Value | Category | Cases | |
---|---|---|---|
01 | 6 |
0.1%
|
|
02 | 2 |
0%
|
|
04 | 3 |
0.1%
|
|
05 | 1 |
0%
|
|
0995 | 1 |
0%
|
|
1995 | 1 |
0%
|
|
3.1 (B) RESPONDENT SAYS SHE DOESN'T KNOE ABOUT HOW TEACHERS TEACH IN PUBLIC AND THUS CANNOT COMPARE | 1 | ||
3.1(B) DEPENDAS WITH STRICTNESS OF THE HEADMASTER AND HIS DEDICATION AND PASSION TO SEE HIS SCHOOL EXCEL ACADEMICALLY | 1 | ||
3.1D RESPONDENT HAS NOT LIVED IN THE AREA FOR LONG TO KNOW THE NUMBER OF SCHOOL AVAILABLE | 1 | ||
3.2 D) RESPONDENT DOESN'T KNOW ABOUT BOOKS | 1 | ||
3.3 &3.4 CHILREN ARE NOT TO SCHOOL DUE TO LACK OF SCHOOL FEES. | 1 | ||
3.3A FUND RAISING FOR THE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
3.4 AND 3.3 IS NOT APPLICABLE AS PARENT DID NOT HAVE ANY CHILD IN SCHOOL IN THE LAST 12 MONTHS | 1 | ||
395 | 1 |
0%
|
|
5 | 2 |
0%
|
|
9 | 13 |
0.3%
|
|
92 | 1 |
0%
|
|
94 | 1 |
0%
|
|
95 | 3217 |
66.9%
|
|
953 | 2 |
0%
|
|
956 | 1 |
0%
|
|
958 | 1 |
0%
|
|
98 | 1 |
0%
|
|
99 | 1 |
0%
|
|
995 | 1550 |
32.2%
|
|
9958 | 1 |
0%
|
|
995995 | 1 |
0%
|
|
9985 | 1 |
0%
|
|
9995 | 2 |
0%
|
|
A BIT RELUCTANT TO ANSWER SOME QUESTION | 1 | ||
A GOOD INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
A GOOD RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
A VERY CANDID AND CO-OPERATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
ALL HIS CHILDREN ARE IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOL | 1 | ||
ALL WAS GOOD UP TO THE END | 1 | ||
ALL WAS O.K | 1 | ||
ALL WENT ON WELL | 1 | ||
AVERAGE | 5 | ||
BEING A TEACHER IN A PUBLIC SCHOOL, THE RESPONDENT WAS EVIDENTLY SUPPORTIVE OF HER COLLEAGUES | 1 | ||
BOTH SPOUSES RESPONDED | 1 | ||
CHILD HAD NOT JOINT PRIMARY SCHOOL LAST YEAR. | 1 | ||
CHILDREN HAVE NEVER GONE TO SCHOOL | 1 | ||
CHILDREN IN THIS HOUSEHOLD MISSED SCHOOL IN 2009 DUE TO FINANCE DIFFICUTIES | 1 | ||
CO OPERATIVE | 1 | ||
CO-OPERATIVE RESPONDENT. | 1 | ||
COMPLAINED ABOUT TIME | 1 | ||
COMPLETE | 1 | ||
COMPLETE AND SUCCESSFUL | 1 | ||
COMPLETED THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
CONDUCTED AT NIGHT | 1 | ||
COOPERATED | 1 | ||
COOPERATIVE | 31 | ||
COOPERATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
DECRIES DRILLING IN PRIVATE SCHOOL AS OPPOSED TO ACTUAL TEACHING IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS | 1 | ||
DIFFICULT RESPONDENT TO HANDLE | 1 | ||
DONE AT LOCATION V010069006 | 1 | ||
DROPPED OUT IN STD 8 | 1 | ||
ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUALS ONE AND NOT FOUR AS INDICATED ON THE LIST | 1 | ||
ENDED WELL | 49 | ||
ENTHUSIASTIC AND JOVIAL RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
FATHER PASSED SO MOTHER TAKES CARE OF ALL CHILD'S NEEDS | 1 | ||
FEW TEACHERS NOT ACTIVE | 1 | ||
FINE AND OK | 1 | ||
FIVE ELIGIBLE KIDS AND NOT SIX | 1 | ||
FPE GOOD FOR PARENT BAD FOR STUDENT | 1 | ||
GGOD | 1 | ||
GOOD | 33 | ||
GOOD AND COOPERATIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
GOOD AND FUTERATINE | 1 | ||
GOOD AND INTERACTIVE | 3 | ||
GOOD AND SUCCESSFULL | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIE | 1 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW | 63 | ||
GOOD INTERVIEW.THE COUPLE SEPARATED | 1 | ||
GOOD RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
