Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
1.4A -PERSONAL WANTED/SOUGHT APPROVAL FROM THE H/TEACHER AND ALSO FOR SECURITY REASONS | 1 | ||
4 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
5 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
5.2- PUPILS WRITE ON THEIR LAPS | 1 | ||
5.4 IN THIE GRADE SOME OF THE MATEDRILAS ARE NOT RELEVANT TO THE CHILDREN,ONLY THE TEACHERS USE. | 1 | ||
95 | 206 |
81.4%
|
|
99 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
995 | 32 |
12.6%
|
|
9995 | 7 |
2.8%
|
|
99995 | 4 |
1.6%
|
|
999995 | 1 |
0.4%
|
|
A VERY GOOD EXERCISE ESPECIALLY IN TESTING THE PUPILS COMPREHENSIVE | 1 | ||
AVERAGING RATING BECAUSE SOME SENSITIVE QUESTIONS ARE LEFT OUT IN THE QUESTIONAIRRE ACCORDING TO THE RESPONDENT'S VIEW THAT THE QUESTIONAIRRE SHOULD HAVE INCLUDED MORE QUESTIONS ON CERTAIN CLAUSES | 1 | ||
CLASS 6 ENGLISH TEACHER IS THE HEADMASTER AS WELL | 1 | ||
DUE TO THE SIZE, THERE IS A TEACHER WHO IS ASIGNED TO MARKING BOOKS | 1 | ||
FAIR AND CLEAR | 1 | ||
GOOD | 2 | ||
HE WAS BEEN A TEACHER FOR A MONTH ONLY HE IS HOPING TO CONTINUE WITH HIS STUDIES | 1 | ||
I HAVE LEARNT HOW TO IMPROVE. THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD. THE TEACHING OF ENGLISH | 1 | ||
IN 5.4, THE ITEMS ARE THERE BUT THE PUPILS ARE NOT IN THE STAGE OF USING THEM AND DUE TO SECURITY PURPOSES | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | 3 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL | 7 | ||
IS THE HEAD TEACHER AND TEACHES ENGLISH AND MATHS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
IT IS SUITABLE AND ENCOURAGING TO THE TEACHER.IT A GOODWORK | 1 | ||
IT WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL | 1 | ||
IT WAS WELL DONE. AT FIRST, THE RESPONDENT REFUSED IN THE DAY OF INTERVIEW, LATER WITH A NEW FACE ACCEPTED | 1 | ||
ITS GOOD TO HAVE THE INTERVIEW SO THAT YOU IMPROVE ON AREAS WHERE YOU'VE NOT DONE | 1 | ||
ITS WAS A GOOD EXERCISE | 1 | ||
M | 11 | ||
OK | 3 | ||
OK. AND VERY ORGANISED SMART TEACHER. | 1 | ||
ONE TEACHER IS ASIGNED TO TEACH ALL THE SUBJECTS IN THAT PARTICULAR CLASS | 1 | ||
Q 2.17 - HE IS THE H/TEACHER HE TEACHES BOTH MATHS AND ENGLISH IN CLASS 6 | 1 | ||
RESPODNET RESPODNED WELL | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT RESPONDED WELL | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE | 2 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE. SHE TEACHES MATHEMATICS IN THE SAME CLASS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE. THE ENGLISH TEACHER TEACHERS BOTH ENGLISH CLASS THREE AND CLASS SIX | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS GOOD AND VERY INFORMATIVE WITH THW NECESSARY INFORMATION | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS GOOD. | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE TOWARDS THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
SCHOOL NOT A KNEC EXAM CENTRE CANDIDATES TAKEN TO PARENT SCHOOL TO DO EXAMS (AIPCA MAKENDE ACADEMY) | 1 | ||
SUCCESSFUL | 11 | ||
TAKES ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3E | 1 | ||
TEACHER DOES NOT LESSON PLAN | 1 | ||
TEACHER DOUBLES UP AS AN ENGLISH AND MATHEMATICS TEACHER FOR CLASS 3 | 1 | ||
TEACHER HAS BEEN TEACHING THE SCHOOL FOR ONLY ONE MONTH | 1 | ||
TEACHER KEPT GOING OUT | 1 | ||
TEACHERS IN THIS SCHOOL DO NOT HAVE A TSC NO OR EMPLOYMENT NUMBER.THE SAME MATHS TEACHER HANDLES ENGLISH AS WELL. SO MATHS QNN WAS NOT ADMINISTERED. | 1 | ||
TEACHES BOTH CLASSES SIX AND THREE ENGLISH | 1 | ||
TEACHES BOTH ENGLISH AND MATHEMATICS IN CLASS 3 | 1 | ||
TEACHES BOTH ENGLISH AND MATHEMATICS IN CLASS SIX | 1 | ||
TEACHES BOTH GRADES THREE AND SIX ENGLISH | 1 | ||
TEACHES MATHS AND ENGLISH IN GRADE 3. | 1 | ||
TH TEACHER HAD NO EMPLOYMENT NUMBER NOR TSC NUMBER | 1 | ||
THE CLASS 3 TEACHER IS THE SCHOOL HEADTEACHER. | 1 | ||
THE CLASS HAS NO LIBRAR OR BOOK CENTRE | 1 | ||
