESTED TO GET THE FEEDBACK |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WENT ON WELL |
|
| THE INTERVIEW WSA INTERESTING TO THE TEACHER WHO CONSIDERED IT IMPORTANT BOTH TO HER AND PUPILS |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS AHEADTEACHER SO DURING THE INTERVIEW SHE HAD TO ATTEND TO ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS BEFORE WE COULD CONTINUE WITH THE INTERVIEW. |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS LESS THAN A MONTH OLD IN THE SCHOOL AND HE IS AN UNTRAINED TEACHER .HOWEVER ,HE COOPERATED DURING THE INTERVIEW |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS THE DEPUTY HEADTEACHER FOR THE SCHOOL |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS THE DEPUTY HEADTEACHER OF THE SCHOOL |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS THE DEPUTYHEAD TEACHER HENCE FACED SOME INTERRUPTIONS DURING THE INTERVIEW |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS THE HEADTEACHER OF THE SCHOOL |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE IS THE SCIENCE AND ENGLISH TEACHER OF CLASS SIX |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE WAS COOPERATIVE |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE WAS COOPERATIVE ,NO PROBLEMS ENCOUNTERED |
|
| THE INTERVIEWEE WAS WELL ORGANIZED AND COOPERATIVE THOROUGHT THE EXERCISE |
|
| THE INTERVIEWER COOPERATED |
|
| THE INTERVIEWER WAS COOPERATIVE AND INVOLVED |
|
| THE INTERVIEWER WAS INVOLVED |
|
| THE INTERVIEWERS CONDUCTED THERE RESEARCH VERY WELL GAIN ALOT FROM THEM |
|
| THE INTERVIWER WAS INVILVED |
|
| THE INTEVIEW WAS COMMENCED ON FRIDA BUT WAS COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING DAY DURING A CALL BACK SINCE THE INTERVIEWEE (WHO IS THE HEADTEACHER )WAS BUSY |
|
| THE MAJOR PROBLEM IN THE SCHOOL ISTHE LANGUAGE BARRRIER, MINISTRY SHOULD ORGANISE SEMINARS FOR ENGLISH TEACHERS IN LOWER PRIMARY |
|
| THE PUPILS BELIEVE THAT EXAMS COME FROM OTHER BOOKS NOT PROVIDED ONES, THEY NEED SUPPLEMENTARY BOOKS |
|
| THE QUESTIONS ARE APPROPRIATE |
|
| THE QUESTIONS ARE CLEAR AND EASY TO UNDERSTAND |
|
| THE RESEARCH WAS EXCELLENT |
|
| THE SCHOOL HAS MAMMOTH CLASSES THAT ARE DIFFICULT TO HANDLE. SCHOOL IS UNDERSTAFFED: CLASS 6 IS MERGED (68) PUPILS |
|
| THE SCIENCE TEACHER IS ALSO THE HEADTEACHER |
|
| THE SCIENCE TEACHER IS THE SAME WHO TEACHES ENGLISH SUBJECT,THAT IS WHY IT TOOK A SHORTER TIME |
|
| THE TEACHE WAS ABSENT IN CLASS BECAUSE HE WAS THE HEADTEACHER. THE EDUCATION RESOURCE IS THERE BUT NOW ITS NOT FUNCTIONING |
|
| THE TEACHER APPRECIATED THE INTERVIEW AS IT TOUCHED MOST OF THE TEACHING AREAS |
|
| THE TEACHER APPRECIATED THE INTERVIEW IT WAS GOOD AND OF IMPROTANCE |
|
| THE TEACHER COOPERATED THROUGHOUT THE INTERVIEW |
|
| THE TEACHER HAS BEEN A TEACHER IN SECONDARY SCHOOL FOR 19 YEARS AS A UT, SHE JOINED THE SCHOOL LAST YEAR |
|
| THE TEACHER HAS NO TRAINNING AND USES OE OF THE TSC PERMANENT TEACHERS SCHEME OF WORK |
|
| THE TEACHER IS ALSO THE HEADTEACHER AND SHE WAS COOPERATIVE |
|
| THE TEACHER IS THE SCHOOL DEPUTY AND HAS A LOT OF RESPONSIBILITIES IN ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGEMENT OF THE SCHOOL |
|
| THE TEACHER IS THE SCHOOL DEPUTY HEAD TEACHER , WAS COPERATIVE AND HORNEST |
|
| THE TEACHER JOINED THE SCHOOL AT THE BEGINNING OF THE YEAR, SHE WAS COOPERATIVE |