GOOD RESPONSE | 36 | ||
GOOD RESPONSE FROM PARENT | 1 | ||
GOOD. | 3 | ||
GOOJD | 1 | ||
GOVERNMENT SCHOOL IS VERY EXPENSIVE ACCORDING TO RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS ARE DETERIORATING EVERYDAY | 1 | ||
HAS MOVED TO LOCATION V027146003 | 1 | ||
HHH LISTED ON THE CHECKLIST PASSED ON | 1 | ||
HHH ON CHECK LIST DIED LONG AGO | 1 | ||
HOUSEHOLD DOESNOT HAVE ANY SCHOOL GOING CHILDREN | 1 | ||
HOUSEHOLD HEAD IS AN OMG WHO HAS RETURNED BACK TO THE EA | 1 | ||
IN PUBLIC SCHOOL NO GOOD PERFORMANCE | 1 | ||
INGUISITIVE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
INITIALLY DONE BY DE11 BUT REPEATED BY EA11 | 1 | ||
INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
INTERESTING | 1 | ||
INTERRUPTION FROM A VISITOR WHO WANTED SOME ANTENTOUS | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW DONE AT LOCATION V010069006 | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW DONE AT LOCATION V014315005 | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW DONE AT V140117004 | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW SUCCESSFUL | 2 | ||
INTERVIEW SUCEESFUL AND RESPONDENT LIVELY | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW VERY SUCCESSFUL | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS GOOD THIUGH THE RESPONDENT HAD TO ASK THE ELDEST DAUGHTER FOR SOME ASISTANCE | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS INTERRUPTED SEVERALLY DUE TO SELLING WATER | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS OKAY | 3 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS OKAY. NO CHALLENGES FACED. | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS SMOOTH | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | 7 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL, THREE CHILDREN WERE TAKEN BY THE FATHER WHO SEPARETED FROM THE MOTHER. | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS SUCESSFUL | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS VERY SMOOTH | 1 | ||
INTERVIEW WAS VERY SUCCESSFUL | 5 | ||
IT WAS A TEACHING AND LEARNING TIME | 1 | ||
IT WAS DIFFICULT TO EXPLAINING TO HER THE OPTIONS | 1 | ||
IT WAS GOOD | 7 | ||
IT WAS GOOD THE RESPONDENT WAS CO-OPERATIVE. | 1 | ||
IT WAS GOOD. | 1 | ||
IT WAS OKAY | 2 | ||
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL | 7 | ||
IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. | 1 | ||
IT WAS SUCCESSFULL | 1 | ||
IT WAS WELL DONE. | 1 | ||
IT WAS WELL DONE. IT WAS A LEARNING EXPERIENCE. | 1 | ||
IT WAS WELL DONE. THE PARENTS MEET DURING SCHOOL CLOSING DAY AS PER 3.3 | 1 | ||
IT WAS WELL DONE.THE RESPONDENT MOVED FROM 005/003 TO 005/013 IT WAS SUCCESSFUL. | 1 | ||
IT'S WAS FINE, RESPONDENT ID NOT IN DSS DATABASE | 1 | ||
LACK OF LIGHT IN THE HOUSE IN THE EVENING | 1 | ||
LACK OF PGI RESULTED TO IT BEING DONE LAST | 1 | ||
LACK OF PUBLIC (FREE PRIMARY FACILITIES) | 1 | ||
LIVELY,SMOOTH AND INTERESTING | 1 | ||
LOCAL LANGUAGE USED | 1 | ||
LOW QUALITY EDUCATION IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS DUE TO OVERCROWDING ; PARENTS VIEWS | 1 | ||
M | 7 | ||
MOST PRIVATE SCHOOLS ARE OF POOR BUILDING/HOUSES CONVERTED TO SCH(RESPODENT | 1 | ||
MOTHER SEEMS DEFENSIVE | 1 | ||
MOTHER STAYS WITH CHILDREN, FATHER COMES ONCE IN A WHILE. | 1 | ||