THE CLASS NORMALLY GOES FOR TRIPS AT LEAST 2 TIMES A TERM | 1 | ||
THE CLASS SIX MATHS TEACHER IS THE SCHOOL HEADTEACHER | 1 | ||
THE DEPUTY HEADTEACHER WAS ALSO THE ENGLISH TEACHER IN GRADE SIX | 1 | ||
THE ENGLISH TEACHER IN GRADE 3 IS ALSO THE ENGLISH TEACHER IN GRADE6 | 1 | ||
THE HEADTEACHER TEACHES ENGLISH IN STD 3 AND MATHS IN STD 6 HENCE THESE TWO INTERVIEWS WERE DONE TOGETHER | 1 | ||
THE INTERIEW WAS EDUCATIONAL | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW IS GOOD BEACAUSE IT CUTS ACRISS ALL THE MATTER AND CHALLENGES FACING OPUPILS AND TEACHERS CREATES AWARENESS | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS AWAKENED A FEW AREAS OF TEACHING THAT AREN'T PUT INTO PRACTICE OFTEN. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS CONDUCTED AT THIS TIME BECAUSE THE PUPILS HAD TO GO HOME FOR LUNCH | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS FREQUENTLY INTERRUPTED BY THE QUALITY ASSURANCE OFFICERS WHICH DELAYED THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD AND THE TEACHER WAS COOPERATIVE BUT THE CLASS HAD BEEN TAKEN TO ANOTHER ROOM NOT THEIR EVERDAY CLASSROOM | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED WHEN THE TEACHER RECEIVED A CAL AND WAS TOLD THE CHILD HAD BEEN TAKEN TO THEATER. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY EXCELLENT AND VERY INTERACTIVE. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD.IT HAS ENCOURAGED ME TO IMPROVE MY EDUCATION LEVEL. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD.THIS WAS SO BECAUSE I HAVE LEARNED NEW TECHNIQUES FROM IT. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY JOVIAL AND GENEROUS IN GIVING INFORMATION | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY SKEPTICAL OF THE RESEARCH AND THUS UNCOOPERATIVE. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS WELL CONDUCTED | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS WELL RESPONDED TO | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WENT WELL TEACHES BOTH MATHS AND ENGLISH IN THIS GRADE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEWER WAS ALWAYS WILLING TO GIVE THE RIGHT INFORMATION | 1 | ||
THE PUPILS ARE MOSTLY ENGAGED IN MANY ACTIVITIES LIKE SCRAP METAL COLLECTION, WORK IN COFFEE PLANTATION AND IN QUARRY | 1 | ||
THE RESPODNET WAS COOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT FIRST HESITATED TO PARTICIPATE IN THE INTERVIEW BUT LATER CONSENTED | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT HAS JUST CLEARED FORM FOUR AND HAS NO TEACHER TRAINING PROFFESSION | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT IS THE ACTING ENGLISH TEACHER FOR CLASS 6 AND HOD ENGLISH | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT TOOK HER FREE TIME TO RESPONDENT TO THE QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT TOOK HIS FREE TIME TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONAIRE. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT TOOK THE INTERVIEW VERY POSTIVELY. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS ATTENTIVE HE'S ALS THE MATHS TEACHER FOR THE SAME GRADE. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS JOVIAL ALL THROUGH | 1 | ||
THE SAME TEACHER TEACHES BOTH ENGLISH AND MATHMATICS IN CLASS THREE | 1 | ||
THE SCHOOL HAS A LIBRARY | 1 | ||
THE SCHOOL HAS NO CODE NUMBER IT DOESN'T HAVE AN EXAMINATION INDEX NUMBER | 1 | ||
THE SCHOOL HAS NO EXAMINATION CENTER NUMBER YET TO BE GIVEN THIS YEAR | 1 | ||
