Value |
Category |
CHILD DID NOT FINISH AS HE WAS CALLED BY THE HEAD TEACHER |
|
CLASS WAS VERY CROWDED |
|
EVENT AFTER SEVERAL ATTEMPTS THE STUDENT WAS INCAPABLE OF ANSWERING |
|
EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY IN READING AND WRITING |
|
GOOD |
|
HAD DIFFICULT IN HER READING AND WRITING |
|
I HAVE SEEN THE INTERVIEW HAS BEEN GOOD AND SO EASY. |
|
INTERVIEWEE PARTICIPATION REVEALED ITSELF |
|
IT HAS BEEN A GOOD INTERVIEW FOR THE DAY. |
|
IT IS VERY NICE |
|
IT WAS A BIT CHALLENGING |
|
IT WAS DONE |
|
IT WAS EASY |
|
IT WAS GOOD |
|
IT WAS MOTIVATIONAL MOMENT TO EVRYONE IN CLASS |
|
IT WAS NICE |
|
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL AND CHEERFUL TO EVERYONE IN CLASS |
|
IT WAS VERY GOOD. |
|
IT WAS WELL DONE |
|
IT WAS WELL DONE |
|
MADE AN EFFORT OF BEING A GOOD LISTENER |
|
NO COMMENT |
|
NO EXAMINATION CODE |
|
RESPONDENT COULD NOT RESIST BECAUSE THE REST WERE RESPONDING WILLINGLY |
|
SCHOOL HAS NO KNEC CODE |
|
SHE ASKED THE NEED OF ALL THE QUESTIONS ASKED |
|
SHE LOOKED TIRED AND UNWILLING TO CONTINUE |
|
SHE WAS KIND WHILE EXPLAINING |
|
THE CHILD WAS NOT IN A POSITION TO WRITE AND WAS NOT WRITING ANYTHING IN THE PAPER AND WAS JUST DISTURBING AND ASKING THE OTHERS QUESTIONS |
|
THE CLASS VERY CROWDED |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY EXCITIDED |
|
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY FINE AND EXCITING. |
|
THE INTERVIEWER WAS KEEN WHILE EXPLAINING THE PROCEDURE |
|
THEY ARE GOOD. |
|
THEY ASKED FORTHE RESULTS AFTER THE TEST AND INTERVIEW |
|
THEY HAVE TEACH US MANY THINGS WE SAY TO THEM WELCOME AGAIN. |
|
VERY GOOD |
|
VERY CROWDED CLASS |
|
VERY GOOD |
|
VERY GOOOD |
|
VERY WELL |
|
WAS GOOD |
|
WAS GOOD AND INTERESTING |
|
WAS INTERESTING |
|
WAS WEII DONE |
|
WAS WELL CONDUCTED |
|
WAS WELL DONE |
|
WAS WELL DONE. |
|
WAS WILLING |
|
WELL DINE. |
|
WELL DONE |
|
WELL DONE AND SUCCESSFUL |
|
WELL DONE. |
|
WELL DONE.WELL DONE. |
|
WELL DONR |
|
WELL DONW |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.