| Value |
Category |
| 11/02/2014 |
|
| age |
|
| baby away |
|
| baby does not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| baby does notmeet inclusion criteria |
|
| baby doesnot meet criteria |
|
| baby doesnot meet inclusion criteria |
|
| baby not in sample list |
|
| baby not sampled |
|
| baby stopped diarrhoearing |
|
| baby upcountry |
|
| baby upcoutry |
|
| baby's stool taken during pilot |
|
| child a neither |
|
| child away |
|
| child did not give out the sample |
|
| child does not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| child had already turned into a neither when the faecal pot was drpped at the household |
|
| child had diarrohea for seven days |
|
| child had diarrohea in the last two weeks so its neither a case nor a control. |
|
| child had dirrhoea for more than two weeks |
|
| child had taken amoxylin and is therefore not a case or control |
|
| child is a neither |
|
| child is in upcountry |
|
| child not sampled |
|
| child not yet sampled. |
|
| child took antibiotics |
|
| child turned into a neither when the faecal pot was being taken there |
|
| child under medication |
|
| child up-country |
|
| child upcountry |
|
| child was given antibiotics |
|
| child was neiher case nor control she had taken antibiotics |
|
| child was neither a case nor a control |
|
| child was neither a case nor a control. |
|
| child was neither case nor control |
|
| child was neither case nor control she had taken antibiotics |
|
| child was okey |
|
| child's diarrhoea stopped and could nt produce stool within the required time for a case |
|
| chld up-country |
|
| collected in survey 7 |
|
| collected in survey 8 as control |
|
| control and interview conducted on a friday |
|
| control stool collected last interview |
|
| diarrhoea stopped shortly after the faecal pot was left |
|
| diarrohea had stopped the next day. |
|
| did not eet inclusion criteria |
|
| did not get it in therequired no. of days |
|
| did not meet criteria for control sample |
|
| did not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| did not meet inlusion criteria |
|
| did not meet the inclusion criteria |
|
| did not pass stool in the required time |
|
| didnt meet the criteria for the study. |
|
| doea not meet inclusion criterea |
|
| doeas not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| does not meet criteria |
|
| does not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| does meet incclusion critera |
|
| does meet inclusion criteria |
|
| does not inclusion criteria |
|
| does not meet age and sex |
|
| does not meet criteria |
|
| does not meet criteria for the study |
|
| does not meet icnclusion criteria |
|
| does not meet inclusio criteria |
|
| does not meet inclusion |
|
| does not meet inclusion crieria |
|
| does not meet inclusion criterea |
|
| does not meet inclusion criteri |
|
| does not meet inclusion criteria |
|
| does not meet inclusion criteria. |
|
| does not meet inclusoin criteria |
|
| does not meet inlusion criteria |
|
| does not meet the criteria |
|
| does not meet the criteria for the study |
|
| does not meet the criteria for the study. |
|
| does not meet the inclusion criteria |
|
| does not meet the study criteria |
|
| does not meetinclusion criteria |
|
| does notmeet inclusion criteria |
|
| doesnt meet criteria |
|
| doteries not meet the criteria |
|
| expired |
|
| had been collected as a control in the last update |
|
| had been collected last update as a case |
|
| had diarrhoea in a period of less than two weeks |
|
| had diarrhoea only once in a span of 24 hours |
|
| had diarrohea less than two weeks ago |
|
| had dirrhoea only once in a period of 24 hrs |
|
| had taken antibiotic |
|
| he was neither case nor control |
|
| interview conducted on a friday,child case but already under antibiotics |
|
| interview okay. |
|
| it is a neither |
|
| it was a neither |
|
| it was collected as a case in the last update |
|
| it was ok |
|
| its only six days since diarrhoea stopped |
|
| mother did not get time to collect the stool |
|
| mother did not have time to collect |
|
| mother not available |
|
| mother not cooperative |
|
| mother not easily found at home |
|
| mother refused to give the sample |
|
| mother refused to have the stool collecte though child was sampled |
|
| mother reluctant |
|
| mother travelled a day after the interview was conducted |
|
| mother unavailable |
|
| mother was not at home |
|
| mother was not cooperative and claimed to be busy. |
|
| mother was reluctant |
|
| mum did not give out the sample |
|
| n/a |
|
| n0t sampled |
|
| na |
|
| neither |
|
| neither case nor cntrol |
|
| neither case nor control |
|
| neither case nor control child had diarriahoea for two weeks and stopped two days ago |
|
| neither case nor controll |
|
| neither case norcontrol |
|
| neither case or control |
|
| neither child took antibiotics |
|
| neither control or case |
|
| neither/case nor control |
|
| no sampled |
|
| no stool sample |
|
| no stool available |
|
| no stool sample for over a week |
|
| noot sampled |
|
| not sampled |
|
| not sampled. |
|
| not case nor control |
|
| not case not control |
|
| not case or control |
|
| not completed |
|
| not in sample list |
|
| not in sampled list |
|
| not instructed to by the team leader |
|
| not instructed to by the tl |
|
| not presampled |
|
| not qualified for inlusion criteria |
|
| not s ampled |
|
| not samled |
|
| not samlped |
|
| not samoled |
|
| not samped |
|
| not samped for collection |
|
| not sample |
|
| not sample for collection |
|
| not sampled |
|
| not sampled for for collection |
|
| not sampled for bcollection |
|
| not sampled for cllection |
|
| not sampled for collection |
|
| not sampled for collection. |
|
| not sampled forcollection |
|
| not sampled. |
|
| not sampled.. |
|
| not sampledd |
|
| not sapled |
|
| not selected |
|
| notsampled |
|
| npt sampled |
|
| nt sampled |
|
| only six days passed since diarrhoea stopped |
|
| period between the the current episope and the previous episode was less thean 14 days |
|
| refused to give stool sample |
|
| respondent said that it is a taboo to take away the stool of someone |
|
| respondent said we ask too many question |
|
| sample disqualified after prolonged revisits without success. |
|
| she was neither case nor control |
|
| the child was neither case nor control |
|
| the child had diarrhoea for one week |
|
| the child had diarroea for two weeks |
|
| the child had taken antibiotic |
|
| the child was neither |
|
| the child was neither case nor control |
|
| the child was neither case nor control she had diarroea for four days |
|
| the diarroea had stopped |
|
| the mother was not cooperative |
|
| the previous interview the child was case so the sample could not be collected for the second time |
|
| there was no stool for over a week |
|
| time for case expired. |
|
| turned to a case at collection time |
|
| unavailability of mother to deliver the stool |
|
| was |
|
| was not sampled |
|
| was a control |
|
| was a neither |
|
| was a neither has taken antibiotic. |
|
| was a neother |
|
| was case in last update |
|
| was collected in the previous update as a case |
|
| was collectedas case in last update |
|
| was just a neither |
|
| was not s ampled |
|
| was not samled |
|
| was not samlped |
|
| was not sampled |
|
| was not sampled for collection |
|
| was sampled but had already became a neither when the pot was being dropped |
|
| was sampled but mother travelled to upcountry two days after the interview was conducted |
|
Warning: these figures indicate the number of cases found in the data file. They cannot be interpreted as summary statistics of the population of interest.