|
| THE TEACHER STOOD IN FOR THE ENGLISH TEACHER WHO HAD BEEN TRANSFERED TO ANOTHER SCHOOL; SOME OF THE QUESTIONS NEED REQULAR TEACHER TO ANSWER THOUGH THE INTERVIEW WASN'T HARD/BAD I'M NOT THE TEACHER IN THAT CLASS |
|
| THE TEACHER WAS COOPERATIVE AND RESPONDED OPENLY TO QUESTIONS |
|
| THE TEACHER WAS COOPERATIVE AND SHE IS THE ONE WHO TEACHES SCIENCE SUBJECT |
|
| THE TEACHER WAS COOPERATIVE DESPITE HIS BUSY SCHEDULE BEING THE SCHOOL DEPUTY |
|
| THE TEACHER WAS COOPERATIVE THOUGH WE HAD DISRUPTIONS |
|
| THERE WAS GOOD COOPERATION FROM THE INTERVIEWEE |
|
| VERY COOPERATIVE |
|
| VERY DETAILED AND IMPORTANT |
|
| VERY ENCOURAGING EXERCISE |
|
| VERY GOOD |
|
| VERY GOOD AND ENCOURAGING |
|
| VERY INQUISITIVE, RELEVANT AND CURRENT |
|
| VERY LONG |
|
| VERY WELL DONE |
|
| WAS GOOD AND NEEDED MORE VISITINGS THAN ONE |
|
| WELL DONE |
|
| a very interesting and important interview for my profession and my life experience in working condition |
|
| able to judge self and learn new things from interviewers |
|
| fair |
|
| good to the teacher, if it can improve the learning |
|
| good. the interview was conducted in a good manner. I was given a chance to respond positively |
|
| interesting |
|
| it is a positive and friendly one |
|
| it is general good since it is based on essential educational issues |
|
| it is good |
|
| it should be better if the information related to the interview be relayed to targeted teacher |
|
| it was okay, welcome again |
|
| it was very good |
|
| its okay |
|
| let the exercise continous to improve the academic standard of our pupils even to lower classes |
|
| maximum cooperation throughout the interview |
|
| the interview has been conducted in the right manner and can assist me as an english teacher |
|
| the interview was conducted after a call back had been made |
|
| the interview was important for the interviewer asked questions that geared to important aspects of learning |
|
| the interview was okay but time consuming |
|
| the interview was okey as it was dating with class activities said the teacher |
|
| the interview was successful and it was a reminder to the teacher about what to do. |
|
| the interview was very good |
|
| the interview was very good because we want to help the child |
|
| the interviewer was involved |
|
| the respondent was very cooperative and the process smooth |
|
| the teacher has been here for 6 months. the science teacher is the headteacher so is never observed by the headteacher, teaching science |
|
| the teacher hopes our research will assist in improving the quality of teaching in English in the school |
|
| the teacher joined the school this term and took over maths subject in class six |
|
| the teacher said the interview was beneficial to him as he knew now how to improve teaching |
|
| this was a good kind of interview that catered and cared for the child |
|
| this was lively needs to be carried occasionally |
|
| very good but organize training for science teachers |
|
| very good response |
|
| very positive |
|
| very well done |
|
| waiting for the report |
|
| we are grateful. Hope you will come back again |
|
| would like to have a written comment on the interview for reference |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