NEVER WANTED TO TALK ABOUT IT | 1 | ||
NEW LOCATION V013375002 | 1 | ||
NEW LOCATION V037067001 | 1 | ||
NEW STRUCTURE V027170003 | 1 | ||
NO CHALLENGES FACED. | 1 | ||
NO COMMENT | 26 | ||
NO COMMENT. | 10 | ||
NO COMMENTS | 1 | ||
NO COOMENT | 1 | ||
NO COOMENT. | 1 | ||
NO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL AROUND PARENTS WISH TO TAKE CHILDREN POOR STUDENT PROBLEM PERFOMANCE | 1 | ||
NO PUBLIC SCHOOL GROUND PARENTS FORCED TO SEND STUDENTS TO PRIVATE | 1 | ||
NONE | 97 | ||
NONE. | 3 | ||
OK | 4 | ||
OKAY | 2 | ||
OKEY | 1 | ||
ONE ELIGIBLE INDIVIDUAL FOUND AND NOT THREE | 1 | ||
PARENT FULL OF PRAISE FOR PRIVATE SCHOOLS | 1 | ||
PARENT FULL OF PRAISE FOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS | 1 | ||
PARENT IS NOT INCLUDED IN SCHOOL MATTERS AS FOR NOW SINCE CHILDREN FINISHED | 1 | ||
PARENT RELOCATED HOME. | 1 | ||
PARENT SAID FREE PRIMARY EDUCATION CAME TO SPOIL EVERYTHING | 1 | ||
PARENT SEEMED UNSURE OF HER OPINIONS | 1 | ||
PARENT THINKS THAT IN PUBLIC SCHOOLS STUDENTS ARE NOT CLOSE TO TEACHERS | 1 | ||
PARENT WAS UNDECIDED | 1 | ||
PARENT WAS RESPONSIVE | 1 | ||
PARENT WAS VERY ARROGANT. | 1 | ||
PARENTS COMPLAINED THAT TEACHERS AT NGUNYUMU HAVE LITTLE CONCERN & DONT TEACH ENGLISH | 1 | ||
PARENTS DONATED 20 BROOMS TO CHILD'S SCHOOL | 1 | ||
PRIVATE SCHOOLS ARE MORE THAN ENOUGH. THERE IS NEED TO EXPAND SCHOOLS TO ACCOMODATE MORE PUPILS BUT NOT ADDING MORE NEW SCHOOLS. | 1 | ||
RECENTLY SAMPLED HOUSEHOLD IS A SLEEPING AREA BUT HOUSEHOLD WHERE EVEN PARENTS ARE IN V018105001 | 1 | ||
REGRETS SENDING THEM TO PUBLIC SCHOOL | 1 | ||
REPLACEMENT FOR LOCATION V027136001 | 1 | ||
RESP. SAID WILL NEVER RESPOND AGAIN UNTIL TANGIBLE RESULTS ARE REALISED BY US. | 1 | ||
RESPODENT DIDNT KNOW MOST THINGS ABOUT FPE BECAUSE SHE HAS NEVER TAKEN HER CHILD TO GOVT SCHOOL | 1 | ||
RESPODENT WAS COOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
RESPODENT WAS DOING HOUSEHOLD WHILE INTERVIEW WAS GOING | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT APPARENTLY NON-COMMITAL ON THIS QUESTIONARE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT CLEARLY RELIEVED TO HEAR INTERVIEW HAS ENDED | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT COOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT COPERATED | 2 | ||
RESPONDENT COPERATED WELL | 2 | ||
RESPONDENT COPERATIVE | 2 | ||
RESPONDENT DON'T KNOW ABOUT TEXT BOOKS IN PRIVATE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT EXHIBITS MIXED SENTIMENTS TOWARDS PUBLIC VC. PRIVATE SYSTEMS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT HAS NO CHILD IN PRIMARY SCHOOL | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT INSISTS THAT SHE DOESN'T KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT PRIVATE SCHOOLS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT IS A REPLACEMENT OF THE PREVIOUS OCUPANT OF THIS HOUSE HOLD | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT IS THE GUARDIAN OF THE STUDENT | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT IS THE STUDENT'S FATHER BUT LIVES IN ANTHER HOUSESHOLD I.E Y042031002 | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT LEFT FOR SOMETIME DURING THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT NOT SURE