THE SCHOOL HAS NOT REACHED STD 8 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHE5R DIDNT GIVE OUT THE TSC NUMBER | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER ALSO TEACHES ENGLISH AND MATHEMATICS IN GRADE 6 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER HAS BEEN IN THE SCHOOL FOR ONE MONTH | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER HAS JUST GRADUATED FROM THE COLLEGE THEREFORE NEW TO THE VARIOUS THINGS ASKED | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER HAS JUST REPLACED A BRITISH WHO IS AWAY AND IS THERE TEMPORARILY | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER HAS TAUGHT IN THE SCHOOL FOR TWO TERMS | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS ALSO THE HEADTEACHER OF THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS ASIGNED TO TEACH ALL THE SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS JUST FEW MONTHS OLD INTHE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS JUST FROM COLLEGE AND HAS JUST JOINED THE SCHOOL IN JANUARY THIS YEAR | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS NEW IN THE SCHOOL SO NOT AWARE OF MOST THINGS | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS NEW THEREFORE SHE DOESN'T KNOW ANY PARENT. | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS STILL NEW IN THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS THE DEPUTY HEAD IN THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS THE SAME FOR BOTH MATHEMATICS AND ENGLISH | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER IS VERY COPERATIVE | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER REALLY EMPHACIZED ON THE LACK OF PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER REFUSED TO COMPLETE THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER RESPONDED | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKE ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ALL THE SUBJECT IN THAT GRAD | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 IN THIS SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 2 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3. | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3B | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TAKES ON ALL THE SUBJECTS | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TEACHES ALL CLASS THREE SUBJECTS IN THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TEACHES ALL SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 IN THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TEACHES ALL THE SUBJECTS IN GRADE 3 | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER TEACHES MATHS IN CLASS 3. | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER WAS GOOD AND VERY INFORMATIVE | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER WAS IN A HURRY TO ATTEND A MEETING HENCE HAD TO RUSH THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER WAS NOT WELL DURING THE INTERVIEW AND TAKES ON ALL SUBJECTS | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER WAS VERY COOPERATIVE ALTHOUGH SHE HAS TAUGHT FOR ONLY 3 WEEKS | 1 | ||
THE TEACHER WHO IS A UT HAS JUST JOINED THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE TEACHERT HAS JUST JOINED THE SCHOOL IN THE LAST TWO MONTHS | 1 | ||
THERE ARE TWO TEACHERS TEACHING THE SAME SUBJECT IN THIS CLASS | 1 | ||
THERE WAS ALOT OF PRESSURE FROM DIRECTOR CLAIMING THE INTERVIEW WERE TIME WASTING | 1 | ||
THERE WAS NO BOOK CORNER SO THE TEACHER CARRIES THE TEXT BOOKS IN HER BAG. | 1 | ||
THERE WAS PRESSURE FROM DIRECTOT ABOUT TIME | 1 | ||
THERE WERA A FEAR INTERUPTIONS THUS TOOK A LITTLE BUT LONG TYM | 1 | ||
VERY CORPERATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
VERY GOOD | 5 | ||
VERY GOOD.THE GROUP WAS VERY FRIENDLY ESPECIALLY TO THE PUPILS. | 1 | ||
VERY INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
WAS INTERACTIVE. THE INTERVIEWEE FREELY GAVE INFORMATION | 1 | ||
WAS SO NICE AND THE THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COORPERATIVE | 1 | ||
WAS VERY GOOD | 7 | ||
WAS VERY GOOD AND INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
WAS VERY GOOD. THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
WAS VERY INTERACTIVE | 4 | ||
WAS VERY SUCCESFUL | 1 | ||
WAS WELL DONE | 1 |