OF 301 D AND SAY DK AS WELL AS3.2D PART 1 | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT REFUSED TO FILL PGI FOR THE STEP SON | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT SAYS SHE HAS NOT TAKEN HER KIDS TO PUBLIC SCHOOLS SO SHE HAS NO INFORMATION | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT SAYS THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN CALLED FOR PARENTS MEETING | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT TAKES CHARGE WHEN THE MOTHER IN LAW IS NOT AT HOME | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT TOOK TIME IN EXPLAINING HER ANSWERS. | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT UNDERSTOOD ALL QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT VERY COOPERATIVE | 3 | ||
RESPONDENT VERY TALKATIVE AT THIS POINT | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS ATTENTIVE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE | 3 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS NOT ANSWERING QUESTIONS AS REQUIRED. HAD TO PROBE FURTHER. | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS PARENT TO THE CHILD AND LIVED O DIFFERENT HOUSEHOLD | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS POSITIVE TOWARDS INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS SO INQUISITIVE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS VERY CO-OPERATIVE | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS VERY COOPERATIVE | 2 | ||
RESPONDENT WAS VERY POSITIVE TO THE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
RESPONDENT WASHING AS SHE RESPONDS | 1 | ||
RICHARD IS NOT THE HHH OS THIS HH | 1 | ||
SELECTED HOUSE V023075001 SAMPLED V023075003 | 1 | ||
SHE DECLINED TO ANSWER SOME QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
SHE HAS A PROBLEM IN HEARING THIS NEEDS TO BE ABIT LOUD AND REPEAT MANY TIMES. | 1 | ||
SHE IS THE RESPONDENT THAT CAN BE FOUND | 1 | ||
SHE RESPONDED BEST TO HER KNOWLEDGE | 1 | ||
SHE RESPONDED WELL | 1 | ||
SHE RESPONDED WELL, BUT WAS VERY BITTER ON THE ISSUE OF GOVERMENT SCHOOLS,COMPLAINING THEY ARE NOT GIVING ANYTHING GOOD IN EDUCATION. | 1 | ||
SHE TOOK HER CHILDREN TO GOVERNMENT SCHOOL BECAUSE IT WAS CHEAPER AND BECAUSE OF IT QUALITY EDUCATION | 1 | ||
SHE WAS NOT GOOD AT HEARING | 1 | ||
SHIFTED TO V017013002 | 1 | ||
STUDENTS ARE MOVED FROM PRIVATE TO PUBLIC FROM CLASS 7 TO AID IN EXAM REGISTRATION | 1 | ||
STUDENTS DROPPED OUT OF SCHOOL | 1 | ||
SUCCESSFUL | 38 | ||
SUCCESSFUL. | 25 | ||
SUCESSFYLY COMPLETED | 1 | ||
THE CHILD JOINT SCHOOL THIS YEAR | 1 | ||
THE CHILD WAS NOT IN THE SCHOOL FOR THE LAST 2YEARS | 1 | ||
THE FAMILY IS A DIVORCEE | 1 | ||
THE FAMILY OCCUPIESTHE ROOM IE V020132003 AND V020126004 | 1 | ||
THE HH MOVED TO LOCATION V007221004 | 1 | ||
THE HHH DONT HAVE CONCRETE PERCEPTION ON SCHOOLING.THE CHILD DROPPED SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE HHH ISNT ANN AYIMA BUT RICHARD OKTOI | 1 | ||
THE HHH ON THE CHECKLIST IS CHILD TO THE RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
THE HUSBAND PATRICK IS DECEASED THEY RELOCATED FROM ENUMERATION AREA 34 TO EA 35 | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD | 9 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS GOOD ALTHOUGH SEVERALLY INTERUPTED BY THE HHH, CUSTOMERS. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS LIVELY | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS QUITE COOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | 4 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VER INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY ARROGANT | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY GOOD. THE RESPONDENT RESPONDED WELL TO THE QUESTIONS. | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WAS VERY INTERRACTIVE | 1 | ||
THE INTERVIEW WENT ON SMOOTHLY | 1 | ||
THE ISH AND PGI FOR THE CHILDREN (SOFIA, SHERRY, IVET). NEXT DAY BECAUSE THE PARENT DIDN'T HAVE THE SUPPORTING RECORDS BY THEN AND WAS GETTING LATE FOR WORK AS SHE WORKS THE NIGHT SHIFT. | 1 | ||
THE KID IN CLASS ONE IS PROBLEMATIC ACCORDING TO THE MOTHER | 1 | ||
THE MOTHER DROPPED SCHOOL DUE TO PREGNANCY | 1 | ||
THE MOTHER HAS SOME SICKNESS PROBLEM | 1 | ||
THE MOTHER IS SAD SINCE THE SONS HAVE LIMITED CHANCE OF PROCEEDING AFTER | 1 | ||
THE MOTHER IS VERY COPERATIVE | 1 | ||
THE MOTHER WHO WAS THE HHH PASSED AWAY | 1 | ||
THE PARENT DOES NOT RECGNISE THE FREE PRIMARY EDUCATION | 1 | ||
THE PARENT DOES NOT RECOPGNISE THE FREE PRIMARY EDUCATIONN | 1 | ||
THE PARENT FEELS THAT GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS ARE GOOD BUT IT IS SO HARD FOR HIM TO GET HIS CHILDREN IN GOVERNMENT SCHOOLS. | 1 | ||
THE PARENT HAS STUDENTS IN BOTH PUBLIC & PRIVATE | 1 | ||
THE PARENT IN DIFF. HOUSEHOLD | 1 | ||
THE PARENT INSIST THAT THE GOVERNEMNT SCHOOL ARE GOOD AND CHEAP BUT VERY FEW IN THE AREA. | 1 | ||
THE PARENT INSISTS THAT SHE HAS NO PERCEPTION OF PUBLIC SCHOOLS BECAUSE HER KIDS ARE IN PRIVATE SCHOOLS AND THE ONLY ONE IN PUBLIC SCHOOL HAS JUST JOINED IT AND DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT IT | 1 | ||
THE PARENT MAINTAINS NO FREE EDUCATION | 1 | ||
THE PARENT SUPPORTS PUBLIC SCHOOLS MORE | 1 | ||
THE PARENTINSISTS THAT SHE TAKES HER KID TO A PUBLIC SCHOOL AND DOES NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT THEM.SHE INSISTS THAT SHE HAS NO PERCEPTION ON PUBLIC SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE PARENTS LIVE IN DIFFERENT HOUSEHOLD | 1 | ||
THE PARET HAS ALOT OF MISGIVINGS ABOUT TEACHERS IN PUBLIC SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE PUPILS USUALLY REACH CLASS EIGHT FOR THEIR STUDIES | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS COPERATIVE AND ALERT | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT AND HIS WIFE ONLY GO TO SCHOOL AT THE END OF EACH TERM TO COLLECT REPORT BOOKS | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT COMPLAINED OF THE NUMERIOUS QUESTIONS ASKED | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT DID NOT KNOW SOME ANSWERS SHE SAID THEQUESTIONS WERE DIFFICULT BECAUSE SHE HAD NOT BEEN KEEN TO NOTICE THE DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SCHOOL | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT IS GUARDIAN TO THE STUDENT AND CHILD TO HHH. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT OPINED HIS VIEWS AMICABLY | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT RESPONDED WELL | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SAYS THAT HE DOES NOT KNOW ABOUT THE AMOUNT OF TEXT BOOKS | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SEEMS TO BE AGAINST PRIVATE EDUCATION | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT STRESSED ON THE DISADVANTAGES OF FPES | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT SUPPORTS THE FPE | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT TRIED TO EXPLAIN HER OPINION THAT IS FOR PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EDUCATION | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY PARTICIPATORY | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS A DRUG ADICT AND WAS TAKING MIRAA AND SMOKING THROUGHT THE INTERVIEW. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS CO-OPERATIVE | 8 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS CO-OPERATIVE. | 4 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS COOPERATIVE | 5 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS FRIENDLY AND ALL ABLE. THE INTERVIEW WAS SUCCESSFUL | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS IN HURRY AND NOT CONCETRATING | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS NOT COMPREHENDING THE QUESTIONS WELL | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS RELUCTANT TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS. | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS STILL BUSY WITH HER WORK | 1 | ||
THE RESPONDENT WAS VERY UNCOOPERATIVE IN RESPONDING TO MOST QUESTIONS. | 1 | ||
THE SPOUSE TO HHH RESPONDED WELL | 1 | ||
THE STUDENTS IN SECONDARY SCHOOL SOMETIMES DECIDE HIMSELF | 1 | ||
THESE ARE IN MIGRANTS IDS STILL NOT IN THE SYSTEM | 1 | ||
THESE INDIVIDUALS ARE TAKEN CARE OF ,BY THEIR GRANDMOTHER. | 1 | ||
THIS HH IS IMMIGRANT THE SAMPLED HH MOVED TO KAYOLE | 1 | ||
THIS HOUSEHOLD IS A REPLACE FOR THE SAMPLED HOUSEHOLD AT LOCATION V012099005 THAT EXITED | 1 | ||
THIS IS A SINGLE MOTHER | 1 | ||
THIS IS AREPLACE OF LOCATION ID V038064004 WHICH EXITED | 1 | ||
THIS LOCATION REPLACED V013364001 | 1 | ||
THIS LOCATION V038017002 IS A REPLACE FOR LOCATION V038017003 WHICH EXITED | 1 | ||
TOOK LONG TO ANSWER THE QUESTIONS | 1 | ||
UNCOOPERATIVE | 1 | ||
V017100002 SHIFTED SO REPLACED BY V017100006 | 1 | ||
V023070003 SHIFTED TO V023070001 | 1 | ||
VERY COOPERATIVE | 12 | ||
VERY COOPERATIVE INTERVIEW | 1 | ||
VERY COOPERATIVE RESPONDENT | 2 | ||
VERY GOOD | 12 | ||
VERY INTERESTING | 1 | ||
VERY NICE BUT HIS RESPONSES WERE NOT CONSISITENT | 1 | ||
VERY SUCCESSFUL | 3 | ||
VERY WELL | 1 | ||
WA OKAY | 1 | ||
WAS A LEARNING EXPERIENCE. IT IS GOOD TO SIMPLIFY THE LANGUAGE FOR THE RESPONDENT TO UNDERSTAND 3.1 | 1 | ||
WAS FINE | 12 | ||
WAS FIVE | 1 | ||
WAS GOOD | 2 | ||
WAS GREAT | 1 | ||
WAS NOT SURE ABOUT SOME INFORMATION ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS. | 1 | ||
WAS OKAY | 7 | ||
WAS SUCCESSFUL | 4 | ||
WAS SUCCESSFUL. RESPONDENT COPERATED | 1 | ||
WAS VERY GOOD | 2 | ||
WAS VERY INTERACTIVE | 1 | ||
WEL DONE | 1 | ||
WELL CONDUCTED | 1 | ||
WELL DONE | 4 | ||
WELL DONE. THE RESPONDENT WAS HONEST. | 1 | ||
WELL DONE.THE RESPONDENT ANSWERED WELL. | 1 | ||
WELL DONE.THE RESPONDENT IS NOT FOR FREE PRIMARY EDUCATION. | 1 | ||
WELL RESPONDED | 3 | ||
WELL RESPONDENT | 1 | ||
WENT ON WELL | 1 | ||
WENT WELL | 1 | ||
WONDERFUL | 1 |